Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor vs ASUS ZenScreen MB16ACE 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor
The Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor crushes the ASUS ZenScreen MB16ACE 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor when it comes to refresh rate: 165Hz vs 60Hz. This means smoother gameplay and better responsiveness, perfect for gamers or anyone who values fluid motion in their visuals. In real-world use, the larger 23.8" display of the Acer Nitro provides a more immersive experience, especially for multitasking or gaming. While the ASUS ZenScreen is ultra-portable at just 1.57 lbs, its lower refresh rate and smaller size might not satisfy users looking for more robust performance and screen real estate. Key specs: Display: 23.8" vs 15.6" and Refresh: 165 Hz vs 60 Hz.
Why compare these? The Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor (budget-friendly) and ASUS ZenScreen MB16ACE 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor (entry-level) represent different approaches to monitors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Acer Nitro | ASUS ZenScreen |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | ✓4.6★ (4,309 reviews) | 4.3★ (2,451 reviews) |
| Top Strength | IPS panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use | Hybrid Signal Solution allows connection to both USB-C and USB-A (via driver) devices |
| Main Drawback | Stand lacks height, swivel, and pivot adjustments (Tilt only) | Low peak brightness (220 nits typical) makes it difficult to use in bright environments |
| Market Position | Budget | ✓Entry |
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
ASUS ZenScreen MB16ACE 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor
15.6" (39.6 cm)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor vs ASUS ZenScreen MB16ACE 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor
ASUS ZenScreen MB16ACE 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor
| Criterion | Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor | ASUS ZenScreen MB16ACE 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(4,309)Amazon | ★4.3(2,451)Amazon |
Screen Size | 23.8" Viewable (24" Class) | 15.6" (39.6 cm) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | IPS (In-Plane Switching) | IPS |
Refresh Rate | 144 Hz (Native) / 165 Hz (Overclock) | 60 Hz |
Response Time | 2 ms (GtG) / 0.5 ms (Min) | 5 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 250 nits (cd/m²) | 220 cd/m² (Typical); 250 cd/m² (Peak) |
Contrast | 1,000:1 (Static) / 100,000,000:1 (Dynamic) | 800:1 (Static) |
Color Gamut | 99% sRGB | 45% NTSC (approx. 62-70% sRGB) |
Color Depth | 16.7M (6-bit + FRC) | 6-bit (262K colors) |
HDR | HDR10 (Software support) | No (Not supported) |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync Premium | No (Not supported) |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | No (Flat panel) |
Speakers | 2x 2 W (Stereo) | No |
Ports | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x 3.5mm Audio Out | 1x USB-C (Hybrid Signal Solution: Supports DP Alt Mode & USB 3.0 via driver) |
USB C | No | Yes (1x USB-C for Video + Power) |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | No (Not supported) |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 20°) | Smart Case (Tilt); Auto-rotation (Portrait/Landscape via software); Pen hole prop |
Power Consumption | 20 W (Typical) / 0.5 W (Standby) | 8 W (Typical); 0 W (Hard Switch Off) |
Weight With Stand | 4,930 g (10.87 lbs) | 710 g (1.57 lbs) [Monitor only]; Case adds approx. 400g |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
144 Hz (Native) / 165 Hz (Overclock)
2 ms (GtG) / 0.5 ms (Min)
Pros
- IPS panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use
- 165Hz overclockable refresh rate provides smooth motion for competitive gaming
Cons
- Stand lacks height, swivel, and pivot adjustments (Tilt only)
- Peak brightness (250 nits) is standard and may struggle in bright rooms
ASUS ZenScreen MB16ACE 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor
15.6" (39.6 cm)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS
60 Hz
5 ms (GtG)
Pros
- Hybrid Signal Solution allows connection to both USB-C and USB-A (via driver) devices
- Ultra-lightweight (1.57 lbs) and slim (8mm) design fits easily in laptop bags
Cons
- Low peak brightness (220 nits typical) makes it difficult to use in bright environments
- 6-bit color depth (262K colors) results in inferior color accuracy and gradients
Which one is better?
The Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 165Hz refresh rate crushes the ASUS ZenScreen's 60Hz. That said, grab the ASUS ZenScreen if you need something ultra-light and portable - it's lighter.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor if: you game frequently and need a smooth 165Hz refresh rate, you want a larger 23.8" screen for multitasking, or you value wide viewing angles with its IPS panel.
Choose the ASUS ZenScreen MB16ACE 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor if: you prioritize portability at just 1.57 lbs, you need a secondary monitor for on-the-go productivity, or you want to connect easily via USB-C or USB-A.
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.3★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose Acer Nitro
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 4,309 reviews vs 2,451
→ Choose Acer Nitro
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose ASUS ZenScreen
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose Acer Nitro
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Bottom line: The Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor edges ahead with a 4.6★ rating compared to 4.3★. However, ASUS ZenScreen MB16ACE 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor remains a strong contender if its strengths align better with your needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor or ASUS ZenScreen MB16ACE 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor?
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize ips panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use. ASUS ZenScreen MB16ACE 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor wins if you value hybrid signal solution allows connection to both usb-c and usb-a (via driver) devices. Both are rated highly (4.6★ vs 4.3★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor and ASUS ZenScreen MB16ACE 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor?
Key differences: Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor offers ips panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use, while ASUS ZenScreen MB16ACE 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor stands out with hybrid signal solution allows connection to both usb-c and usb-a (via driver) devices. Consider that Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor stand lacks height, swivel, and pivot adjustments (tilt only). Meanwhile, ASUS ZenScreen MB16ACE 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor low peak brightness (220 nits typical) makes it difficult to use in bright environments. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.