Amazfit Falcon vs Suunto Race
The Amazfit Falcon is the better buy for most people, thanks to its impressive 20 ATM water resistance, which is double that of the Suunto Race's 10 ATM. In real-world use, this means you can confidently swim or snorkel without worry, while the Suunto Race is more suited for shallow water activities. If battery life is your top priority, the Suunto Race shines with up to 40 hours in max GPS mode compared to the Amazfit Falcon's 21 hours. This makes it ideal for long hiking trips or endurance events where charging isn't an option.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Amazfit Falcon

Suunto Race
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Amazfit Falcon vs Suunto Race

Amazfit Falcon

Suunto Race
| Criterion | Amazfit Falcon | Suunto Race |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.4(557)Amazon | ★4.2(297)Amazon |
Compatibility | Android 7.0 or later; iOS 12.0 or later (Zepp App required) | Android and iOS (via Suunto app) |
Operating System | Zepp OS (Proprietary) | Suunto UI |
Case Size | 49mm (49.45 x 47.2 x 12.95 mm) | 49mm (49 x 49 x 13.3 mm / 1.93 x 1.93 x 0.52 in) |
Case Material | Titanium unibody; Sapphire Crystal glass; Titanium bezel | Bezel: Stainless Steel; Case: Glass fiber reinforced polyamide; Glass: Sapphire crystal; Strap: Silicone |
Display Type | AMOLED; Always-On Display supported; Anti-fingerprint coating | AMOLED touchscreen (High definition, always-on capable) |
Display Size | 1.28 in (32.5 mm) diameter | 1.43 in |
Resolution | 416 x 416 pixels (326 ppi) | 466 x 466 pixels (1,000 nits brightness) |
Always On Display | Yes | Yes |
Water Resistance | 20 ATM (water pressure equivalent to 200 meters); High-speed water sports capable | 100 m (10 ATM) |
Durability | MIL-STD-810G tested; Titanium unibody; Sapphire crystal screen | MIL-STD-810H tested; Operating temp: -20°C to +55°C (-5°F to +130°F) |
GPS | Dual-band GNSS; 6 Satellite Positioning Systems (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NAVIC) | Dual-band GNSS (L1 + L5); GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BEIDOU |
Connectivity | WLAN 2.4GHz; Bluetooth 5.0 BLE | Bluetooth, Wi-Fi (for map downloads) |
NFC Payments | No | No (Not supported) |
Sensors | BioTracker™ 3.0 PPG biometric sensor (supports blood-oxygen, 6PD); Accelerometer; Gyroscope; Geomagnetic sensor; Barometric altimeter; Ambient light sensor | Optical heart rate; blood oxygen (SpO2); barometric altimeter; digital compass; accelerometer; gyroscope |
Health Features | Zepp Coach (AI-powered training guidance); 24H Heart Rate; SpO2; Stress monitoring; Sleep tracking (Light, Deep, REM); SomnusCare™ sleep score; Breathing exercises | HRV measurement (Sleep & Daily); 24/7 heart rate; sleep tracking (stages & quality); blood oxygen; stress and recovery status |
Workout Modes | Triathlon; Track Run (with lap data correction); Strength Training (auto-detection of 25 movements); Golf Swing; Skiing; High-speed water sports; and 150+ others | 95+ sport modes; Suunto Coach (AI-based training load & recovery); offline maps; route navigation; race time estimates |
Storage | 4GB total (Approx. 2.3GB user-accessible for music) | 16 GB (Steel model) / 32 GB (Titanium model) |
Speaker Mic | None (Bluetooth headphones required for music/audio feedback) | No (No built-in speaker or microphone) |
Calls | No (Notification alerts only) | No (Notification alerts only) |
Battery | 500 mAh; Up to 14 days (Typical usage); Up to 7 days (Heavy usage); Up to 21 hours (Accuracy GPS mode); Up to 50 hours (Power Saving GPS mode) | Up to 26 days (Daily Mode); Up to 12 days (Daily HR + AOD); 40 hours (Performance Training / Dual-band GNSS) |
Charging | 5-pin plug charger; Approx. 2 hours to full charge | Suunto magnetic fast charger (USB-A) |
Weight | 64 g (Body only) | 83 g / 2.93 oz (Steel model) |
Band Sizes | 22mm width; Fits 150–205 mm wrists (Liquid Silicone strap included) | Fits wrist sizes 125–175 mm; standard 22 mm quick-release width |
Extras | Offline Maps (Import route files); Real-time navigation; Music storage (MP3); Broadcast heart rate via Bluetooth; External workout device support (Heart rate belts, power meters) | Global offline outdoor maps (free); weather widgets; phone media controls; customizable watch faces; digital crown navigation |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

Amazfit Falcon
✓ Pros:
- • Elite build quality: Titanium unibody with Sapphire Crystal
- • 20 ATM water resistance is double that of most outdoor watches
- • Dual-band GPS with 6 satellite systems ensures precise tracking
- • Offline music storage allows phone-free running
- • Zepp Coach provides AI-driven training plans without a subscription
✗ Cons:
- • Uses older BioTracker 3.0 sensor (newer models use 5.0/6.0)
- • No speaker or microphone for calls or voice assistants
- • Display size (1.28") is smaller than T-Rex 3 or GTR 4
- • No NFC payment support
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Suunto Race
✓ Pros:
- • Vibrant 1.43” AMOLED screen with sapphire crystal durability
- • Excellent battery life (up to 40 hours in max accuracy GPS mode)
- • Free global offline maps with intuitive digital crown zooming
- • Dual-band GNSS provides highly accurate tracking in difficult terrain
- • Military-grade (MIL-STD-810H) durability
✗ Cons:
- • No NFC payments or music storage (music controls only)
- • No built-in speaker or microphone for calls
- • 49mm case size is bulky for smaller wrists
- • Steel version is noticeably heavier (83g) than the Titanium model (69g)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The Amazfit Falcon is the better buy for most people - its 20 ATM water resistance crushes the Suunto Race's 10 ATM. That said, grab the Suunto Race if you need more battery life for long outings - it offers 40 hours in max GPS mode compared to the Falcon's 21 hours.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Amazfit Falcon if: you want the ultimate in water resistance for swimming, need robust offline music storage for workouts, or prefer a lighter watch at 2.26oz.
Choose the Suunto Race if: you prioritize battery longevity for long adventures, appreciate a larger display at 1.43in, or want free global offline maps for navigation.
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
Amazfit Falcon excels if you value elite build quality: titanium unibody with sapphire crystal. Suunto Race is better if you prioritize vibrant 1.43” amoled screen with sapphire crystal durability. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
