BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor vs SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor
The BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor is the budget option here, but it offers impressive eye-care features like a Brightness Intelligence sensor that auto-adjusts brightness based on ambient light. Meanwhile, the SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor packs a punch with a 165Hz refresh rate, making it a no-brainer for gamers who crave smooth gameplay. In real-world use, the BenQ shines for long hours of work or casual viewing, thanks to its flicker-free technology, while the Samsung's 1000R curvature enhances immersion for gaming sessions. The 32" screen size also means more screen real estate, delivering a sharper WQHD resolution of 2560 x 1440 compared to the BenQ's 1920 x 1080, making it ideal for multitasking and gaming alike. Key specs: Display: 23.8" vs 32" and Refresh: 60 Hz vs 165 Hz.
Why compare these? The BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor (budget-friendly) and SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor (mid-range) represent different approaches to monitors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | BenQ GW2480 | SAMSUNG Odyssey |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | ✓4.6★ (19,967 reviews) | 4.4★ (2,537 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Exclusive 'Brightness Intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light | Aggressive 1000R curvature matches the human eye's field of view for maximum immersion |
| Main Drawback | Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not suitable for gaming) | Stand is basic with Tilt-only adjustment (no height or swivel) |
| Market Position | Budget | ✓Mid-range |
BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor
32" Class (31.5" Viewable)
2560 x 1440 (WQHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor vs SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor
BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor
| Criterion | BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor | SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(19,967)Amazon | ★4.4(2,537)Amazon |
Screen Size | 23.8" Viewable (24" Class) | 32" Class (31.5" Viewable) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 2560 x 1440 (WQHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | IPS (In-Plane Switching) | VA (Vertical Alignment) |
Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 165 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 144 Hz (via HDMI) |
Response Time | 5 ms (GtG) | 1 ms (MPRT) |
Brightness | 250 nits (Typical) | 300 nits (Typical) / 200 nits (Min) |
Contrast | 1,000:1 (Native) / 20,000,000:1 (Dynamic) | 2,500:1 (Static) |
Color Gamut | 72% NTSC (Approx. 100% sRGB) | Not officially specified (Approx. 99% sRGB) |
Color Depth | 16.7M (8-bit) | 16.7M (8-bit) |
HDR | No (Not supported) | HDR10 (Software support) |
Adaptive Sync | No (Not supported) | AMD FreeSync Premium |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | 1000R |
Speakers | 2x 1 W (Stereo) | No (None) |
Ports | 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x VGA; 1x 3.5mm Audio In; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out | 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x HDMI 2.0; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out; 1x USB (Service only) |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 75 x 75 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 20°) | Tilt only (-2° to 18°) |
Power Consumption | 16 W (Energy Star) / 27 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) | 39 W (Typical) / 59 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) |
Weight With Stand | 3,840 g (8.47 lbs) | 5,700 g (12.57 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
60 Hz
5 ms (GtG)
Pros
- Exclusive 'Brightness Intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light
- Flicker-Free and Low Blue Light technologies are certified by TÜV Rheinland
Cons
- Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not suitable for gaming)
- Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments
SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor
32" Class (31.5" Viewable)
2560 x 1440 (WQHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
165 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 144 Hz (via HDMI)
1 ms (MPRT)
Pros
- Aggressive 1000R curvature matches the human eye's field of view for maximum immersion
- 165Hz refresh rate and 1ms (MPRT) deliver smooth, responsive gameplay
Cons
- Stand is basic with Tilt-only adjustment (no height or swivel)
- Brightness (300 nits) is insufficient for a impactful HDR experience
Which one is better?
The SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 165Hz refresh rate crushes the BenQ's 60Hz, making it far superior for gaming.
Who should buy each?
Choose the BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor if: you work long hours at a desk, value eye comfort with low blue light, or need a budget-friendly option. (23.8" display, 60 Hz refresh)
Choose the SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor if: you play fast-paced games, want a larger screen for immersion, or need higher resolution for multitasking. (32" display, 165 Hz refresh)
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.4★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose BenQ GW2480
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 19,967 reviews vs 2,537
→ Choose BenQ GW2480
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose SAMSUNG Odyssey
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose BenQ GW2480
Conclusion
There is no wrong answer here. Focus on the features you will use daily and pick the model that aligns with them.
Bottom line: The BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor edges ahead with a 4.6★ rating compared to 4.4★. However, SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor remains a strong contender if its strengths align better with your needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor or SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor?
BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize exclusive 'brightness intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light. SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor wins if you value aggressive 1000r curvature matches the human eye's field of view for maximum immersion. Both are rated highly (4.6★ vs 4.4★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor and SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor?
Key differences: BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor offers exclusive 'brightness intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light, while SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor stands out with aggressive 1000r curvature matches the human eye's field of view for maximum immersion. Consider that BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor limited to 60hz refresh rate (not suitable for gaming). Meanwhile, SAMSUNG Odyssey G55A 32" Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor stand is basic with tilt-only adjustment (no height or swivel). Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.