AMD Ryzen 5 7600 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K
Get the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 unless you demand top-tier productivity. The core count difference is striking: 6 vs 20 cores means the Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K excels in intense multitasking. In real-world use, this translates to better performance for heavy applications, with the 20 cores handling tasks that would slow down the 6 cores of the Ryzen 5 7600. Its 65W TDP keeps it cool and efficient, making it a strong fit for gamers who don’t need the extra horsepower in productivity tasks. If you’re on a budget but still want good performance, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is definitely worth considering in 2026. Key specs: Cores/Threads: 6C/12T vs 20C/20T and Max Turbo Power: 88W vs 250W.
Why compare these? The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 (mid-range) and Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K (high-end) represent different approaches to processors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | AMD Ryzen | Intel Core |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | ✓4.8★ (2,968 reviews) | 4.7★ (1,014 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Excellent price-to-performance ratio for gaming | High energy efficiency in multi-threaded productivity tasks |
| Main Drawback | 6 cores may limit performance in heavy multi-threaded productivity | Gaming performance often trails previous Gen (14700K) and AMD X3D |
| Market Position | Mid-range | ✓Premium |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
Zen 4 (Ryzen 7000 Series)
Socket AM5 (LGA 1718)
6 Cores / 12 Threads
3.8 GHz Base / Up to 5.1 GHz Boost
Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K
Arrow Lake-S (Intel Core Ultra Series 2)
FCLGA1851 (LGA1851)
20 cores (8 P-cores + 12 E-cores) / 20 threads (No Hyper-Threading)
P-core 3.9 GHz base / 5.5 GHz boost; E-core 3.3 GHz base / 4.6 GHz boost
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: AMD Ryzen 5 7600 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K
| Criterion | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 | Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.8(2,968)Amazon | ★4.7(1,014)Amazon |
Architecture Gen | Zen 4 (Ryzen 7000 Series) | Arrow Lake-S (Intel Core Ultra Series 2) |
Socket Platform | Socket AM5 (LGA 1718) | FCLGA1851 (LGA1851) |
Cores Threads | 6 Cores / 12 Threads | 20 cores (8 P-cores + 12 E-cores) / 20 threads (No Hyper-Threading) |
Base Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz Base / Up to 5.1 GHz Boost | P-core 3.9 GHz base / 5.5 GHz boost; E-core 3.3 GHz base / 4.6 GHz boost |
Cache L2 L3 | 6 MB L2 + 32 MB L3 (38 MB Total) | 36 MB L2 + 30 MB Intel Smart Cache (66 MB Total) |
TDP Power | 65 W | 125W Processor Base Power |
Max Turbo Power | 88 W (PPT) | 250W Maximum Turbo Power (PL2) |
Process Node | TSMC 5nm FinFET (Core Complex) / 6nm (I/O Die) | TSMC N3B (Compute Tile) + TSMC N6 (SoC Tile) |
Memory Support | DDR5-5200 MT/s (Official); Dual-Channel; Up to 192 GB; ECC Support | Up to 192GB DDR5; Native DDR5-6400 (CUDIMM supported); ECC supported (W880 chipset only) |
Memory Bandwidth Max | N/A (Dependent on RAM config, theoretical max ~83.2 GB/s @ 5200 MT/s) | Up to 102.4 GB/s |
Pcie Version | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 and 4.0 |
Pcie Lanes | 28 Total (24 Usable for Graphics/Storage) | 24 usable (20x PCIe 5.0 + 4x PCIe 4.0) |
Igpu | AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores, 2200 MHz) | Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores, up to 2.0 GHz) |
Instruction Features | AMD-V, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, FMA3, AES-NI, SHA, SSE4.1/4.2 | Intel 64; AVX2; VNNI; Intel DL Boost; NPU 3 (13 TOPS) |
Cooler Included | Yes (Wraith Stealth) | No (thermal solution not included) |
Max Temp | 95°C (203°F) TjMax | 105°C (Tjmax) |
Notes Limits | Efficient 65W design with unlocked multiplier for overclocking (PBO supported). Low power draw (88W PPT max) makes it easy to cool. Integrated graphics intended for display/office use only. | First enthusiast Intel CPU without Hyper-Threading; requires LGA1851 motherboard (800 Series); 13 TOPS NPU for local AI acceleration |
Chipset Support | A620, B650, B650E, X670, X670E, B840, B850, X870, X870E | Intel Z890, B860, H810, W880 |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
Zen 4 (Ryzen 7000 Series)
Socket AM5 (LGA 1718)
6 Cores / 12 Threads
3.8 GHz Base / Up to 5.1 GHz Boost
6 MB L2 + 32 MB L3 (38 MB Total)
65 W
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio for gaming
- Highly efficient 65W TDP; runs cool and includes a stock cooler
Cons
- 6 cores may limit performance in heavy multi-threaded productivity
- Included Wraith Stealth cooler is adequate but can get noisy under load
Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K
Arrow Lake-S (Intel Core Ultra Series 2)
FCLGA1851 (LGA1851)
20 cores (8 P-cores + 12 E-cores) / 20 threads (No Hyper-Threading)
P-core 3.9 GHz base / 5.5 GHz boost; E-core 3.3 GHz base / 4.6 GHz boost
36 MB L2 + 30 MB Intel Smart Cache (66 MB Total)
125W Processor Base Power
Pros
- High energy efficiency in multi-threaded productivity tasks
- Native support for fast DDR5-6400 memory and PCIe 5.0
Cons
- Gaming performance often trails previous Gen (14700K) and AMD X3D
- Requires new LGA1851 motherboard (no backward compatibility)
Which one is better?
The Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K is the better buy for most people - its 20 cores crush the AMD Ryzen 5 7600's 6 cores in multitasking scenarios.
Who should buy each?
Choose the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 if: you want a strong gaming CPU, prefer a cooler system with a 65W TDP, or are looking for a budget-friendly option.
Choose the Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K if: you need top-tier multi-threaded performance, work with demanding applications, or want the latest tech with DDR5-6400 memory support.
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.8★ vs 4.7★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose AMD Ryzen
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 2,968 reviews vs 1,014
→ Choose AMD Ryzen
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose Intel Core
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose AMD Ryzen
Conclusion
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K are both solid choices. Match the strengths above to your budget and workflow to make the best call.
Bottom line: The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 edges ahead with a 4.8★ rating compared to 4.7★. However, Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K remains a strong contender if its strengths align better with your needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: AMD Ryzen 5 7600 or Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K?
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is the better choice if you prioritize excellent price-to-performance ratio for gaming. Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K wins if you value high energy efficiency in multi-threaded productivity tasks. Both are rated highly (4.8★ vs 4.7★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K?
Key differences: AMD Ryzen 5 7600 offers excellent price-to-performance ratio for gaming, while Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K stands out with high energy efficiency in multi-threaded productivity tasks. Consider that AMD Ryzen 5 7600 6 cores may limit performance in heavy multi-threaded productivity. Meanwhile, Intel Core Ultra 7 Processor 265K gaming performance often trails previous gen (14700k) and amd x3d. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: February 7, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.