BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor vs LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor
If you're looking for a monitor that truly delivers, the LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor is a standout. Its 240Hz refresh rate crushes the BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor's 60Hz, making it the better choice for gamers and action movie enthusiasts alike. In real-world use, the LG monitor's QHD resolution of 2560 x 1440 provides crisp visuals that are a significant upgrade over the BenQ's 1920 x 1080. The key difference here is the response time too—0.03ms on the LG vs 5ms on the BenQ, which means smoother gameplay and less ghosting when the action heats up. This makes a huge difference for fast-paced gaming and high-frame-rate content in 2026.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor

LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor vs LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor

BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor

LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor
| Criterion | BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor | LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(19,967)Amazon | ★4.5(849)Best Buy |
Screen Size | 23.8" Viewable (24" Class) | 26.5" Viewable (27" Class) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 2560 x 1440 (QHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | IPS (In-Plane Switching) | WOLED (White OLED) |
Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 240 Hz |
Response Time | 5 ms (GtG) | 0.03 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 250 nits (Typical) | 200 nits (SDR Typical) / 1,000 nits (HDR Peak at 3% APL) |
Contrast | 1,000:1 (Native) / 20,000,000:1 (Dynamic) | 1,500,000:1 (Typ.) |
Color Gamut | 72% NTSC (Approx. 100% sRGB) | 98.5% DCI-P3 (CIE1976) |
Color Depth | 16.7M (8-bit) | 1.07 Billion (10-bit) |
HDR | No (Not supported) | HDR10 |
Adaptive Sync | No (Not supported) | NVIDIA G-SYNC Compatible / AMD FreeSync Premium |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | Flat |
Speakers | 2x 1 W (Stereo) | No (None) |
Ports | 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x VGA; 1x 3.5mm Audio In; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out | 2x HDMI 2.1; 1x DisplayPort 1.4 (DSC); 1x USB 3.0 Upstream; 2x USB 3.0 Downstream; 1x 4-Pole Headphone Out (DTS Headphone:X); 1x Optical Audio Out (SPDIF) |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 20°) | Height (110mm), Swivel (-10° to 10°), Tilt (-5° to 15°), Pivot (90°) |
Power Consumption | 16 W (Energy Star) / 27 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) | 36.7 W (Typical) / 94 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Sleep) |
Weight With Stand | 3,840 g (8.47 lbs) | 7,350 g (16.2 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • Exclusive 'Brightness Intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light
- • Flicker-Free and Low Blue Light technologies are certified by TÜV Rheinland
- • Triple connectivity (HDMI, DisplayPort, VGA) supports both modern and legacy PCs
- • Built-in cable management system inside the stand keeps the desk tidy
- • IPS panel ensures consistent color accuracy and wide viewing angles
✗ Cons:
- • Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not suitable for gaming)
- • Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments
- • Built-in 1W speakers are very quiet and lack bass
- • No USB ports for peripherals
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • WOLED panel delivers perfect black levels and infinite contrast with no blooming
- • 240Hz refresh rate combined with 0.03ms response provides motion clarity matching 360Hz LCDs
- • Includes a physical remote control for easy OSD access (rare for monitors)
- • Matte anti-glare coating reduces reflections in lit rooms (unlike glossy QD-OLEDs)
- • Supports 4K @ 120Hz downscaling via HDMI 2.1 for PS5/Xbox Series X
✗ Cons:
- • SDR brightness is aggressive capped (~200 nits), looking dim in bright rooms
- • Matte coating can introduce a slight 'grain' or fuzziness to white backgrounds
- • RWBG subpixel layout causes text fringing (text looks less sharp than on LCDs)
- • Aggressive ABL (Auto Brightness Limiter) dims the screen when large white windows are open
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B is the better buy for most people - its 240Hz refresh rate crushes the BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor's 60Hz.
Who should buy each?
Choose the BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor if: you want an affordable monitor for everyday tasks, prefer eye-care technology for long hours of use, or need a simple display without high refresh rates. (23.8" display, 60 Hz refresh)
Choose the LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor if: you want the best gaming experience with 240Hz refresh, crave stunning visuals with QHD resolution, or play competitive games where response time matters.
Conclusion
BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor and LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor are both solid choices. Match the strengths above to your budget and workflow to make the best call.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor excels if you value exclusive 'brightness intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light. LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B 26.5" QHD OLED 240Hz Gaming Monitor is better if you prioritize woled panel delivers perfect black levels and infinite contrast with no blooming. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
