Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor vs ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor
If you're deciding between the Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor and the ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor, the Acer takes the lead. Its 75Hz refresh rate makes gaming smoother compared to the ARZOPA's 60Hz, which is a big deal if you're into fast-paced action. In real-world use, the Acer's larger 21.5" display offers a more immersive experience, while the ARZOPA is ultra-light at just 1.6 lbs, perfect for travel. So, if you're looking for a budget monitor that excels in performance and size, the Acer is worth considering, especially in 2026 when space and performance matter more than ever.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor
ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor vs ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor
Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor
ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor
| Criterion | Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor | ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(43,282)Amazon | ★4.4(14,391)Amazon |
Screen Size | 21.5" Viewable | 15.6" (39.6 cm) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | IPS (In-Plane Switching) | IPS |
Refresh Rate | 75 Hz (via HDMI) / 60 Hz (via VGA) | 60 Hz |
Response Time | 4 ms (GtG) | N/A (Not specified) |
Brightness | 250 nits (cd/m²) | 300 cd/m² (Typical) |
Contrast | 1,000:1 (Static) / 100,000,000:1 (Dynamic) | 1,200:1 (Static) |
Color Gamut | 72% NTSC (Approx. 99% sRGB) | 45% NTSC (approx. 65% sRGB) |
Color Depth | 16.7M (6-bit + FRC) | 6-bit (262K colors) |
HDR | No (Not supported) | HDR10 (Signal support only) |
Adaptive Sync | AMD Radeon FreeSync (48-75Hz range via HDMI) | No (Not supported) |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | No (Flat panel) |
Speakers | No (None) | Yes (2x 1W) |
Ports | 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x VGA | 1x Mini HDMI; 2x USB-C (Full Function: DP Alt Mode + Power Delivery); 1x 3.5mm Audio Out |
USB C | No | Yes (2x USB-C with Pass-Through Charging support) |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | No (Not VESA compatible) | No (Not supported) |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 15°) | Built-in adjustable kickstand (0° to 90° tilt) |
Power Consumption | 24 W (Typical) / 0.45 W (Standby) | 8 W (Max); Requires 5V/2.4A source |
Weight With Stand | 2,480 g (5.47 lbs) | 725 g (1.6 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • Ultra-thin 'Zero Frame' design looks modern and saves desk space
- • IPS panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles (178°)
- • 75Hz refresh rate with FreeSync provides smoother gaming than standard 60Hz panels
- • Excellent value for a secondary display or compact primary monitor
- • Lightweight (under 5.5 lbs) makes it easy to move or reposition
✗ Cons:
- • Lacks VESA mount compatibility (cannot be mounted on arms or walls)
- • No built-in audio or headphone jack
- • Stand is basic with no height, swivel, or pivot adjustments
- • Limited connectivity (only 1x HDMI and 1x VGA; no DisplayPort)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • Ultra-lightweight design (1.6 lbs) makes it ideal for travel
- • Plug-and-play single cable connection via USB-C for compatible laptops
- • Includes necessary cables (USB-C to USB-C, Mini HDMI to HDMI, USB-A to USB-C)
- • Built-in kickstand offers decent stability without needing a separate cover
- • Pass-through charging allows you to power the monitor and charge a connected device simultaneously
✗ Cons:
- • Limited color gamut (45% NTSC) makes colors look washed out; not suitable for photo editing
- • No VESA mounting holes limits installation options
- • Brightness (300 nits) is sufficient for indoors but struggles in direct sunlight
- • Lacks a built-in battery; must draw power from the connected device or wall adapter
- • 6-bit color depth can result in visible color banding in gradients
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 75Hz refresh rate crushes the ARZOPA's 60Hz. That said, grab the ARZOPA A1 if you need a lightweight portable option for travel - it's lighter.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor if: you want a larger display for gaming, need smoother visuals with a 75Hz refresh rate, or prefer vibrant colors with a 72% NTSC color gamut.
Choose the ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor if: you need a lightweight travel monitor at just 1.6 lbs, want easy plug-and-play with USB-C connectivity, or need a built-in kickstand for on-the-go productivity.
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor excels if you value ultra-thin 'zero frame' design looks modern and saves desk space. ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor is better if you prioritize ultra-lightweight design (1.6 lbs) makes it ideal for travel. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.