AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor vs BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor
The AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor is the budget option here, but its 165Hz refresh rate is impressive for fast-paced gaming. In real-world use, it offers smooth gameplay, although you might notice some ghosting in darker scenes. Meanwhile, the BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor takes the lead with its jaw-dropping 360Hz refresh rate, delivering ultra-clear motion clarity that can be a game-changer in competitive play. Key specs: Display: 23.6" vs 24.5" and Refresh: 165 Hz vs 360 Hz.
Why compare these? The AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor (budget-friendly) and BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor (premium flagship) represent different approaches to monitors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | AOC C24G1A | BenQ ZOWIE |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | ✓4.7★ (10,226 reviews) | 4.5★ (254 reviews) |
| Top Strength | 165Hz refresh rate (over DisplayPort) delivers smooth motion for competitive gaming | 360Hz refresh rate on a Fast TN panel delivers the clearest motion clarity available for esports |
| Main Drawback | No USB ports (User draft lists 4x USB, but verified retail units LACK a USB hub) | TN panel viewing angles and color reproduction are inferior to IPS/OLED alternatives |
| Market Position | Budget | ✓Flagship |
AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor
23.6" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor
24.5" Viewable (25" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
TN (Fast TN)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor vs BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor
AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor
BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor
| Criterion | AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor | BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.7(10,226)Amazon | ★4.5(254)Amazon |
Screen Size | 23.6" Viewable (24" Class) | 24.5" Viewable (25" Class) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | VA (Vertical Alignment) | TN (Fast TN) |
Refresh Rate | 165 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 144 Hz (via HDMI) | 360 Hz |
Response Time | 1 ms (MPRT) / 4 ms (GtG) | 0.5 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 250 nits (Typical) | 320 nits (Typical) |
Contrast | 3,000:1 (Static) / 80,000,000:1 (Dynamic) | 1,000:1 (Typical) |
Color Gamut | 119% sRGB / 88% DCI-P3 (CIE1976) | Not specified (Standard sRGB coverage) |
Color Depth | 16.7M (8-bit) | 8-bit |
HDR | No (Not supported) | No (Not supported) |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync Premium (48-165Hz range via DP) | Variable Refresh Rate (DyAc+ must be OFF) |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 170° (H) / 160° (V) |
Curvature | 1500R | Flat |
Speakers | No (None) | No (None) |
Ports | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x VGA; 1x 3.5mm Audio Out | 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out; 1x Mini-USB (for S-Switch only) |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
Ergonomics | Height (130mm), Swivel (-30° to 30°), Tilt (-5° to 23°); No Pivot | Height (155mm), Tilt (-5° to 23°), Swivel (-45° to 45°), Pivot (90°) |
Power Consumption | 31 W (Typical) / 0.5 W (Standby) | 40 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) |
Weight With Stand | 4,510 g (9.94 lbs) | 6,200 g (13.67 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor
23.6" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
165 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 144 Hz (via HDMI)
1 ms (MPRT) / 4 ms (GtG)
Pros
- 165Hz refresh rate (over DisplayPort) delivers smooth motion for competitive gaming
- High 3,000:1 contrast ratio provides deep blacks superior to IPS panels
Cons
- No USB ports (User draft lists 4x USB, but verified retail units LACK a USB hub)
- Ghosting / black smearing is noticeable in dark transitions (typical of budget VA panels)
BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor
24.5" Viewable (25" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
TN (Fast TN)
360 Hz
0.5 ms (GtG)
Pros
- 360Hz refresh rate on a Fast TN panel delivers the clearest motion clarity available for esports
- DyAc+ technology drastically reduces motion blur (strobing), giving a competitive edge in shooters like CS2/Valorant
Cons
- TN panel viewing angles and color reproduction are inferior to IPS/OLED alternatives
- DyAc+ cannot be used simultaneously with Variable Refresh Rate (FreeSync/G-Sync)
Which one is better?
The BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 360Hz refresh rate crushes the AOC’s 165Hz.
Who should buy each?
Choose the AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor if: you want a budget-friendly option for smooth gameplay, you prioritize deep blacks for immersive gaming, or you need a monitor that fits comfortably in smaller spaces. (23.6" display, 165 Hz refresh)
Choose the BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor if: you play fast-paced competitive games like CS2 or Valorant, you need the clearest motion clarity, or you want advanced features like DyAc+ for reduced motion blur.
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.7★ vs 4.5★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose AOC C24G1A
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 10,226 reviews vs 254
→ Choose AOC C24G1A
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose BenQ ZOWIE
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose AOC C24G1A
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Bottom line: The AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor edges ahead with a 4.7★ rating compared to 4.5★. However, BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor remains a strong contender if its strengths align better with your needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor or BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor?
AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize 165hz refresh rate (over displayport) delivers smooth motion for competitive gaming. BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor wins if you value 360hz refresh rate on a fast tn panel delivers the clearest motion clarity available for esports. Both are rated highly (4.7★ vs 4.5★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor and BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor?
Key differences: AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor offers 165hz refresh rate (over displayport) delivers smooth motion for competitive gaming, while BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor stands out with 360hz refresh rate on a fast tn panel delivers the clearest motion clarity available for esports. Consider that AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor no usb ports (user draft lists 4x usb, but verified retail units lack a usb hub). Meanwhile, BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor tn panel viewing angles and color reproduction are inferior to ips/oled alternatives. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.