AMD Ryzen 5 7600 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K
If you want the ultimate performance, the Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K, with its 24 cores and 76MB cache, is tough to beat. In real-world use, the Ryzen 5 7600's 6 cores may limit performance in heavy multi-threaded tasks, while the Ultra 9 shines with high clock speeds (up to 5.7GHz) and lower temperatures during gaming. The AMD chip is great for budget-conscious gamers who want to maximize performance without breaking the bank in 2026, but the Intel processor delivers serious power for demanding applications, making the choice clear depending on your needs.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K
Comparison: AMD Ryzen 5 7600 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K
| Criterion | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 | Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.8(2,968)Amazon | ★4.6(512)Amazon |
Architecture Gen | Zen 4 (Ryzen 7000 Series) | Core Ultra 200S Series (Arrow Lake-S) |
Socket Platform | Socket AM5 (LGA 1718) | Socket LGA1851 |
Cores Threads | 6 Cores / 12 Threads | 24 Cores (8P + 16E) / 24 Threads |
Base Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz Base / Up to 5.1 GHz Boost | P-Core: 3.7 / 5.5 GHz; E-Core: 3.2 / 4.6 GHz; Max Turbo: 5.7 GHz (TVB) |
Cache L2 L3 | 6 MB L2 + 32 MB L3 (38 MB Total) | 40 MB L2 + 36 MB L3 (76 MB Total) |
TDP Power | 65 W | 125 W (Processor Base Power) |
Max Turbo Power | 88 W (PPT) | 250 W (Maximum Turbo Power) |
Process Node | TSMC 5nm FinFET (Core Complex) / 6nm (I/O Die) | TSMC N3B (Compute Tile) / TSMC N6 (SoC/IO Tiles) |
Memory Support | DDR5-5200 MT/s (Official); Dual-Channel; Up to 192 GB; ECC Support | DDR5-6400 MT/s (Official); Dual-Channel; Up to 192 GB; ECC Support: Yes (W880 chipset required) |
Memory Bandwidth Max | N/A (Dependent on RAM config, theoretical max ~83.2 GB/s @ 5200 MT/s) | N/A (Dependent on RAM config, theoretical max ~102.4 GB/s @ 6400 MT/s) |
Pcie Version | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 (x20 lanes) + PCIe 4.0 (x4 lanes) |
Pcie Lanes | 28 Total (24 Usable for Graphics/Storage) | 24 Total (20 Gen5 + 4 Gen4 Direct to CPU) |
Igpu | AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores, 2200 MHz) | Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores, 300 – 2000 MHz, Xe-LPG Architecture) |
Instruction Features | AMD-V, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, FMA3, AES-NI, SHA, SSE4.1/4.2 | Intel 64, AVX2, VNNI, AES-NI, VT-x, VT-d, SSE4.2; NPU: Intel AI Boost (13 TOPS) |
Cooler Included | Yes (Wraith Stealth) | No (360mm+ Liquid Cooler highly recommended) |
Max Temp | 95°C (203°F) TjMax | 105°C (221°F) TjMax |
Notes Limits | Efficient 65W design with unlocked multiplier for overclocking (PBO supported). Low power draw (88W PPT max) makes it easy to cool. Integrated graphics intended for display/office use only. | First flagship Intel desktop CPU to drop Hyper-Threading (24 threads total vs 32 on 14900K). Higher thermal limit (105°C) by design. Requires LGA1851 motherboard (Z890). |
Chipset Support | A620, B650, B650E, X670, X670E, B840, B850, X870, X870E | Intel 800 Series (Z890, B860, H810, W880) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
✓ Pros:
- • Excellent price-to-performance ratio for gaming
- • Highly efficient 65W TDP; runs cool and includes a stock cooler
- • Affordable entry point to the future-proof AM5 platform
✗ Cons:
- • 6 cores may limit performance in heavy multi-threaded productivity
- • Included Wraith Stealth cooler is adequate but can get noisy under load
- • Integrated graphics performance is very basic
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K
✓ Pros:
- • Significantly improved power efficiency compared to 14th Gen
- • Lower operating temperatures in gaming workloads
- • Modern platform connectivity: Integrated Thunderbolt 4, WiFi 7, and more PCIe 5.0 lanes
✗ Cons:
- • Removal of Hyper-Threading reduces performance in some specific multi-threaded apps
- • Requires new LGA1851 motherboard (no backward compatibility)
- • Gaming performance is often similar to or slightly behind the i9-14900K
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K is the better buy for most people - its 24 cores and 76MB cache crush the AMD Ryzen 5 7600.
Who should buy each?
Choose the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 if: you want excellent gaming performance at a budget, need a cooler-running CPU (65W TDP), or are building a cost-effective system.
Choose the Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K if: you require top-tier performance for multi-threaded tasks, want the latest tech for future-proofing, or need lower temperatures during heavy workloads.
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 excels if you value excellent price-to-performance ratio for gaming. Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K is better if you prioritize significantly improved power efficiency compared to 14th gen. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.