AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor vs KOORUI 24E3 165Hz Gaming Monitor
Choosing between AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor and KOORUI 24E3 165Hz Gaming Monitor can be tricky. Both are excellent, but they serve different priorities. This guide highlights what matters for US shoppers.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor
KOORUI 24E3 165Hz Gaming Monitor
Comparison: AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor vs KOORUI 24E3 165Hz Gaming Monitor
AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor
KOORUI 24E3 165Hz Gaming Monitor
| Criterion | AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor | KOORUI 24E3 165Hz Gaming Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.7(10,226)Amazon | ★4.3(3,500)Amazon |
Screen Size | 23.6" Viewable (24" Class) | 23.8" Viewable (24" Class) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | VA (Vertical Alignment) | IPS (Fast IPS) |
Refresh Rate | 165 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 144 Hz (via HDMI) | 165 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 144 Hz (via HDMI) |
Response Time | 1 ms (MPRT) / 4 ms (GtG) | 1 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 250 nits (Typical) | 250 nits (Typical) |
Contrast | 3,000:1 (Static) / 80,000,000:1 (Dynamic) | 1,000:1 (Static) / 20,000,000:1 (Dynamic) |
Color Gamut | 119% sRGB / 88% DCI-P3 (CIE1976) | 99% sRGB / 72% NTSC |
Color Depth | 16.7M (8-bit) | 16.7M (8-bit) |
HDR | No (Not supported) | No (Not supported) |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync Premium (48-165Hz range via DP) | AMD FreeSync (G-Sync Compatible) |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | 1500R | Flat |
Speakers | No (None) | No (None) |
Ports | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x VGA; 1x 3.5mm Audio Out | 2x HDMI 1.4; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x 3.5mm Audio Out |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 75 x 75 mm |
Ergonomics | Height (130mm), Swivel (-30° to 30°), Tilt (-5° to 23°); No Pivot | Tilt only (-5° to 20°) |
Power Consumption | 31 W (Typical) / 0.5 W (Standby) | 30 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) |
Weight With Stand | 4,510 g (9.94 lbs) | 3,060 g (6.75 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • 165Hz refresh rate (over DisplayPort) delivers smooth motion for competitive gaming
- • High 3,000:1 contrast ratio provides deep blacks superior to IPS panels
- • Excellent color coverage (>119% sRGB) makes games look vibrant and saturated
- • Includes a fully ergonomic stand with height and swivel adjustments (rare at this price)
- • Legacy VGA port included for connecting older PCs or secondary devices
✗ Cons:
- • No USB ports (User draft lists 4x USB, but verified retail units LACK a USB hub)
- • Ghosting / black smearing is noticeable in dark transitions (typical of budget VA panels)
- • 165Hz requires DisplayPort; HDMI is typically capped at 144Hz
- • Lacks built-in speakers
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
KOORUI 24E3 165Hz Gaming Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • True Fast IPS panel delivers 1ms response times with vibrant 99% sRGB colors
- • High 165Hz refresh rate (via DisplayPort) for competitive esports gaming
- • Supports AMD FreeSync Premium to eliminate screen tearing
- • Includes both DisplayPort and two HDMI ports for connecting multiple devices
- • VESA 75x75mm mountable, allowing for aftermarket arm upgrades
✗ Cons:
- • Stand ergonomics are poor (Tilt only; no height adjustment)
- • HDMI ports are limited to 144Hz (must use DisplayPort for full 165Hz)
- • No built-in speakers
- • Controls are basic and the OSD menu can be clunky to navigate
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor is stronger in quality and performance, but KOORUI 24E3 165Hz Gaming Monitor could still be the better pick if you value its unique advantages.
Who should buy each?
AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor excels at: 165Hz refresh rate (over DisplayPort) delivers smooth motion for competitive gaming, High 3,000:1 contrast ratio provides deep blacks superior to IPS panels
Watch for: No USB ports (User draft lists 4x USB, but verified retail units LACK a USB hub)
KOORUI 24E3 165Hz Gaming Monitor excels at: True Fast IPS panel delivers 1ms response times with vibrant 99% sRGB colors, High 165Hz refresh rate (via DisplayPort) for competitive esports gaming
Watch for: Stand ergonomics are poor (Tilt only; no height adjustment)
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor excels if you value 165hz refresh rate (over displayport) delivers smooth motion for competitive gaming. KOORUI 24E3 165Hz Gaming Monitor is better if you prioritize true fast ips panel delivers 1ms response times with vibrant 99% srgb colors. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.