BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor vs ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor
The BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor is the budget option here, offering an impressive display with a focus on eye comfort. However, the ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor steps things up with a better resolution and color accuracy, making it ideal for creative work. In real-world use, the larger screen size of 27 inches compared to 23.8 inches means more screen real estate for multitasking or editing photos and videos, which is a game changer for professionals. Key specs: Display: 23.8" vs 27" and Refresh: 60 Hz vs 75 Hz.
Why compare these? The BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor (budget-friendly) and ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor (entry-level) represent different approaches to monitors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | BenQ GW2480 | ASUS ProArt |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | ✓4.6★ (19,967 reviews) | 4.4★ (3,104 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Exclusive 'Brightness Intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light | Factory calibrated and Calman Verified for excellent color accuracy (Delta E < 2) out of the box |
| Main Drawback | Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not suitable for gaming) | Lacks USB-C connectivity for single-cable laptop docking (found on the pricier 'CV' model) |
| Market Position | Budget | ✓Entry |

BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)

ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor
27" Viewable (27" Class)
2560 x 1440 (WQHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor vs ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor

BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor

ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor
| Criterion | BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor | ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(19,967)Amazon | ★4.4(3,104)Amazon |
Screen Size | 23.8" Viewable (24" Class) | 27" Viewable (27" Class) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 2560 x 1440 (WQHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | IPS (In-Plane Switching) | IPS (In-Plane Switching) |
Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 75 Hz |
Response Time | 5 ms (GtG) | 5 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 250 nits (Typical) | 350 nits (Typical) |
Contrast | 1,000:1 (Native) / 20,000,000:1 (Dynamic) | 1,000:1 (Typical) |
Color Gamut | 72% NTSC (Approx. 100% sRGB) | 100% sRGB / 100% Rec. 709 |
Color Depth | 16.7M (8-bit) | 16.7M (8-bit) |
HDR | No (Not supported) | No (Not supported) |
Adaptive Sync | No (Not supported) | Adaptive-Sync (48Hz - 75Hz range) |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | Flat |
Speakers | 2x 1 W (Stereo) | 2x 2 W (Stereo) |
Ports | 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x VGA; 1x 3.5mm Audio In; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out | 1x Mini DisplayPort 1.2; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x Dual-Link DVI-D; 4x USB 3.0 Downstream; 1x USB-B Upstream; 1x 3.5mm Audio In; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 20°) | Height (150mm), Swivel (-90° to 90°), Pivot (90°), Tilt (-5° to 35°) |
Power Consumption | 16 W (Energy Star) / 27 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) | 18.6 W (Typical) / 0.5 W (Standby) |
Weight With Stand | 3,840 g (8.47 lbs) | 7,720 g (17.02 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
60 Hz
5 ms (GtG)
Pros
- Exclusive 'Brightness Intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light
- Flicker-Free and Low Blue Light technologies are certified by TÜV Rheinland
Cons
- Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not suitable for gaming)
- Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments

ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor
27" Viewable (27" Class)
2560 x 1440 (WQHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
75 Hz
5 ms (GtG)
Pros
- Factory calibrated and Calman Verified for excellent color accuracy (Delta E < 2) out of the box
- Rare inclusion of legacy ports (Mini DisplayPort and DVI-D) maximizes compatibility with older workstations
Cons
- Lacks USB-C connectivity for single-cable laptop docking (found on the pricier 'CV' model)
- No HDR support
Which one is better?
The ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 75Hz refresh rate crushes the BenQ's 60Hz, making it smoother for everyday tasks.
Who should buy each?
Choose the BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor if: you want a budget-friendly option, need a compact monitor for small spaces, or prioritize eye comfort with its brightness intelligence feature. (23.8" display, 60 Hz refresh)
Choose the ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor if: you work in photography or design, appreciate color accuracy with a Delta E < 2, or want a larger screen with a higher resolution for improved productivity.
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.4★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose BenQ GW2480
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 19,967 reviews vs 3,104
→ Choose BenQ GW2480
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose ASUS ProArt
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose BenQ GW2480
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Bottom line: The BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor edges ahead with a 4.6★ rating compared to 4.4★. However, ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor remains a strong contender if its strengths align better with your needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor or ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor?
BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize exclusive 'brightness intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light. ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor wins if you value factory calibrated and calman verified for excellent color accuracy (delta e < 2) out of the box. Both are rated highly (4.6★ vs 4.4★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor and ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor?
Key differences: BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor offers exclusive 'brightness intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light, while ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor stands out with factory calibrated and calman verified for excellent color accuracy (delta e < 2) out of the box. Consider that BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor limited to 60hz refresh rate (not suitable for gaming). Meanwhile, ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV 27" WQHD Monitor lacks usb-c connectivity for single-cable laptop docking (found on the pricier 'cv' model). Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
