AMD Ryzen 9 9950X vs Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245K
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is the flagship option here, offering a staggering 16 cores and 32 threads. In contrast, the Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245K packs 14 cores with a mix of performance and efficient cores. If you're into heavy multitasking or content creation, the 9950X's impressive 80MB cache and higher clock speeds make it a powerhouse for demanding tasks. In real-world use, the Ryzen 9 9950X's boost clock can hit up to 5.7 GHz, allowing for superior performance in multi-core applications like video editing. Meanwhile, the Core Ultra 5’s power efficiency shines with a TDP of just 125W, making it a solid pick for those who prioritize energy savings and modern connectivity features like Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 5.0 support. Bottom line: for pure performance, the 9950X crushes the competition, but the Intel chip offers excellent efficiency for everyday tasks in 2026.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245K
Comparison: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X vs Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245K
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245K
| Criterion | AMD Ryzen 9 9950X | Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245K |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.7(892)Amazon | ★4.5(111)Amazon |
Architecture Gen | Zen 5 (Ryzen 9000 Series) | Arrow Lake-S (Core Ultra Series 2) |
Socket Platform | Socket AM5 (LGA 1718) | LGA1851 |
Cores Threads | 16 Cores / 32 Threads | 14 Cores (6 Performance + 8 Efficient) / 14 Threads |
Base Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz Base / Up to 5.7 GHz Boost | P-core: 4.2–5.2 GHz / E-core: 3.6–4.6 GHz |
Cache L2 L3 | 16 MB L2 + 64 MB L3 (80 MB Total) | 24 MB Intel® Smart Cache (L3) + 26 MB L2 (50 MB Total) |
TDP Power | 170 W | 125 W (Processor Base Power) |
Max Turbo Power | 230 W (PPT) | 159 W (Maximum Turbo Power) |
Process Node | TSMC 4nm FinFET (Core Complex) / 6nm (I/O Die) | TSMC N3B (Compute Tile) / TSMC N6 (SoC Tile) |
Memory Support | DDR5-5600 MT/s (Official); Dual-Channel; Up to 192 GB; ECC Support | DDR5-6400 MT/s (Official); CUDIMM Support; Up to 192 GB |
Memory Bandwidth Max | N/A (Dependent on RAM config, theoretical max ~89.6 GB/s @ 5600 MT/s) | 102.4 GB/s (at DDR5-6400) |
Pcie Version | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 and 4.0 |
Pcie Lanes | 28 Total (24 Usable for Graphics/Storage) | 24 (20 PCIe 5.0 + 4 PCIe 4.0 Direct from CPU) |
Igpu | AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores, 2200 MHz) | Intel® Graphics (4 Xe-cores, 1.9 GHz Max Dynamic) |
Instruction Features | AMD-V, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512 (Full 512-bit datapath), FMA3, AES-NI, SHA, SSE4.1/4.2 | SSE4.2, AVX2, VNNI, Intel 64, VT-x/d; NPU (13 TOPS AI) |
Cooler Included | No (Liquid cooler recommended) | No (Heatsink not included) |
Max Temp | 95°C (203°F) TjMax | 105°C (221°F) Max Operating Temperature |
Notes Limits | Flagship Zen 5 CPU designed to run at 95°C under load for maximum performance boost. Features full 512-bit AVX-512 support for AI/HPC workloads. Requires robust cooling (360mm AIO recommended). | Requires LGA1851 motherboard (800 Series). No Hyper-Threading. Includes dedicated NPU for AI workloads. |
Chipset Support | A620, B650, B650E, X670, X670E, B840, B850, X870, X870E | Intel 800 Series (Z890, B860, H810, etc.) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
✓ Pros:
- • Class-leading multi-core productivity performance
- • Improved AVX-512 performance (full 512-bit path) for AI/workstation tasks
- • Stronger single-core performance and efficiency vs. 7950X
✗ Cons:
- • High thermal output (designed to push to 95°C)
- • Expensive; value proposition lower for pure gaming vs. X3D models
- • No cooler included
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245K
✓ Pros:
- • Significantly improved power efficiency (performance-per-watt) vs. 14th Gen
- • Modern platform connectivity: Native Thunderbolt 4, WiFi 7, PCIe 5.0 lanes
- • Integrated NPU (13 TOPS) accelerates light local AI workloads
- • Run cooler than previous i5-K SKUs under load
✗ Cons:
- • Gaming performance often flat or slightly lower than 14600K/Ryzen 9000
- • Removal of Hyper-Threading reduces multi-core potential in some apps
- • Requires new LGA1851 socket (incompatible with LGA1700)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is the better buy for most people - its 16 cores and 32 threads crush the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K's performance. That said, grab the Intel if you want to save on power consumption with its 125W TDP, which is significantly lower than the AMD's 170W.
Who should buy each?
Choose the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X if: you need maximum multi-core performance for video editing, plan on running heavy workloads, or want a processor that excels in AI tasks.
Choose the Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245K if: you want better power efficiency, need modern connectivity options like Thunderbolt 4, or are focused on general productivity without pushing the limits.
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X excels if you value class-leading multi-core productivity performance. Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 245K is better if you prioritize significantly improved power efficiency (performance-per-watt) vs. 14th gen. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.