Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor vs Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor
If you're looking for a flagship gaming experience, the Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor crushes the Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor with its stunning 3440 x 1440 resolution and 0.1ms response time. This means zero motion blur in fast-paced games, making it an absolute dream for serious gamers. For those wanting versatility without breaking the bank, the Acer Nitro XV275K P5 offers a clever Dual Mode, allowing you to switch between 4K 160Hz and ultra-fast 1080p 320Hz. In real-world use, this flexibility can be a game-changer if you plan to use your monitor for both gaming and creative work, especially with its excellent color accuracy covering 99% AdobeRGB.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor vs Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor
Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor
Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor
| Criterion | Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor | Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.8(1,501)Best Buy | ★3.8(32)Amazon |
Screen Size | 34.18" Viewable (34" Class) | 27" (68.6 cm) |
Resolution | 3440 x 1440 (UWQHD) | 3840 x 2160 (4K UHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 21:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | QD-OLED (Quantum Dot OLED) | IPS (Mini-LED backlight) |
Refresh Rate | 165 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 100 Hz (via HDMI 2.0) | 160 Hz (4K); 320 Hz (1080p via DFR Dual Mode) |
Response Time | 0.1 ms (GtG) | 1 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 250 nits (Typical SDR) / 1,000 nits (Peak HDR) | 600 cd/m² (Typical); 1000 cd/m² (HDR Peak) |
Contrast | 1,000,000:1 (Infinite) | 1,000:1 (Native); 100,000,000:1 (ACM Dynamic) |
Color Gamut | 99.3% DCI-P3 / 149% sRGB | 99% AdobeRGB; 95% DCI-P3 |
Color Depth | 1.07 Billion (10-bit) | 10-bit (8-bit + FRC) |
HDR | VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400 (Peak 1000 Mode available) | VESA DisplayHDR 1000 (HDR10) |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync Premium Pro (VRR 48-165Hz) | AMD FreeSync Premium |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | 1800R | No (Flat panel) |
Speakers | No (None) | Yes (2x 3W) |
Ports | 2x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x HDMI 2.0; 1x USB-B Upstream; 4x USB-A Downstream (5 Gbps); 1x Audio Line-out; 1x Headphone Out | 2x HDMI 2.1; 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x USB-C (DP Alt Mode, 90W PD); 2x USB-A 3.0 (Downstream); 1x USB-B (Upstream); 1x 3.5mm Audio Out |
USB C | No | Yes (DP Alt Mode, Data, 90W Power Delivery) |
Kvm | No | Yes (Built-in KVM switch) |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 75 x 75 mm |
Ergonomics | Height (110mm), Swivel (-20° to 20°), Tilt (-5° to 21°), Slant (-5° to 5°) | Tilt (-5° to 25°); Swivel (±25°); Height adj. (150 mm); Pivot (±90°) |
Power Consumption | 34 W (Typical) / 200 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) | 35 W (Standard); 230 W (Max with USB-C charging) |
Weight With Stand | 9,650 g (21.27 lbs) | 6,720 g (14.82 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • QD-OLED panel delivers infinite contrast and perfect blacks with no blooming
- • Instantaneous 0.1ms response time ensures zero motion blur in fast-paced games
- • Includes a 3-year manufacturer warranty that explicitly covers OLED burn-in
- • Glossy screen coating makes colors appear significantly more vibrant than matte equivalents
- • Quieter operation than the 'DW' model (uses a single fan vs. two)
✗ Cons:
- • HDMI port is version 2.0, limiting native resolution output to 100Hz (console support varies)
- • Non-standard triangular subpixel layout can cause text fringing (purple/green edges) on text
- • OLED panels carry a risk of burn-in with static elements (though mitigated by pixel shift tech)
- • Raised black levels can occur in bright rooms due to the lack of a polarizing layer
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • Innovative Dual Mode: Switch between high-res 4K 160Hz or ultra-fast 1080p 320Hz
- • Mini-LED backlight with 576 local dimming zones delivers deep blacks and high brightness
- • Full-featured USB-C hub with 90W Power Delivery and built-in KVM switch
- • Excellent color accuracy covering 99% AdobeRGB, suitable for content creation
- • Fully adjustable ergonomic stand with portrait mode (pivot) support
✗ Cons:
- • OSD menu navigation can be clunky compared to competitors
- • Local dimming (576 zones) may show slight blooming compared to higher-tier 1000+ zone panels
- • Stand has a wide footprint, requiring significant desk depth
- • Viewing angles, while good, are slightly narrower than standard IPS due to the Mini-LED layer
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 0.1ms response time crushes the Acer Nitro XV275K P5. That said, grab the Acer if you need a versatile monitor for both gaming and productivity - it's a more affordable option for a well-rounded experience.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor if: you want the best gaming performance with zero motion blur, you play fast-paced games often, or you prioritize stunning color accuracy. (34.18" display, 165 Hz refresh)
Choose the Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor if: you need a versatile display for gaming and creative work, you want to save money, or you prefer a compact design with a built-in KVM switch. (27" display, 320 Hz refresh)
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor excels if you value qd-oled panel delivers infinite contrast and perfect blacks with no blooming. Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor is better if you prioritize innovative dual mode: switch between high-res 4k 160hz or ultra-fast 1080p 320hz. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.