BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor vs Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor
Looking for a monitor that fits your needs? The BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor is the budget option, while the Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor offers features that are worth considering for gamers and content creators alike. The key difference is in the resolution: 1920 x 1080 for the BenQ vs 3840 x 2160 for the Acer. This means sharper images and better detail on the Acer, which is crucial if you're into gaming or photography. Plus, the Acer's 600 nits brightness makes it much more vibrant, especially in well-lit rooms. Key specs: Display: 23.8" vs 27" and Refresh: 60 Hz vs 320 Hz.
Why compare these? The BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor (budget-friendly) and Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor (entry-level) represent different approaches to monitors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | BenQ GW2480 | Acer Nitro |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | ✓4.6★ (19,967 reviews) | 3.6★ (36 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Exclusive 'Brightness Intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light | Innovative Dual Mode: Switch between high-res 4K 160Hz or ultra-fast 1080p 320Hz |
| Main Drawback | Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not suitable for gaming) | OSD menu navigation can be clunky compared to competitors |
| Market Position | Budget | ✓Entry |
BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
27" (68.6 cm)
3840 x 2160 (4K UHD)
16:9
IPS (Mini-LED backlight)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor vs Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor
BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor
| Criterion | BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor | Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(19,967)Amazon | ★3.6(36)Amazon |
Screen Size | 23.8" Viewable (24" Class) | 27" (68.6 cm) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 3840 x 2160 (4K UHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | IPS (In-Plane Switching) | IPS (Mini-LED backlight) |
Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 160 Hz (4K); 320 Hz (1080p via DFR Dual Mode) |
Response Time | 5 ms (GtG) | 1 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 250 nits (Typical) | 600 cd/m² (Typical); 1000 cd/m² (HDR Peak) |
Contrast | 1,000:1 (Native) / 20,000,000:1 (Dynamic) | 1,000:1 (Native); 100,000,000:1 (ACM Dynamic) |
Color Gamut | 72% NTSC (Approx. 100% sRGB) | 99% AdobeRGB; 95% DCI-P3 |
Color Depth | 16.7M (8-bit) | 10-bit (8-bit + FRC) |
HDR | No (Not supported) | VESA DisplayHDR 1000 (HDR10) |
Adaptive Sync | No (Not supported) | AMD FreeSync Premium |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | No (Flat panel) |
Speakers | 2x 1 W (Stereo) | Yes (2x 3W) |
Ports | 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x VGA; 1x 3.5mm Audio In; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out | 2x HDMI 2.1; 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x USB-C (DP Alt Mode, 90W PD); 2x USB-A 3.0 (Downstream); 1x USB-B (Upstream); 1x 3.5mm Audio Out |
USB C | No | Yes (DP Alt Mode, Data, 90W Power Delivery) |
Kvm | No | Yes (Built-in KVM switch) |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 75 x 75 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 20°) | Tilt (-5° to 25°); Swivel (±25°); Height adj. (150 mm); Pivot (±90°) |
Power Consumption | 16 W (Energy Star) / 27 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) | 35 W (Standard); 230 W (Max with USB-C charging) |
Weight With Stand | 3,840 g (8.47 lbs) | 6,720 g (14.82 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
60 Hz
5 ms (GtG)
Pros
- Exclusive 'Brightness Intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light
- Flicker-Free and Low Blue Light technologies are certified by TÜV Rheinland
Cons
- Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not suitable for gaming)
- Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments
Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor
27" (68.6 cm)
3840 x 2160 (4K UHD)
16:9
IPS (Mini-LED backlight)
160 Hz (4K); 320 Hz (1080p via DFR Dual Mode)
1 ms (GtG)
Pros
- Innovative Dual Mode: Switch between high-res 4K 160Hz or ultra-fast 1080p 320Hz
- Mini-LED backlight with 576 local dimming zones delivers deep blacks and high brightness
Cons
- OSD menu navigation can be clunky compared to competitors
- Local dimming (576 zones) may show slight blooming compared to higher-tier 1000+ zone panels
Which one is better?
The Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 3840 x 2160 resolution crushes the BenQ's 1920 x 1080. That said, grab the BenQ if you want a lightweight and budget-friendly option - it's lighter for easy setup.
Who should buy each?
Choose the BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor if: you need a budget option, prefer lower weight at 135.45 oz, or want eye-care features like low blue light.
Choose the Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor if: you want a stunning 4K display at 3840 x 2160, need a high refresh rate for gaming at 160Hz, or value vibrant colors with 600 nits brightness.
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.6★ vs 3.6★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose BenQ GW2480
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 19,967 reviews vs 36
→ Choose BenQ GW2480
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose Acer Nitro
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose BenQ GW2480
Conclusion
There is no wrong answer here. Focus on the features you will use daily and pick the model that aligns with them.
Bottom line: The BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor edges ahead with a 4.6★ rating compared to 3.6★. However, Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor remains a strong contender if its strengths align better with your needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor or Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor?
BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize exclusive 'brightness intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light. Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor wins if you value innovative dual mode: switch between high-res 4k 160hz or ultra-fast 1080p 320hz. Both are rated highly (4.6★ vs 3.6★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor and Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor?
Key differences: BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor offers exclusive 'brightness intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light, while Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor stands out with innovative dual mode: switch between high-res 4k 160hz or ultra-fast 1080p 320hz. Consider that BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor limited to 60hz refresh rate (not suitable for gaming). Meanwhile, Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor osd menu navigation can be clunky compared to competitors. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.