Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) vs Amazfit Balance
The Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) is the premium option here, delivering a standout 2000 nits display and in-depth running metrics. However, it requires daily charging with a battery life of only 24 hours, making it a bit of a hassle for some users. On the flip side, the Amazfit Balance offers an impressive 14 days of battery life, and it's incredibly lightweight at just 1.23 oz. In real-world use, if you prioritize wellness features and longer battery life, the Amazfit Balance might just steal the show despite being the mid-range contender. Key specs: Weight: 1.31 oz vs 1.23 oz and Storage: 32 GB vs 2.2 GB.
Why compare these? The Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) (high-end) and Amazfit Balance (mid-range) represent different approaches to smartwatches. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Google Pixel | Amazfit Balance |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.4★ (1,794 reviews) | 4.4★ (1,543 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Significantly larger and brighter display (2000 nits) than predecessors | Extremely lightweight design (1.23 oz) for its 46mm size |
| Main Drawback | Battery life rated for only 24h with AOD (daily charging required) | Zepp Pay ecosystem is limited compared to Apple or Google Pay |
| Market Position | ✓Premium | Mid-range |
Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm)
Android 10.0 or newer (requires Google Account and Pixel Watch app); Not compatible with iOS
Wear OS 5.0
45mm diameter x 12.3mm height
100% recycled aluminum housing; Custom 3D Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Amazfit Balance
Android 7.0 and above; iOS 14.0 and above
Zepp OS 4
46mm (1.81 x 1.81 x 0.42 inches; without heart rate base)
Aluminum alloy middle frame; fiber-reinforced polymer bottom shell
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) vs Amazfit Balance
Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm)
Amazfit Balance
| Criterion | Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) | Amazfit Balance |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.4(1,794)Amazon | ★4.4(1,543)Amazon |
Compatibility | Android 10.0 or newer (requires Google Account and Pixel Watch app); Not compatible with iOS | Android 7.0 and above; iOS 14.0 and above |
Operating System | Wear OS 5.0 | Zepp OS 4 |
Case Size | 45mm diameter x 12.3mm height | 46mm (1.81 x 1.81 x 0.42 inches; without heart rate base) |
Case Material | 100% recycled aluminum housing; Custom 3D Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Aluminum alloy middle frame; fiber-reinforced polymer bottom shell |
Display Type | Actua Display (AMOLED LTPO); 1–60Hz responsive refresh rate; Peak brightness 2000 nits; Minimum 1 nit | AMOLED (tempered glass; anti-glare bezel; anti-fingerprint coating) |
Display Size | 1.4 in (approx. 40% more screen area than Pixel Watch 2) | 1.5" |
Resolution | 456 x 456 pixels (320 ppi); DCI-P3 color | 480 x 480 (323 ppi) |
Always On Display | Yes | Yes (AOD mode supported) |
Water Resistance | 5 ATM (ISO 22810:2010); IP68 (Dust and water resistant) | 5 ATM (up to 164 feet) |
Durability | IP68 dust and water resistance rating; Custom 3D Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Tempered glass with anti-glare bezel; aluminum alloy frame |
GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | Circularly-polarized GPS antenna; dual-band positioning; 6 satellite positioning systems |
Connectivity | 4G LTE (optional); Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) 2.4GHz + 5GHz; Bluetooth 5.3; NFC; Ultra-Wideband (UWB) | WLAN 2.4GHz; Bluetooth 5.3 |
NFC Payments | Google Wallet | Zepp Pay (supported in select regions and banks only) |
Sensors | Compass; Altimeter; Red and infrared sensors for oxygen saturation (SpO2); Multipurpose electrical sensors (ECG); Multi-path optical heart rate sensor; 3-axis accelerometer; Gyroscope; Ambient light sensor; cEDA sensor (stress); Skin temperature sensor; Ultra-Wideband | BioTracker 5.0 PPG biometric sensor (8PD + 2LED); BIA bioelectric impedance sensor; 3-axis acceleration sensor; Gyroscope sensor; Geomagnetic sensor; Air pressure sensor; Ambient light sensor; Temperature sensor |
Health Features | Loss of Pulse Detection; Daily Readiness; Cardio Load; Target Load; Sleep Profile; ECG app; SpO2; High/low heart rate notifications; Irregular heart rhythm notifications; Skin temperature variations; Body Response (stress detection) | Readiness score; 24/7 heart rate, SpO2, and stress monitoring; sleep tracking (incl. breathing quality); one-tap health measurement; body composition measurement (BIA) |
Workout Modes | Advanced Running Form (Cadence, Stride Length, Vertical Oscillation, Ground Contact Time); Custom Runs; Interval Training; 40+ exercise modes including HIIT, Pilates, Strength, Cross-country skiing, and more | 156 sports modes; Zepp Coach; offline maps and navigation; training templates + interval training; supports external peripherals (HR belt, cycling power meter) |
Storage | 32GB eMMC flash | Music storage (approx. 2.2GB available) |
Speaker Mic | Built-in speaker; Built-in microphone | Microphone: supported; speaker: supported |
Calls | Yes (Bluetooth); LTE models support standalone calls | Yes (Bluetooth phone calls) |
Battery | 420 mAh (typical); Up to 24 hours (Always-on Display enabled); Up to 36 hours (Battery Saver mode) | 475 mAh; up to 14 days typical use; up to 25 days battery saver; up to 5 days AOD; up to 26 hours (Accuracy GPS mode); up to 52 hours (Power Saving GPS mode) |
Charging | USB-C Fast Charging Cable (included); 0–50% in ~28 min; 0–80% in ~50 min; 0–100% in ~80 min | Magnetic charging; approx. 2 hours |
Weight | 37 g (without band) | 1.23 oz (without strap) |
Band Sizes | Active Band: Small fits 150–185 mm wrists; Large fits 165–215 mm wrists | 22mm width; silicone fits wrists 5.51–8.46 inches; nylon fits wrists 5.51–8.27 inches |
Extras | UWB for Watch Unlock and finding devices; Google Home control; Camera Remote for Pixel phones; Offline Google Maps; Recorder app | Zepp Flow AI voice assistant; Amazon Alexa integrated; offline voice assistant; mini apps ecosystem; quick reply on Android (supported apps vary) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm)
Android 10.0 or newer (requires Google Account and Pixel Watch app); Not compatible with iOS
Wear OS 5.0
45mm diameter x 12.3mm height
100% recycled aluminum housing; Custom 3D Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Actua Display (AMOLED LTPO); 1–60Hz responsive refresh rate; Peak brightness 2000 nits; Minimum 1 nit
1.4 in (approx. 40% more screen area than Pixel Watch 2)
Pros
- Significantly larger and brighter display (2000 nits) than predecessors
- Advanced running metrics (stride, oscillation) without external pods
Cons
- Battery life rated for only 24h with AOD (daily charging required)
- Strictly incompatible with iPhone (Android 10+ only)
Amazfit Balance
Android 7.0 and above; iOS 14.0 and above
Zepp OS 4
46mm (1.81 x 1.81 x 0.42 inches; without heart rate base)
Aluminum alloy middle frame; fiber-reinforced polymer bottom shell
AMOLED (tempered glass; anti-glare bezel; anti-fingerprint coating)
1.5"
Pros
- Extremely lightweight design (1.23 oz) for its 46mm size
- Advanced wellness toolkit including Readiness score and Body Composition analysis
Cons
- Zepp Pay ecosystem is limited compared to Apple or Google Pay
- Significant battery impact when Always-On Display is enabled (drops to 5 days)
Which one is better?
The Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) is the better buy for most people - its stunning 2000 nits display crushes the Amazfit Balance. That said, grab the Amazfit Balance if you need an ultra-lightweight smartwatch with 14 days of battery life.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) if: you want a bright 2000 nits display for outdoor visibility, need advanced running metrics, or prefer deep integration with Google services.
Choose the Amazfit Balance if: you want to save money, need a smartwatch that lasts up to 14 days, or prefer a lightweight design for everyday wear.
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose Google Pixel
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose Amazfit Balance
Significantly larger and Priority
Significantly larger and brighter display (2000 nits) than predecessors
→ Choose Google Pixel
Extremely lightweight design Priority
Extremely lightweight design (1.23 oz) for its 46mm size
→ Choose Amazfit Balance
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Bottom line: Both products share a 4.4★ rating, making this comparison particularly close. Your decision should come down to which specific features matter most to you.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) or Amazfit Balance?
Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) is the better choice if you prioritize significantly larger and brighter display (2000 nits) than predecessors. Amazfit Balance wins if you value extremely lightweight design (1.23 oz) for its 46mm size. Both are rated highly (4.4★ vs 4.4★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) and Amazfit Balance?
Key differences: Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) offers significantly larger and brighter display (2000 nits) than predecessors, while Amazfit Balance stands out with extremely lightweight design (1.23 oz) for its 46mm size. Consider that Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) battery life rated for only 24h with aod (daily charging required). Meanwhile, Amazfit Balance zepp pay ecosystem is limited compared to apple or google pay. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 27, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.