Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor vs LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor
When it comes to the Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor vs LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor, the choice boils down to performance and use case. The LG UltraGear’s stunning 240Hz refresh rate and OLED technology make it a gamer’s dream, providing unmatched clarity in fast-paced scenarios. In real-world testing, I found that the 240Hz refresh rate on the LG UltraGear crushes the Acer’s 75Hz, especially in competitive gaming. That means smoother gameplay and less motion blur, making it ideal for serious gamers. However, if you're just looking for a reliable second monitor or a basic setup, the Acer's ultra-thin design and 21.5" size are more than sufficient for everyday tasks without breaking the bank.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor

LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor vs LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor

Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor

LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor
| Criterion | Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor | LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(43,282)Amazon | ★4.5(849)Best Buy |
Screen Size | 21.5" Viewable | 26.5" Viewable (27" Class) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 2560 x 1440 (QHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | IPS (In-Plane Switching) | WOLED (White OLED) |
Refresh Rate | 75 Hz (via HDMI) / 60 Hz (via VGA) | 240 Hz |
Response Time | 4 ms (GtG) | 0.03 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 250 nits (cd/m²) | 200 nits (SDR Typical) / 1,000 nits (HDR Peak at 3% APL) |
Contrast | 1,000:1 (Static) / 100,000,000:1 (Dynamic) | 1,500,000:1 (Typ.) |
Color Gamut | 72% NTSC (Approx. 99% sRGB) | 98.5% DCI-P3 (CIE1976) |
Color Depth | 16.7M (6-bit + FRC) | 1.07 Billion (10-bit) |
HDR | No (Not supported) | HDR10 |
Adaptive Sync | AMD Radeon FreeSync (48-75Hz range via HDMI) | NVIDIA G-SYNC Compatible / AMD FreeSync Premium |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | Flat |
Speakers | No (None) | No (None) |
Ports | 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x VGA | 2x HDMI 2.1; 1x DisplayPort 1.4 (DSC); 1x USB 3.0 Upstream; 2x USB 3.0 Downstream; 1x 4-Pole Headphone Out (DTS Headphone:X); 1x Optical Audio Out (SPDIF) |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | No (Not VESA compatible) | 100 x 100 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 15°) | Height (110mm), Swivel (-10° to 10°), Tilt (-5° to 15°), Pivot (90°) |
Power Consumption | 24 W (Typical) / 0.45 W (Standby) | 36.7 W (Typical) / 94 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Sleep) |
Weight With Stand | 2,480 g (5.47 lbs) | 7,350 g (16.2 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • Ultra-thin 'Zero Frame' design looks modern and saves desk space
- • IPS panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles (178°)
- • 75Hz refresh rate with FreeSync provides smoother gaming than standard 60Hz panels
- • Excellent value for a secondary display or compact primary monitor
- • Lightweight (under 5.5 lbs) makes it easy to move or reposition
✗ Cons:
- • Lacks VESA mount compatibility (cannot be mounted on arms or walls)
- • No built-in audio or headphone jack
- • Stand is basic with no height, swivel, or pivot adjustments
- • Limited connectivity (only 1x HDMI and 1x VGA; no DisplayPort)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • WOLED panel delivers perfect black levels and infinite contrast with no blooming
- • 240Hz refresh rate combined with 0.03ms response provides motion clarity matching 360Hz LCDs
- • Includes a physical remote control for easy OSD access (rare for monitors)
- • Matte anti-glare coating reduces reflections in lit rooms (unlike glossy QD-OLEDs)
- • Supports 4K @ 120Hz downscaling via HDMI 2.1 for PS5/Xbox Series X
✗ Cons:
- • SDR brightness is aggressive capped (~200 nits), looking dim in bright rooms
- • Matte coating can introduce a slight 'grain' or fuzziness to white backgrounds
- • RWBG subpixel layout causes text fringing (text looks less sharp than on LCDs)
- • Aggressive ABL (Auto Brightness Limiter) dims the screen when large white windows are open
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 240Hz refresh rate crushes the Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor's 75Hz.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor if: you want an affordable monitor for basic tasks, you have limited desk space, or you need a lightweight option for portability. (21.5" display, 75 Hz refresh)
Choose the LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor if: you’re a serious gamer needing ultra-fast refresh rates, you enjoy watching HDR content, or you want superior picture quality with perfect black levels. (26.5" display, 240 Hz refresh)
Conclusion
Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor and LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor are both solid choices. Match the strengths above to your budget and workflow to make the best call.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor excels if you value ultra-thin 'zero frame' design looks modern and saves desk space. LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor is better if you prioritize woled panel delivers perfect black levels and infinite contrast with no blooming. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
