Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor vs ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor
The Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor wins for gaming, boasting a staggering 165Hz refresh rate compared to the ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor's 75Hz. This means smoother gameplay, especially in fast-paced titles where every millisecond counts. However, the ASUS ProArt excels in color accuracy with a WQHD resolution of 2560 x 1440, giving you sharper images and richer detail for photo editing and design work. In real-world use, this higher resolution translates to a noticeably clearer picture, making it ideal for creative professionals in 2026. Key specs: Display: 23.8" vs 27" and Refresh: 165 Hz vs 75 Hz.
Why compare these? The Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor (budget-friendly) and ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor (entry-level) represent different approaches to monitors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Acer Nitro | ASUS ProArt |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | ✓4.6★ (4,309 reviews) | 4.4★ (3,104 reviews) |
| Top Strength | IPS panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use | Factory calibrated and Calman Verified for excellent color accuracy (Delta E < 2) out of the box |
| Main Drawback | Stand lacks height, swivel, and pivot adjustments (Tilt only) | Lacks USB-C connectivity for single-cable laptop docking (found on the pricier 'CV' model) |
| Market Position | Budget | ✓Entry |
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor
27" Viewable (27" Class)
2560 x 1440 (WQHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor vs ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor
ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor
| Criterion | Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor | ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(4,309)Amazon | ★4.4(3,104)Amazon |
Screen Size | 23.8" Viewable (24" Class) | 27" Viewable (27" Class) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 2560 x 1440 (WQHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | IPS (In-Plane Switching) | IPS (In-Plane Switching) |
Refresh Rate | 144 Hz (Native) / 165 Hz (Overclock) | 75 Hz |
Response Time | 2 ms (GtG) / 0.5 ms (Min) | 5 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 250 nits (cd/m²) | 350 nits (Typical) |
Contrast | 1,000:1 (Static) / 100,000,000:1 (Dynamic) | 1,000:1 (Typical) |
Color Gamut | 99% sRGB | 100% sRGB / 100% Rec. 709 |
Color Depth | 16.7M (6-bit + FRC) | 16.7M (8-bit) |
HDR | HDR10 (Software support) | No (Not supported) |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync Premium | Adaptive-Sync (48Hz - 75Hz range) |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | Flat |
Speakers | 2x 2 W (Stereo) | 2x 2 W (Stereo) |
Ports | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x 3.5mm Audio Out | 1x Mini DisplayPort 1.2; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x Dual-Link DVI-D; 4x USB 3.0 Downstream; 1x USB-B Upstream; 1x 3.5mm Audio In; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 20°) | Height (150mm), Swivel (-90° to 90°), Pivot (90°), Tilt (-5° to 35°) |
Power Consumption | 20 W (Typical) / 0.5 W (Standby) | 18.6 W (Typical) / 0.5 W (Standby) |
Weight With Stand | 4,930 g (10.87 lbs) | 7,720 g (17.02 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
144 Hz (Native) / 165 Hz (Overclock)
2 ms (GtG) / 0.5 ms (Min)
Pros
- IPS panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use
- 165Hz overclockable refresh rate provides smooth motion for competitive gaming
Cons
- Stand lacks height, swivel, and pivot adjustments (Tilt only)
- Peak brightness (250 nits) is standard and may struggle in bright rooms
ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor
27" Viewable (27" Class)
2560 x 1440 (WQHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
75 Hz
5 ms (GtG)
Pros
- Factory calibrated and Calman Verified for excellent color accuracy (Delta E < 2) out of the box
- Rare inclusion of legacy ports (Mini DisplayPort and DVI-D) maximizes compatibility with older workstations
Cons
- Lacks USB-C connectivity for single-cable laptop docking (found on the pricier 'CV' model)
- No HDR support
Which one is better?
The Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 165Hz refresh rate crushes the ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor's 75Hz. That said, grab the ASUS if you prioritize display quality for creative work, as its WQHD resolution offers a significant upgrade over FHD.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor if: you play competitive games, want a budget-friendly option with a high refresh rate, or need a monitor that fits in tight spaces. (23.8" display, 165 Hz refresh)
Choose the ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor if: you do a lot of photo editing, need accurate colors out of the box, or prefer a larger screen for multitasking. (27" display, 75 Hz refresh)
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.4★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose Acer Nitro
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose ASUS ProArt
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose Acer Nitro
IPS panel ensures Priority
IPS panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use
→ Choose Acer Nitro
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Bottom line: The Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor edges ahead with a 4.6★ rating compared to 4.4★. However, ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor remains a strong contender if its strengths align better with your needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor or ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor?
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize ips panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use. ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor wins if you value factory calibrated and calman verified for excellent color accuracy (delta e < 2) out of the box. Both are rated highly (4.6★ vs 4.4★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor and ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor?
Key differences: Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor offers ips panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use, while ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor stands out with factory calibrated and calman verified for excellent color accuracy (delta e < 2) out of the box. Consider that Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor stand lacks height, swivel, and pivot adjustments (tilt only). Meanwhile, ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor lacks usb-c connectivity for single-cable laptop docking (found on the pricier 'cv' model). Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.