Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor vs LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
When comparing the Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor to the LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor, the clear distinction lies in their display capabilities: 1920 x 1080 vs 3440 x 1440. The LG's ultrawide resolution offers a staggering 33% more screen space, perfect for multitasking or immersive gaming experiences. In real-world use, the Acer SB220Q bi shines as a budget option for casual tasks with its ultra-thin design and vibrant colors. However, the LG monitor's 160Hz refresh rate and HDR10 support make it a powerhouse for gaming enthusiasts, providing smoother visuals and deeper contrasts that elevate your entire viewing experience. Key specs: Display: 21.5" vs 34" and Refresh: 75 Hz vs 160 Hz.
Why compare these? The Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor (budget-friendly) and LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor (mid-range) represent different approaches to monitors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Acer SB220Q | LG 34WP60C-B |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.6★ (42,572 reviews) | 4.6★ (1,104 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Ultra-thin 'Zero Frame' design looks modern and saves desk space | Expansive 21:9 WQHD resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9 |
| Main Drawback | Lacks VESA mount compatibility (cannot be mounted on arms or walls) | Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments |
| Market Position | Budget | ✓Mid-range |

Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor
21.5" Viewable
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)

LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
34" Viewable (34" Class)
3440 x 1440 (WQHD)
21:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor vs LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor

Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor

LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
| Criterion | Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor | LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(42,572)Amazon | ★4.6(1,104)Amazon |
Screen Size | 21.5" Viewable | 34" Viewable (34" Class) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 3440 x 1440 (WQHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 21:9 |
Screen Type | IPS (In-Plane Switching) | VA (Vertical Alignment) |
Refresh Rate | 75 Hz (via HDMI) / 60 Hz (via VGA) | 160 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 100 Hz (via HDMI) |
Response Time | 4 ms (GtG) | 5 ms (GtG Faster) / 1 ms (MBR) |
Brightness | 250 nits (cd/m²) | 300 nits (Typical) / 240 nits (Min) |
Contrast | 1,000:1 (Static) / 100,000,000:1 (Dynamic) | 3,000:1 (Typical) |
Color Gamut | 72% NTSC (Approx. 99% sRGB) | 99% sRGB (CIE1931) |
Color Depth | 16.7M (6-bit + FRC) | 1.07 Billion (10-bit) |
HDR | No (Not supported) | HDR10 |
Adaptive Sync | AMD Radeon FreeSync (48-75Hz range via HDMI) | AMD FreeSync Premium |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | 1800R |
Speakers | No (None) | No (None) |
Ports | 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x VGA | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | No (Not VESA compatible) | 100 x 100 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 15°) | Tilt only (-5° to 15°) |
Power Consumption | 24 W (Typical) / 0.45 W (Standby) | 42 W (Typical) / 45 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Sleep) |
Weight With Stand | 2,480 g (5.47 lbs) | 6,800 g (14.99 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor
21.5" Viewable
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
75 Hz (via HDMI) / 60 Hz (via VGA)
4 ms (GtG)
Pros
- Ultra-thin 'Zero Frame' design looks modern and saves desk space
- IPS panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles (178°)
Cons
- Lacks VESA mount compatibility (cannot be mounted on arms or walls)
- No built-in audio or headphone jack

LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
34" Viewable (34" Class)
3440 x 1440 (WQHD)
21:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
160 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 100 Hz (via HDMI)
5 ms (GtG Faster) / 1 ms (MBR)
Pros
- Expansive 21:9 WQHD resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9
- High 160Hz refresh rate (via DisplayPort) delivers fluid motion for gaming
Cons
- Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments
- HDMI ports are version 2.0, limiting refresh rate to 100Hz at native resolution
Which one is better?
The LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor is the better buy for most people - its expansive 3440 x 1440 resolution crushes the Acer SB220Q bi's 1920 x 1080. That said, grab the Acer if you want to save money and just need an impressive display for basic tasks.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor if: you need a budget-friendly option, want a lightweight display for easy relocation, or are setting up a compact workspace. (21.5" display, 75 Hz refresh)
Choose the LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor if: you game frequently and want a smooth 160Hz experience, you edit videos or photos needing higher resolution, or you multitask with multiple windows open.
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 42,572 reviews vs 1,104
→ Choose Acer SB220Q
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose LG 34WP60C-B
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose Acer SB220Q
Ultra-thin 'Zero Frame' Priority
Ultra-thin 'Zero Frame' design looks modern and saves desk space
→ Choose Acer SB220Q
Conclusion
There is no wrong answer here. Focus on the features you will use daily and pick the model that aligns with them.
Bottom line: Both products share a 4.6★ rating, making this comparison particularly close. Your decision should come down to which specific features matter most to you.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor or LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor?
Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize ultra-thin 'zero frame' design looks modern and saves desk space. LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor wins if you value expansive 21:9 wqhd resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9. Both are rated highly (4.6★ vs 4.6★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor and LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor?
Key differences: Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor offers ultra-thin 'zero frame' design looks modern and saves desk space, while LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor stands out with expansive 21:9 wqhd resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9. Consider that Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor lacks vesa mount compatibility (cannot be mounted on arms or walls). Meanwhile, LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
