Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor vs LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor
The LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor is the better buy for most people - its blistering 240Hz refresh rate crushes the Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor's 165Hz. The numbers reveal a massive difference in motion clarity, especially for competitive gaming, where every millisecond matters. In real-world use, the UltraGear’s 0.03ms response time is a game-changer, delivering smooth visuals that make fast-paced action feel seamless. On the flip side, if you're looking to save money, the Acer Nitro offers solid performance with its 165Hz refresh rate and excellent IPS panel, making it a worthy budget choice for casual use in 2026.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor

LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor vs LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor

Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor

LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor
| Criterion | Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor | LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.5(3,997)Amazon | ★4.5(849)Best Buy |
Screen Size | 23.8" Viewable (24" Class) | 26.5" Viewable (27" Class) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 2560 x 1440 (QHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | IPS (In-Plane Switching) | WOLED (White OLED) |
Refresh Rate | 144 Hz (Native) / 165 Hz (Overclock) | 240 Hz |
Response Time | 2 ms (GtG) / 0.5 ms (Min) | 0.03 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 250 nits (cd/m²) | 200 nits (SDR Typical) / 1,000 nits (HDR Peak at 3% APL) |
Contrast | 1,000:1 (Static) / 100,000,000:1 (Dynamic) | 1,500,000:1 (Typ.) |
Color Gamut | 99% sRGB | 98.5% DCI-P3 (CIE1976) |
Color Depth | 16.7M (6-bit + FRC) | 1.07 Billion (10-bit) |
HDR | HDR10 (Software support) | HDR10 |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync Premium | NVIDIA G-SYNC Compatible / AMD FreeSync Premium |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | Flat |
Speakers | 2x 2 W (Stereo) | No (None) |
Ports | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x 3.5mm Audio Out | 2x HDMI 2.1; 1x DisplayPort 1.4 (DSC); 1x USB 3.0 Upstream; 2x USB 3.0 Downstream; 1x 4-Pole Headphone Out (DTS Headphone:X); 1x Optical Audio Out (SPDIF) |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 20°) | Height (110mm), Swivel (-10° to 10°), Tilt (-5° to 15°), Pivot (90°) |
Power Consumption | 20 W (Typical) / 0.5 W (Standby) | 36.7 W (Typical) / 94 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Sleep) |
Weight With Stand | 4,930 g (10.87 lbs) | 7,350 g (16.2 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • IPS panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use
- • 165Hz overclockable refresh rate provides smooth motion for competitive gaming
- • AMD FreeSync Premium support eliminates tearing and stuttering
- • Includes built-in 2W speakers and dual HDMI 2.0 ports
- • ZeroFrame design features thin bezels for seamless multi-monitor setups
✗ Cons:
- • Stand lacks height, swivel, and pivot adjustments (Tilt only)
- • Peak brightness (250 nits) is standard and may struggle in bright rooms
- • HDR support is entry-level (HDR10) with no local dimming
- • Response time is fast but '0.5ms' claim requires extreme overdrive which may cause overshoot
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • WOLED panel delivers perfect black levels and infinite contrast with no blooming
- • 240Hz refresh rate combined with 0.03ms response provides motion clarity matching 360Hz LCDs
- • Includes a physical remote control for easy OSD access (rare for monitors)
- • Matte anti-glare coating reduces reflections in lit rooms (unlike glossy QD-OLEDs)
- • Supports 4K @ 120Hz downscaling via HDMI 2.1 for PS5/Xbox Series X
✗ Cons:
- • SDR brightness is aggressive capped (~200 nits), looking dim in bright rooms
- • Matte coating can introduce a slight 'grain' or fuzziness to white backgrounds
- • RWBG subpixel layout causes text fringing (text looks less sharp than on LCDs)
- • Aggressive ABL (Auto Brightness Limiter) dims the screen when large white windows are open
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 240Hz refresh rate crushes the Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor’s 165Hz.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor if: you want to save money, need consistent colors for mixed use, or prefer a smaller size. (23.8" display, 165 Hz refresh)
Choose the LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor if: you crave top-notch gaming performance, enjoy stunning visuals with deep blacks, or play fast-paced games often. (26.5" display, 240 Hz refresh)
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
Acer Nitro KF240Y bmiipx 23.8" FHD Monitor excels if you value ips panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles ideal for mixed use. LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor is better if you prioritize woled panel delivers perfect black levels and infinite contrast with no blooming. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
