Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor vs SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor
In the battle between the Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor and the SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor, the latter takes the lead. With a jaw-dropping 2560 x 1440 resolution and a blistering 165Hz refresh rate, the SAMSUNG monitor is designed for immersive gaming experiences and sharp visuals, making it worth the upgrade for serious gamers. Meanwhile, the Acer SB220Q is the budget-friendly option, featuring a compact 21.5" FHD display that still delivers vibrant colors from its IPS panel. However, its limited 75Hz refresh rate and absence of VESA mount compatibility might leave some users wanting more, especially if they're considering a larger setup or gaming at high speeds. Key specs: Display: 21.5" vs 32" and Refresh: 75 Hz vs 165 Hz.
Why compare these? The Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor (budget-friendly) and SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor (mid-range) represent different approaches to monitors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Acer SB220Q | SAMSUNG Odyssey |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | ✓4.6★ (42,572 reviews) | 4.4★ (2,537 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Ultra-thin 'Zero Frame' design looks modern and saves desk space | Aggressive 1000R curvature matches the human eye's field of view for maximum immersion |
| Main Drawback | Lacks VESA mount compatibility (cannot be mounted on arms or walls) | Stand is basic with Tilt-only adjustment (no height or swivel) |
| Market Position | Budget | ✓Mid-range |
Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor
21.5" Viewable
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor
32" Class (31.5" Viewable)
2560 x 1440 (WQHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor vs SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor
Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor
SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor
| Criterion | Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor | SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(42,572)Amazon | ★4.4(2,537)Amazon |
Screen Size | 21.5" Viewable | 32" Class (31.5" Viewable) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 2560 x 1440 (WQHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | IPS (In-Plane Switching) | VA (Vertical Alignment) |
Refresh Rate | 75 Hz (via HDMI) / 60 Hz (via VGA) | 165 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 144 Hz (via HDMI) |
Response Time | 4 ms (GtG) | 1 ms (MPRT) |
Brightness | 250 nits (cd/m²) | 300 nits (Typical) / 200 nits (Min) |
Contrast | 1,000:1 (Static) / 100,000,000:1 (Dynamic) | 2,500:1 (Static) |
Color Gamut | 72% NTSC (Approx. 99% sRGB) | Not officially specified (Approx. 99% sRGB) |
Color Depth | 16.7M (6-bit + FRC) | 16.7M (8-bit) |
HDR | No (Not supported) | HDR10 (Software support) |
Adaptive Sync | AMD Radeon FreeSync (48-75Hz range via HDMI) | AMD FreeSync Premium |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | 1000R |
Speakers | No (None) | No (None) |
Ports | 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x VGA | 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x HDMI 2.0; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out; 1x USB (Service only) |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | No (Not VESA compatible) | 75 x 75 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 15°) | Tilt only (-2° to 18°) |
Power Consumption | 24 W (Typical) / 0.45 W (Standby) | 39 W (Typical) / 59 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) |
Weight With Stand | 2,480 g (5.47 lbs) | 5,700 g (12.57 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor
21.5" Viewable
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
75 Hz (via HDMI) / 60 Hz (via VGA)
4 ms (GtG)
Pros
- Ultra-thin 'Zero Frame' design looks modern and saves desk space
- IPS panel ensures consistent colors and wide viewing angles (178°)
Cons
- Lacks VESA mount compatibility (cannot be mounted on arms or walls)
- No built-in audio or headphone jack
SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor
32" Class (31.5" Viewable)
2560 x 1440 (WQHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
165 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 144 Hz (via HDMI)
1 ms (MPRT)
Pros
- Aggressive 1000R curvature matches the human eye's field of view for maximum immersion
- 165Hz refresh rate and 1ms (MPRT) deliver smooth, responsive gameplay
Cons
- Stand is basic with Tilt-only adjustment (no height or swivel)
- Brightness (300 nits) is insufficient for a impactful HDR experience
Which one is better?
The SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 2560 x 1440 resolution and 165Hz refresh rate crush the Acer SB220Q.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor if: you need a budget-friendly option for basic tasks, want a lightweight monitor for easy movement, or prefer a compact design for a small desk. (21.5" display, 75 Hz refresh)
Choose the SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor if: you game frequently and want an immersive experience with a curved display, require a high refresh rate for competitive gaming, or need a larger screen for multitasking. (32" display, 165 Hz refresh)
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.4★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose Acer SB220Q
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 42,572 reviews vs 2,537
→ Choose Acer SB220Q
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose SAMSUNG Odyssey
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose Acer SB220Q
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Bottom line: The Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor edges ahead with a 4.6★ rating compared to 4.4★. However, SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor remains a strong contender if its strengths align better with your needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor or SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor?
Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize ultra-thin 'zero frame' design looks modern and saves desk space. SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor wins if you value aggressive 1000r curvature matches the human eye's field of view for maximum immersion. Both are rated highly (4.6★ vs 4.4★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor and SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor?
Key differences: Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor offers ultra-thin 'zero frame' design looks modern and saves desk space, while SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor stands out with aggressive 1000r curvature matches the human eye's field of view for maximum immersion. Consider that Acer SB220Q bi 21.5" FHD IPS Monitor lacks vesa mount compatibility (cannot be mounted on arms or walls). Meanwhile, SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor stand is basic with tilt-only adjustment (no height or swivel). Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.