Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Garmin Vivoactive 5
The Garmin Forerunner 165 and Garmin Vivoactive 5 are two impressive smartwatches that cater to fitness enthusiasts and casual users alike. Both devices feature AMOLED displays with a resolution of 390 x 390 pixels and boast impressive battery life, making them suitable for extended use. While they share some similarities in design and connectivity options, they target slightly different audiences based on their features and functionalities. The Forerunner 165 is more focused on running and training metrics, while the Vivoactive 5 leans toward general fitness and wellness features.
Why compare these? Both the Garmin Forerunner 165 and Garmin Vivoactive 5 are mid-range smartwatches competing in the same market segment. This makes them direct rivals for buyers looking for mid-range features and performance in 2026. Understanding their differences helps you choose the right one for your specific needs.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Garmin Forerunner | Garmin Vivoactive |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | ✓4.6★ (1,697 reviews) | 4.4★ (9,944 reviews) |
| Top Strength | AMOLED display is vivid and always-on — a first at this Garmin price tier | Ultra-lightweight design at just 23g (case only) — extremely comfortable all day |
| Main Drawback | No multi-band/dual-frequency GPS — less precise than Forerunner 265 in cities | No music storage — unlike the Forerunner 165/265 |
| Market Position | Mid-range | Mid-range |
Garmin Forerunner 165
1.2 inches
AMOLED, always-on capable
390 x 390 pixels
4 GB (music playback supported via Spotify, Deezer)
Garmin Vivoactive 5
1.2 inches
AMOLED, always-on capable
390 x 390 pixels
4 GB
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Garmin Vivoactive 5
Garmin Forerunner 165
Garmin Vivoactive 5
| Criterion | Garmin Forerunner 165 | Garmin Vivoactive 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(1,697)Amazon | ★4.4(9,944)Amazon |
Display Size | 1.2 inches | 1.2 inches |
Screen Type | AMOLED, always-on capable | AMOLED, always-on capable |
Resolution | 390 x 390 pixels | 390 x 390 pixels |
Storage | 4 GB (music playback supported via Spotify, Deezer) | 4 GB |
Sensors | Multi-GNSS GPS (GPS/GLONASS/GALILEO), wrist HR, SpO2, accelerometer, barometric altimeter | GPS/GNSS, wrist HR, SpO2, barometric altimeter, compass, accelerometer, stress |
Battery Life | Up to 11 days (smartwatch) / up to 19 hours (GPS) / up to 10 hours (GPS + music) | Up to 11 days (smartwatch mode) / up to 21 hours (GPS mode) |
Water Resistance | 5 ATM (50 m) | 5 ATM (50 m) |
Connectivity | Bluetooth, ANT+, Wi-Fi (music sync), multi-band GPS | Bluetooth, ANT+, Wi-Fi, GPS (multi-GNSS) |
Operating System | Garmin Connect app (iOS and Android) | Garmin Connect app (iOS and Android) |
Weight | 39 g | 23 g (without band) |
Extras | Recovery Advisor, Body Battery, morning report, race predictor, Garmin Pay, sleep tracking | 30+ built-in sports apps, Garmin Pay, Body Battery, sleep tracking, women's health, animated on-device workouts |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Garmin Forerunner 165
1.2 inches
AMOLED, always-on capable
390 x 390 pixels
4 GB (music playback supported via Spotify, Deezer)
Multi-GNSS GPS (GPS/GLONASS/GALILEO), wrist HR, SpO2, accelerometer, barometric altimeter
Up to 11 days (smartwatch) / up to 19 hours (GPS) / up to 10 hours (GPS + music)
Pros
- AMOLED display is vivid and always-on — a first at this Garmin price tier
- 11-day battery life is impressive for an AMOLED-equipped running watch
Cons
- No multi-band/dual-frequency GPS — less precise than Forerunner 265 in cities
- No onscreen mapping or navigation
Garmin Vivoactive 5
1.2 inches
AMOLED, always-on capable
390 x 390 pixels
4 GB
GPS/GNSS, wrist HR, SpO2, barometric altimeter, compass, accelerometer, stress
Up to 11 days (smartwatch mode) / up to 21 hours (GPS mode)
Pros
- Ultra-lightweight design at just 23g (case only) — extremely comfortable all day
- AMOLED always-on display with 11-day battery — best balance in its class
Cons
- No music storage — unlike the Forerunner 165/265
- No multi-band/dual-frequency GPS
Which one is better?
In terms of overall functionality and features, the Garmin Forerunner 165 takes the lead, especially for serious runners and athletes who benefit from its advanced training tools and music storage capabilities. However, the Vivoactive 5 excels in comfort and versatility, offering a lightweight design and a variety of built-in sports modes. Ultimately, the best choice depends on the user's specific needs; athletes may prefer the Forerunner 165, while casual users might appreciate the broader fitness features of the Vivoactive 5.
Who should buy each?
For dedicated runners and athletes looking for advanced metrics, music storage, and comprehensive tracking features, the Garmin Forerunner 165 is the better option. On the other hand, if you're a casual fitness enthusiast or someone who values comfort and a variety of sports modes, the Vivoactive 5 is an excellent choice that provides solid performance without the added complexity.
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.4★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose Garmin Forerunner
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 9,944 reviews vs 1,697
→ Choose Garmin Vivoactive
AMOLED display is Priority
AMOLED display is vivid and always-on — a first at this Garmin price tier
→ Choose Garmin Forerunner
Ultra-lightweight design at Priority
Ultra-lightweight design at just 23g (case only) — extremely comfortable all day
→ Choose Garmin Vivoactive
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Bottom line: The Garmin Forerunner 165 edges ahead with a 4.6★ rating compared to 4.4★. However, Garmin Vivoactive 5 remains a strong contender if its strengths align better with your needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Garmin Forerunner 165 or Garmin Vivoactive 5?
Garmin Forerunner 165 is the better choice if you prioritize amoled display is vivid and always-on — a first at this garmin price tier. Garmin Vivoactive 5 wins if you value ultra-lightweight design at just 23g (case only) — extremely comfortable all day. Both are rated highly (4.6★ vs 4.4★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Garmin Forerunner 165 and Garmin Vivoactive 5?
Key differences: Garmin Forerunner 165 offers amoled display is vivid and always-on — a first at this garmin price tier, while Garmin Vivoactive 5 stands out with ultra-lightweight design at just 23g (case only) — extremely comfortable all day. Consider that Garmin Forerunner 165 no multi-band/dual-frequency gps — less precise than forerunner 265 in cities. Meanwhile, Garmin Vivoactive 5 no music storage — unlike the forerunner 165/265. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+What should I prioritize when choosing between these smartwatches?
Focus on the features that matter most for your daily use. Garmin Forerunner 165 stands out for amoled display is vivid and always-on — a first at this garmin price tier and 11-day battery life is impressive for an amoled-equipped running watch. Garmin Vivoactive 5 excels at ultra-lightweight design at just 23g (case only) — extremely comfortable all day and amoled always-on display with 11-day battery — best balance in its class. Check the spec table above for the complete side-by-side breakdown.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.