BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor vs Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor
Get the BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor unless you really need that extra screen size. The numbers tell the story: 360Hz refresh rate vs 200Hz means smoother gameplay in competitive scenarios. After testing both, you'll find that the BenQ excels in motion clarity, thanks to its 0.5 ms response time and DyAc+ technology. However, if you prefer an ultrawide experience for immersive gaming or multitasking, the Sceptre's 30" curved display offers a unique advantage with a wider field of view.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor

Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor vs Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor

BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor

Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor
| Criterion | BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor | Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.5(254)Amazon | ★4.5(162)Amazon |
Screen Size | 24.5" Viewable (25" Class) | 30" Diagonal Viewable |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 2560 x 1080 (WFHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 21:9 |
Screen Type | TN (Fast TN) | VA (Vertical Alignment) |
Refresh Rate | 360 Hz | 200 Hz (DisplayPort); 165 Hz (HDMI 2.0); 75 Hz (HDMI 1.4) |
Response Time | 0.5 ms (GtG) | 5 ms (GtG); 1 ms (MPRT / Blur Reduction) |
Brightness | 320 nits (Typical) | 320 cd/m² (Typical) |
Contrast | 1,000:1 (Typical) | 3,000:1 (Static) |
Color Gamut | Not specified (Standard sRGB coverage) | 99% sRGB |
Color Depth | 8-bit | 16.7M (8-bit) |
HDR | No (Not supported) | Yes (HDR400 Signal Support; Edge-lit) |
Adaptive Sync | Variable Refresh Rate (DyAc+ must be OFF) | AMD FreeSync Premium |
Viewing Angles | 170° (H) / 160° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | Flat | 1500R |
Speakers | No (None) | Yes (2x 3W, 4Ω) |
Ports | 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out; 1x Mini-USB (for S-Switch only) | 1x DisplayPort 1.2 (200Hz); 1x HDMI 2.0 (165Hz); 2x HDMI 1.4 (75Hz); 1x 3.5mm Audio Out |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 75 x 75 mm |
Ergonomics | Height (155mm), Tilt (-5° to 23°), Swivel (-45° to 45°), Pivot (90°) | Height adj. (4.08" - 8.61"); Tilt (-5° to 20°); Swivel (±25°) |
Power Consumption | 40 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) | 45 W (Typical); 52 W (Max) |
Weight With Stand | 6,200 g (13.67 lbs) | 6,200 g (13.67 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • 360Hz refresh rate on a Fast TN panel delivers the clearest motion clarity available for esports
- • DyAc+ technology drastically reduces motion blur (strobing), giving a competitive edge in shooters like CS2/Valorant
- • Includes S-Switch puck for instant profile switching and Shielding Hoods to block distractions
- • Fully adjustable stand with height markers allows for consistent ergonomic setup at tournaments
- • XL Setting to Share allows users to download and apply pro players' exact monitor settings
✗ Cons:
- • TN panel viewing angles and color reproduction are inferior to IPS/OLED alternatives
- • DyAc+ cannot be used simultaneously with Variable Refresh Rate (FreeSync/G-Sync)
- • 1080p resolution is low for general productivity or media consumption
- • No USB-C or modern connectivity features outside of pure video inputs
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • High-speed 200Hz refresh rate (via DisplayPort) provides fluid motion for racing and FPS games
- • Deep 3,000:1 contrast ratio typical of VA panels creates rich blacks
- • Versatile connectivity with 4 total video inputs (1x DP, 3x HDMI)
- • Includes a fully adjustable stand (Height, Tilt, Swivel) which is rare at this price point
- • Unique white chassis ('Nebula White') stands out from standard black monitors
✗ Cons:
- • Resolution (2560x1080) has lower pixel density than 1440p, making text look less sharp
- • HDMI ports are limited to lower refresh rates (165Hz and 75Hz) compared to DisplayPort
- • VA panel technology causes some 'black smearing' in dark transitions compared to IPS
- • HDR performance is entry-level due to edge-lit dimming and limited peak brightness
- • Stand footprint is somewhat deep, requiring ample desk space
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 360Hz refresh rate crushes the Sceptre's 200Hz.
Who should buy each?
Choose the BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor if: you play competitive FPS games, need the fastest response time, or want the clearest motion clarity. (24.5" display, 360 Hz refresh)
Choose the Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor if: you love an ultrawide experience, want deeper blacks for cinematic games, or need a budget option with decent gaming performance. (30" display, 200 Hz refresh)
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K 24.5" FHD 360Hz Esports Monitor excels if you value 360hz refresh rate on a fast tn panel delivers the clearest motion clarity available for esports. Sceptre C305B-FUN200W 30" Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor is better if you prioritize high-speed 200hz refresh rate (via displayport) provides fluid motion for racing and fps games. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
