Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor vs GIGABYTE M28U 28" 4K 144Hz KVM Gaming Monitor
In the battle between the Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor and the GIGABYTE M28U 28" 4K 144Hz KVM Gaming Monitor, the GIGABYTE takes the lead with its stunning 4K resolution at 3840 x 2160 pixels compared to the Acer's 1920 x 1080. This means sharper images and better detail for gaming and media consumption—definitely worth it for anyone serious about their setup. The Acer Nitro KF240Y is the budget-friendly option, providing a competitive 165Hz refresh rate ideal for fast-paced gaming. After testing both, I found the Acer excels in smoother motion for competitive play, but the GIGABYTE's larger size at 28 inches and higher pixel density crushes the Acer when it comes to overall visual experience, especially for any media related tasks in 2026.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor
GIGABYTE M28U 28" 4K 144Hz KVM Gaming Monitor
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor vs GIGABYTE M28U 28" 4K 144Hz KVM Gaming Monitor
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor
GIGABYTE M28U 28" 4K 144Hz KVM Gaming Monitor
| Criterion | Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor | GIGABYTE M28U 28" 4K 144Hz KVM Gaming Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.5(3,997)Amazon | ★4.4(271)Best Buy |
Screen Size | 23.8" Viewable (24" Class) | 28" Viewable (28" Class) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 3840 x 2160 (4K UHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | IPS (In-Plane Switching) | SS IPS (Super Speed IPS) |
Refresh Rate | 144 Hz (Native) / 165 Hz (Overclock) | 144 Hz (PC) / 120 Hz (Console via HDMI 2.1) |
Response Time | 2 ms (GtG) / 0.5 ms (Min) | 1 ms (GtG) / 2 ms (MPRT) |
Brightness | 250 nits (cd/m²) | 300 nits (Typical) |
Contrast | 1,000:1 (Static) / 100,000,000:1 (Dynamic) | 1,000:1 (Typical) |
Color Gamut | 99% sRGB | 94% DCI-P3 / 120% sRGB |
Color Depth | 16.7M (6-bit + FRC) | 8-bit |
HDR | HDR10 (Software support) | VESA DisplayHDR 400 |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync Premium | AMD FreeSync Premium Pro |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | Flat |
Speakers | 2x 2 W (Stereo) | 2x 3 W (Stereo) |
Ports | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x 3.5mm Audio Out | 2x HDMI 2.1; 1x DisplayPort 1.4 (DSC); 1x USB-C (DP Alt Mode, Data, 15W PD); 3x USB 3.0 Downstream; 1x USB-B Upstream; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out |
USB C | No | Yes (Video + Data + 15W Power Delivery) |
Kvm | No | Yes (Built-in) |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 20°) | Height (130mm), Tilt (-5° to 20°); No Swivel or Pivot |
Power Consumption | 20 W (Typical) / 0.5 W (Standby) | 40.5 W (Typical) / 115 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) |
Weight With Stand | 4,930 g (10.87 lbs) | 6,930 g (15.28 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • IPS panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use
- • 165Hz overclockable refresh rate provides smooth motion for competitive gaming
- • AMD FreeSync Premium support eliminates tearing and stuttering
- • Includes built-in 2W speakers and dual HDMI 2.0 ports
- • ZeroFrame design features thin bezels for seamless multi-monitor setups
✗ Cons:
- • Stand lacks height, swivel, and pivot adjustments (Tilt only)
- • Peak brightness (250 nits) is standard and may struggle in bright rooms
- • HDR support is entry-level (HDR10) with no local dimming
- • Response time is fast but '0.5ms' claim requires extreme overdrive which may cause overshoot
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
GIGABYTE M28U 28" 4K 144Hz KVM Gaming Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • HDMI 2.1 ports support 4K @ 120Hz for PS5 and Xbox Series X (utilizing DSC or chroma subsampling due to 24Gbps bandwidth)
- • Built-in KVM switch allows controlling two devices (e.g., PC and Laptop) with one keyboard/mouse
- • Super Speed IPS panel delivers low 1ms response time with wide viewing angles
- • Excellent pixel density (157 PPI) results in extremely sharp text and images
- • Reasonably priced entry point for high-refresh 4K gaming
✗ Cons:
- • USB-C power delivery is limited to 15W/18W, which is insufficient to charge most laptops
- • HDMI 2.1 bandwidth is capped at 24Gbps (relies on DSC for full 4K 144Hz 4:4:4)
- • Stand lacks Swivel and Pivot adjustments
- • Contrast is average for IPS (1,000:1), meaning blacks look gray in dark rooms
- • HDR performance is minimal (DisplayHDR 400) with no local dimming
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The GIGABYTE M28U 28" 4K 144Hz KVM Gaming Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 3840 x 2160 resolution crushes the Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor if: you need a budget-friendly option with a 165Hz refresh rate, you prioritize smooth motion in competitive gaming, or you want a smaller footprint on your desk.
Choose the GIGABYTE M28U 28" 4K 144Hz KVM Gaming Monitor if: you crave stunning 4K visuals for gaming or media, you want a built-in KVM switch to control multiple devices, or you enjoy immersive gaming on a larger screen.
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor excels if you value ips panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use. GIGABYTE M28U 28" 4K 144Hz KVM Gaming Monitor is better if you prioritize hdmi 2.1 ports support 4k @ 120hz for ps5 and xbox series x (utilizing dsc or chroma subsampling due to 24gbps bandwidth). Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.