AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor vs LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
If you're debating between the AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor and the LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor, the LG comes out on top. With a stunning 3440 x 1440 resolution, it offers 33% more screen space than the AOC's 1920 x 1080 display. In real-world use, the ultrawide aspect ratio is a game changer for multitasking and immersive gaming, providing a wider field of view that enhances your experience significantly. However, the AOC C24G1A is a budget-friendly option that excels with its high 165Hz refresh rate, making it perfect for competitive gaming where smooth motion is vital. The AOC's 3,000:1 contrast ratio makes colors pop, but you’ll miss out on that gorgeous ultrawide experience unless you opt for the LG, which is alsoheavier and supports HDR10 for richer visuals. So, the choice largely hinges on whether you prefer a vibrant, expansive display or a more budget-centric gaming monitor. Key specs: Display: 23.6" vs 34" and Refresh: 165 Hz vs 160 Hz.
Why compare these? The AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor (budget-friendly) and LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor (mid-range) represent different approaches to monitors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | AOC C24G1A | LG 34WP60C-B |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | ✓4.7★ (10,226 reviews) | 4.6★ (1,104 reviews) |
| Top Strength | 165Hz refresh rate (over DisplayPort) delivers smooth motion for competitive gaming | Expansive 21:9 WQHD resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9 |
| Main Drawback | No USB ports (User draft lists 4x USB, but verified retail units LACK a USB hub) | Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments |
| Market Position | Budget | ✓Mid-range |
AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor
23.6" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
34" Viewable (34" Class)
3440 x 1440 (WQHD)
21:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor vs LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
| Criterion | AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor | LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.7(10,226)Amazon | ★4.6(1,104)Amazon |
Screen Size | 23.6" Viewable (24" Class) | 34" Viewable (34" Class) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 3440 x 1440 (WQHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 21:9 |
Screen Type | VA (Vertical Alignment) | VA (Vertical Alignment) |
Refresh Rate | 165 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 144 Hz (via HDMI) | 160 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 100 Hz (via HDMI) |
Response Time | 1 ms (MPRT) / 4 ms (GtG) | 5 ms (GtG Faster) / 1 ms (MBR) |
Brightness | 250 nits (Typical) | 300 nits (Typical) / 240 nits (Min) |
Contrast | 3,000:1 (Static) / 80,000,000:1 (Dynamic) | 3,000:1 (Typical) |
Color Gamut | 119% sRGB / 88% DCI-P3 (CIE1976) | 99% sRGB (CIE1931) |
Color Depth | 16.7M (8-bit) | 1.07 Billion (10-bit) |
HDR | No (Not supported) | HDR10 |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync Premium (48-165Hz range via DP) | AMD FreeSync Premium |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | 1500R | 1800R |
Speakers | No (None) | No (None) |
Ports | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x VGA; 1x 3.5mm Audio Out | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
Ergonomics | Height (130mm), Swivel (-30° to 30°), Tilt (-5° to 23°); No Pivot | Tilt only (-5° to 15°) |
Power Consumption | 31 W (Typical) / 0.5 W (Standby) | 42 W (Typical) / 45 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Sleep) |
Weight With Stand | 4,510 g (9.94 lbs) | 6,800 g (14.99 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor
23.6" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
165 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 144 Hz (via HDMI)
1 ms (MPRT) / 4 ms (GtG)
Pros
- 165Hz refresh rate (over DisplayPort) delivers smooth motion for competitive gaming
- High 3,000:1 contrast ratio provides deep blacks superior to IPS panels
Cons
- No USB ports (User draft lists 4x USB, but verified retail units LACK a USB hub)
- Ghosting / black smearing is noticeable in dark transitions (typical of budget VA panels)
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
34" Viewable (34" Class)
3440 x 1440 (WQHD)
21:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
160 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 100 Hz (via HDMI)
5 ms (GtG Faster) / 1 ms (MBR)
Pros
- Expansive 21:9 WQHD resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9
- High 160Hz refresh rate (via DisplayPort) delivers fluid motion for gaming
Cons
- Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments
- HDMI ports are version 2.0, limiting refresh rate to 100Hz at native resolution
Which one is better?
The LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor is the better buy for most people - its expansive 3440 x 1440 resolution crushes the AOC's 1920 x 1080. That said, grab the AOC C24G1A if you want a smooth 165Hz experience while saving some cash - it's a no-brainer for competitive gamers.
Who should buy each?
Choose the AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor if: you need a high refresh rate for competitive gaming, prefer a smaller screen for space-saving, or want to save money. (23.6" display, 165 Hz refresh)
Choose the LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor if: you want an immersive gaming experience with ultrawide view, need more screen space for multitasking, or enjoy watching HDR content for enhanced visuals. (34" display, 160 Hz refresh)
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.7★ vs 4.6★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose AOC C24G1A
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 10,226 reviews vs 1,104
→ Choose AOC C24G1A
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose LG 34WP60C-B
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose AOC C24G1A
Conclusion
AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor and LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor are both solid choices. Match the strengths above to your budget and workflow to make the best call.
Bottom line: The AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor edges ahead with a 4.7★ rating compared to 4.6★. However, LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor remains a strong contender if its strengths align better with your needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor or LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor?
AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize 165hz refresh rate (over displayport) delivers smooth motion for competitive gaming. LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor wins if you value expansive 21:9 wqhd resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9. Both are rated highly (4.7★ vs 4.6★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor and LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor?
Key differences: AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor offers 165hz refresh rate (over displayport) delivers smooth motion for competitive gaming, while LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor stands out with expansive 21:9 wqhd resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9. Consider that AOC C24G1A 23.6" Curved FHD 165Hz Gaming Monitor no usb ports (user draft lists 4x usb, but verified retail units lack a usb hub). Meanwhile, LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.