← Back to Smartwatches
2026 comparison
Updated Jan 7, 2026
|Sources: Amazon, Manufacturer

Amazfit Falcon vs Suunto Race

The Amazfit Falcon is the better buy for most people, thanks to its impressive 20 ATM water resistance, which is double that of the Suunto Race's 10 ATM. In real-world use, this means you can confidently swim or snorkel without worry, while the Suunto Race is more suited for shallow water activities. If battery life is your top priority, the Suunto Race shines with up to 40 hours in max GPS mode compared to the Amazfit Falcon's 21 hours. This makes it ideal for long hiking trips or endurance events where charging isn't an option.

⚖️ Weight: 2.26 oz vs 2.93 oz💽 Storage: 4 GB vs 16 GB💧 Water Resistance: 200m vs 100m

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Amazfit Falcon

Amazfit Falcon

4.4
(557)Amazon
Compatibility:Android 7.0 or later; iOS 12.0 or later (Zepp App required)
Operating System:Zepp OS (Proprietary)
Case Size:49mm (49.45 x 47.2 x 12.95 mm)
Case Material:Titanium unibody; Sapphire Crystal glass; Titanium bezel
Check Amazon Price
Suunto Race

Suunto Race

4.2
(297)Amazon
Compatibility:Android and iOS (via Suunto app)
Operating System:Suunto UI
Case Size:49mm (49 x 49 x 13.3 mm / 1.93 x 1.93 x 0.52 in)
Case Material:Bezel: Stainless Steel; Case: Glass fiber reinforced polyamide; Glass: Sapphire crystal; Strap: Silicone
Check Amazon Price
Key spec differences

Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.

Display2 specs
Display SizeKey
Amazfit Falcon
1.28 in (32.5 mm) diameter
Suunto Race
1.43 in
Resolution
Amazfit Falcon
416 x 416 pixels (326 ppi)
Suunto Race
466 x 466 pixels (1,000 nits brightness)
Performance1 specs
Storage
Amazfit Falcon
4GB total (Approx. 2.3GB user-accessible for music)
Suunto Race
16 GB (Steel model) / 32 GB (Titanium model)Winner
Battery1 specs
Battery CapacityKey
Amazfit Falcon
500 mAh; Up to 14 days (Typical usage); Up to 7 days (Heavy usage); Up to 21 hours (Accuracy GPS mode); Up to 50 hours (Power Saving GPS mode)
Suunto Race
Up to 26 days (Daily Mode); Up to 12 days (Daily HR + AOD); 40 hours (Performance Training / Dual-band GNSS)
Design2 specs
Weight
Amazfit Falcon
64 g (Body only)Winner
Suunto Race
83 g / 2.93 oz (Steel model)
Water Resistance
Amazfit Falcon
20 ATM (water pressure equivalent to 200 meters); High-speed water sports capable
Suunto Race
100 m (10 ATM)
Software1 specs
Operating System
Amazfit Falcon
Zepp OS (Proprietary)
Suunto Race
Suunto UI
Connectivity1 specs
Connectivity
Amazfit Falcon
WLAN 2.4GHz; Bluetooth 5.0 BLE
Suunto Race
Bluetooth, Wi-Fi (for map downloads)
+

Full specs, pros, and cons

Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.

Comparison: Amazfit Falcon vs Suunto Race

Amazfit Falcon

Amazfit Falcon

4.4(557)Amazon
Suunto Race

Suunto Race

4.2(297)Amazon
Amazfit Falcon

Amazfit Falcon

Rating:4.4(557)Amazon
Compatibility:Android 7.0 or later; iOS 12.0 or later (Zepp App required)
Operating System:Zepp OS (Proprietary)
Case Size:49mm (49.45 x 47.2 x 12.95 mm)
Case Material:Titanium unibody; Sapphire Crystal glass; Titanium bezel
Display Type:AMOLED; Always-On Display supported; Anti-fingerprint coating
Display Size:1.28 in (32.5 mm) diameter
Resolution:416 x 416 pixels (326 ppi)
Always On Display:Yes
Water Resistance:20 ATM (water pressure equivalent to 200 meters); High-speed water sports capable
Durability:MIL-STD-810G tested; Titanium unibody; Sapphire crystal screen
GPS:Dual-band GNSS; 6 Satellite Positioning Systems (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NAVIC)
Connectivity:WLAN 2.4GHz; Bluetooth 5.0 BLE
NFC Payments:No
Sensors:BioTracker™ 3.0 PPG biometric sensor (supports blood-oxygen, 6PD); Accelerometer; Gyroscope; Geomagnetic sensor; Barometric altimeter; Ambient light sensor
Health Features:Zepp Coach (AI-powered training guidance); 24H Heart Rate; SpO2; Stress monitoring; Sleep tracking (Light, Deep, REM); SomnusCare™ sleep score; Breathing exercises
Workout Modes:Triathlon; Track Run (with lap data correction); Strength Training (auto-detection of 25 movements); Golf Swing; Skiing; High-speed water sports; and 150+ others
Storage:4GB total (Approx. 2.3GB user-accessible for music)
Speaker Mic:None (Bluetooth headphones required for music/audio feedback)
Calls:No (Notification alerts only)
Battery:500 mAh; Up to 14 days (Typical usage); Up to 7 days (Heavy usage); Up to 21 hours (Accuracy GPS mode); Up to 50 hours (Power Saving GPS mode)
Charging:5-pin plug charger; Approx. 2 hours to full charge
Weight:64 g (Body only)
Band Sizes:22mm width; Fits 150–205 mm wrists (Liquid Silicone strap included)
Extras:Offline Maps (Import route files); Real-time navigation; Music storage (MP3); Broadcast heart rate via Bluetooth; External workout device support (Heart rate belts, power meters)

✓ Pros:

  • Elite build quality: Titanium unibody with Sapphire Crystal
  • 20 ATM water resistance is double that of most outdoor watches
  • Dual-band GPS with 6 satellite systems ensures precise tracking
  • Offline music storage allows phone-free running
  • Zepp Coach provides AI-driven training plans without a subscription

✗ Cons:

  • Uses older BioTracker 3.0 sensor (newer models use 5.0/6.0)
  • No speaker or microphone for calls or voice assistants
  • Display size (1.28") is smaller than T-Rex 3 or GTR 4
  • No NFC payment support

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Check Price on Amazon
Suunto Race

Suunto Race

Rating:4.2(297)Amazon
Compatibility:Android and iOS (via Suunto app)
Operating System:Suunto UI
Case Size:49mm (49 x 49 x 13.3 mm / 1.93 x 1.93 x 0.52 in)
Case Material:Bezel: Stainless Steel; Case: Glass fiber reinforced polyamide; Glass: Sapphire crystal; Strap: Silicone
Display Type:AMOLED touchscreen (High definition, always-on capable)
Display Size:1.43 in
Resolution:466 x 466 pixels (1,000 nits brightness)
Always On Display:Yes
Water Resistance:100 m (10 ATM)
Durability:MIL-STD-810H tested; Operating temp: -20°C to +55°C (-5°F to +130°F)
GPS:Dual-band GNSS (L1 + L5); GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BEIDOU
Connectivity:Bluetooth, Wi-Fi (for map downloads)
NFC Payments:No (Not supported)
Sensors:Optical heart rate; blood oxygen (SpO2); barometric altimeter; digital compass; accelerometer; gyroscope
Health Features:HRV measurement (Sleep & Daily); 24/7 heart rate; sleep tracking (stages & quality); blood oxygen; stress and recovery status
Workout Modes:95+ sport modes; Suunto Coach (AI-based training load & recovery); offline maps; route navigation; race time estimates
Storage:16 GB (Steel model) / 32 GB (Titanium model)
Speaker Mic:No (No built-in speaker or microphone)
Calls:No (Notification alerts only)
Battery:Up to 26 days (Daily Mode); Up to 12 days (Daily HR + AOD); 40 hours (Performance Training / Dual-band GNSS)
Charging:Suunto magnetic fast charger (USB-A)
Weight:83 g / 2.93 oz (Steel model)
Band Sizes:Fits wrist sizes 125–175 mm; standard 22 mm quick-release width
Extras:Global offline outdoor maps (free); weather widgets; phone media controls; customizable watch faces; digital crown navigation

✓ Pros:

  • Vibrant 1.43” AMOLED screen with sapphire crystal durability
  • Excellent battery life (up to 40 hours in max accuracy GPS mode)
  • Free global offline maps with intuitive digital crown zooming
  • Dual-band GNSS provides highly accurate tracking in difficult terrain
  • Military-grade (MIL-STD-810H) durability

✗ Cons:

  • No NFC payments or music storage (music controls only)
  • No built-in speaker or microphone for calls
  • 49mm case size is bulky for smaller wrists
  • Steel version is noticeably heavier (83g) than the Titanium model (69g)

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Check Price on Amazon

Which one is better?

The Amazfit Falcon is the better buy for most people - its 20 ATM water resistance crushes the Suunto Race's 10 ATM. That said, grab the Suunto Race if you need more battery life for long outings - it offers 40 hours in max GPS mode compared to the Falcon's 21 hours.

Who should buy each?

Choose the Amazfit Falcon if: you want the ultimate in water resistance for swimming, need robust offline music storage for workouts, or prefer a lighter watch at 2.26oz.
Choose the Suunto Race if: you prioritize battery longevity for long adventures, appreciate a larger display at 1.43in, or want free global offline maps for navigation.

Conclusion

With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.

Frequently Asked Questions

+Which has better value?

Amazfit Falcon excels if you value elite build quality: titanium unibody with sapphire crystal. Suunto Race is better if you prioritize vibrant 1.43” amoled screen with sapphire crystal durability. Pick based on your budget and daily use.

+Is this an independent review?

Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.

+Do newer models exist?

Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.

Affiliate disclosure

PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.