← Back to Monitors
2026 comparison
Updated Jan 6, 2026
|Sources: Amazon, Manufacturer

Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor vs Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor

If you're after the best gaming experience, the Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor is the clear winner with its stunning 3440x1440 resolution and 0.1ms response time. In contrast, while the Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor offers a budget-friendly 200Hz refresh rate, its lower 2560x1080 resolution falls short for serious gaming in 2026. In real-world use, the Alienware’s QD-OLED panel provides infinite contrast and vibrant colors, making every detail pop. The trade-off is that while the Sceptre has a faster refresh rate of 200Hz—ideal for FPS games—its lower pixel density means text and graphics might not look as sharp. So, if clarity and color richness are essential for you, the Alienware is worth the investment.

📱 Display: 34.18" vs 30"⚡ Refresh: 165 Hz vs 200 Hz⚖️ Weight: 340.39 oz vs 218.70 oz

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor
Screen Size:34.18" Viewable (34" Class)
Resolution:3440 x 1440 (UWQHD)
Aspect Ratio:21:9
Screen Type:QD-OLED (Quantum Dot OLED)
Check Amazon Price
Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor
Screen Size:30" Diagonal Viewable
Resolution:2560 x 1080 (WFHD)
Aspect Ratio:21:9
Screen Type:VA (Vertical Alignment)
Check Amazon Price
Key spec differences

Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.

Display2 specs
Refresh Rate
Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor
165 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 100 Hz (via HDMI 2.0)
Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor
200 Hz (DisplayPort); 165 Hz (HDMI 2.0); 75 Hz (HDMI 1.4)Winner
Resolution
Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor
3440 x 1440 (UWQHD)
Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor
2560 x 1080 (WFHD)
+

Full specs, pros, and cons

Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.

Comparison: Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor vs Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor

Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor

Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor

4.8(1,501)Best Buy
Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor

Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor

4.5(162)Amazon
Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor

Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor

Rating:4.8(1,501)Best Buy
Screen Size:34.18" Viewable (34" Class)
Resolution:3440 x 1440 (UWQHD)
Aspect Ratio:21:9
Screen Type:QD-OLED (Quantum Dot OLED)
Refresh Rate:165 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 100 Hz (via HDMI 2.0)
Response Time:0.1 ms (GtG)
Brightness:250 nits (Typical SDR) / 1,000 nits (Peak HDR)
Contrast:1,000,000:1 (Infinite)
Color Gamut:99.3% DCI-P3 / 149% sRGB
Color Depth:1.07 Billion (10-bit)
HDR:VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400 (Peak 1000 Mode available)
Adaptive Sync:AMD FreeSync Premium Pro (VRR 48-165Hz)
Viewing Angles:178° (H) / 178° (V)
Curvature:1800R
Speakers:No (None)
Ports:2x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x HDMI 2.0; 1x USB-B Upstream; 4x USB-A Downstream (5 Gbps); 1x Audio Line-out; 1x Headphone Out
USB C:No
Kvm:No
Vesa:100 x 100 mm
Ergonomics:Height (110mm), Swivel (-20° to 20°), Tilt (-5° to 21°), Slant (-5° to 5°)
Power Consumption:34 W (Typical) / 200 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby)
Weight With Stand:9,650 g (21.27 lbs)

✓ Pros:

  • QD-OLED panel delivers infinite contrast and perfect blacks with no blooming
  • Instantaneous 0.1ms response time ensures zero motion blur in fast-paced games
  • Includes a 3-year manufacturer warranty that explicitly covers OLED burn-in
  • Glossy screen coating makes colors appear significantly more vibrant than matte equivalents
  • Quieter operation than the 'DW' model (uses a single fan vs. two)

✗ Cons:

  • HDMI port is version 2.0, limiting native resolution output to 100Hz (console support varies)
  • Non-standard triangular subpixel layout can cause text fringing (purple/green edges) on text
  • OLED panels carry a risk of burn-in with static elements (though mitigated by pixel shift tech)
  • Raised black levels can occur in bright rooms due to the lack of a polarizing layer

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Check Price on Amazon
Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor

Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor

Rating:4.5(162)Amazon
Screen Size:30" Diagonal Viewable
Resolution:2560 x 1080 (WFHD)
Aspect Ratio:21:9
Screen Type:VA (Vertical Alignment)
Refresh Rate:200 Hz (DisplayPort); 165 Hz (HDMI 2.0); 75 Hz (HDMI 1.4)
Response Time:5 ms (GtG); 1 ms (MPRT / Blur Reduction)
Brightness:320 cd/m² (Typical)
Contrast:3,000:1 (Static)
Color Gamut:99% sRGB
Color Depth:16.7M (8-bit)
HDR:Yes (HDR400 Signal Support; Edge-lit)
Adaptive Sync:AMD FreeSync Premium
Viewing Angles:178° (H) / 178° (V)
Curvature:1500R
Speakers:Yes (2x 3W, 4Ω)
Ports:1x DisplayPort 1.2 (200Hz); 1x HDMI 2.0 (165Hz); 2x HDMI 1.4 (75Hz); 1x 3.5mm Audio Out
USB C:No
Kvm:No
Vesa:75 x 75 mm
Ergonomics:Height adj. (4.08" - 8.61"); Tilt (-5° to 20°); Swivel (±25°)
Power Consumption:45 W (Typical); 52 W (Max)
Weight With Stand:6,200 g (13.67 lbs)

✓ Pros:

  • High-speed 200Hz refresh rate (via DisplayPort) provides fluid motion for racing and FPS games
  • Deep 3,000:1 contrast ratio typical of VA panels creates rich blacks
  • Versatile connectivity with 4 total video inputs (1x DP, 3x HDMI)
  • Includes a fully adjustable stand (Height, Tilt, Swivel) which is rare at this price point
  • Unique white chassis ('Nebula White') stands out from standard black monitors

✗ Cons:

  • Resolution (2560x1080) has lower pixel density than 1440p, making text look less sharp
  • HDMI ports are limited to lower refresh rates (165Hz and 75Hz) compared to DisplayPort
  • VA panel technology causes some 'black smearing' in dark transitions compared to IPS
  • HDR performance is entry-level due to edge-lit dimming and limited peak brightness
  • Stand footprint is somewhat deep, requiring ample desk space

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Check Price on Amazon

Which one is better?

The Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 3440x1440 resolution crushes the Sceptre’s 2560x1080.

Who should buy each?

Choose the Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor if: you want stunning visual clarity with 3440x1440 resolution, you play competitive games requiring fast response times, or you appreciate vibrant colors for media consumption.
Choose the Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor if: you need a high refresh rate for fast-paced gaming, you’re on a budget, or you prefer a more compact monitor for limited desk space. (30" display, 200 Hz refresh)

Conclusion

We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.

Frequently Asked Questions

+Which has better value?

Alienware AW3423DWF 34" QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor excels if you value qd-oled panel delivers infinite contrast and perfect blacks with no blooming. Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor is better if you prioritize high-speed 200hz refresh rate (via displayport) provides fluid motion for racing and fps games. Pick based on your budget and daily use.

+Is this an independent review?

Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.

+Do newer models exist?

Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.

Affiliate disclosure

PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.