Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) vs Amazfit Falcon
If you're deciding between the Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) and the Amazfit Falcon, the Pixel Watch takes the lead with its stunning 1.4" display boasting 2000 nits of brightness. In real-world usage, this means you can easily read notifications in bright sunlight without straining your eyes. On the flip side, the Amazfit Falcon shines with its 20 ATM water resistance, allowing you to dive up to 656 feet without worry. For everyday use, the Pixel Watch's battery lasts about 36 hours in Saver mode, while the Falcon can stretch up to 14 days under typical conditions, making it a strong fit for extended adventures without frequent charging. Key specs: Weight: 1.31 oz vs 2.26 oz and Storage: 32 GB vs 4 GB.
Why compare these? The Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) (high-end) and Amazfit Falcon (mid-range) represent different approaches to smartwatches. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Google Pixel | Amazfit Falcon |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.4★ (1,794 reviews) | 4.4★ (557 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Significantly larger and brighter display (2000 nits) than predecessors | Elite build quality: Titanium unibody with Sapphire Crystal |
| Main Drawback | Battery life rated for only 24h with AOD (daily charging required) | Uses older BioTracker 3.0 sensor (newer models use 5.0/6.0) |
| Market Position | ✓Premium | Mid-range |
Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm)
Android 10.0 or newer (requires Google Account and Pixel Watch app); Not compatible with iOS
Wear OS 5.0
45mm diameter x 12.3mm height
100% recycled aluminum housing; Custom 3D Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Amazfit Falcon
Android 7.0 or later; iOS 12.0 or later (Zepp App required)
Zepp OS (Proprietary)
49mm (49.45 x 47.2 x 12.95 mm)
Titanium unibody; Sapphire Crystal glass; Titanium bezel
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) vs Amazfit Falcon
Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm)
Amazfit Falcon
| Criterion | Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) | Amazfit Falcon |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.4(1,794)Amazon | ★4.4(557)Amazon |
Compatibility | Android 10.0 or newer (requires Google Account and Pixel Watch app); Not compatible with iOS | Android 7.0 or later; iOS 12.0 or later (Zepp App required) |
Operating System | Wear OS 5.0 | Zepp OS (Proprietary) |
Case Size | 45mm diameter x 12.3mm height | 49mm (49.45 x 47.2 x 12.95 mm) |
Case Material | 100% recycled aluminum housing; Custom 3D Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Titanium unibody; Sapphire Crystal glass; Titanium bezel |
Display Type | Actua Display (AMOLED LTPO); 1–60Hz responsive refresh rate; Peak brightness 2000 nits; Minimum 1 nit | AMOLED; Always-On Display supported; Anti-fingerprint coating |
Display Size | 1.4 in (approx. 40% more screen area than Pixel Watch 2) | 1.28 in (32.5 mm) diameter |
Resolution | 456 x 456 pixels (320 ppi); DCI-P3 color | 416 x 416 pixels (326 ppi) |
Always On Display | Yes | Yes |
Water Resistance | 5 ATM (ISO 22810:2010); IP68 (Dust and water resistant) | 20 ATM (water pressure equivalent to 200 meters); High-speed water sports capable |
Durability | IP68 dust and water resistance rating; Custom 3D Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | MIL-STD-810G tested; Titanium unibody; Sapphire crystal screen |
GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | Dual-band GNSS; 6 Satellite Positioning Systems (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NAVIC) |
Connectivity | 4G LTE (optional); Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) 2.4GHz + 5GHz; Bluetooth 5.3; NFC; Ultra-Wideband (UWB) | WLAN 2.4GHz; Bluetooth 5.0 BLE |
NFC Payments | Google Wallet | No |
Sensors | Compass; Altimeter; Red and infrared sensors for oxygen saturation (SpO2); Multipurpose electrical sensors (ECG); Multi-path optical heart rate sensor; 3-axis accelerometer; Gyroscope; Ambient light sensor; cEDA sensor (stress); Skin temperature sensor; Ultra-Wideband | BioTracker™ 3.0 PPG biometric sensor (supports blood-oxygen, 6PD); Accelerometer; Gyroscope; Geomagnetic sensor; Barometric altimeter; Ambient light sensor |
Health Features | Loss of Pulse Detection; Daily Readiness; Cardio Load; Target Load; Sleep Profile; ECG app; SpO2; High/low heart rate notifications; Irregular heart rhythm notifications; Skin temperature variations; Body Response (stress detection) | Zepp Coach (AI-powered training guidance); 24H Heart Rate; SpO2; Stress monitoring; Sleep tracking (Light, Deep, REM); SomnusCare™ sleep score; Breathing exercises |
Workout Modes | Advanced Running Form (Cadence, Stride Length, Vertical Oscillation, Ground Contact Time); Custom Runs; Interval Training; 40+ exercise modes including HIIT, Pilates, Strength, Cross-country skiing, and more | Triathlon; Track Run (with lap data correction); Strength Training (auto-detection of 25 movements); Golf Swing; Skiing; High-speed water sports; and 150+ others |
Storage | 32GB eMMC flash | 4GB total (Approx. 2.3GB user-accessible for music) |
Speaker Mic | Built-in speaker; Built-in microphone | None (Bluetooth headphones required for music/audio feedback) |
Calls | Yes (Bluetooth); LTE models support standalone calls | No (Notification alerts only) |
Battery | 420 mAh (typical); Up to 24 hours (Always-on Display enabled); Up to 36 hours (Battery Saver mode) | 500 mAh; Up to 14 days (Typical usage); Up to 7 days (Heavy usage); Up to 21 hours (Accuracy GPS mode); Up to 50 hours (Power Saving GPS mode) |
Charging | USB-C Fast Charging Cable (included); 0–50% in ~28 min; 0–80% in ~50 min; 0–100% in ~80 min | 5-pin plug charger; Approx. 2 hours to full charge |
Weight | 37 g (without band) | 64 g (Body only) |
Band Sizes | Active Band: Small fits 150–185 mm wrists; Large fits 165–215 mm wrists | 22mm width; Fits 150–205 mm wrists (Liquid Silicone strap included) |
Extras | UWB for Watch Unlock and finding devices; Google Home control; Camera Remote for Pixel phones; Offline Google Maps; Recorder app | Offline Maps (Import route files); Real-time navigation; Music storage (MP3); Broadcast heart rate via Bluetooth; External workout device support (Heart rate belts, power meters) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm)
Android 10.0 or newer (requires Google Account and Pixel Watch app); Not compatible with iOS
Wear OS 5.0
45mm diameter x 12.3mm height
100% recycled aluminum housing; Custom 3D Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Actua Display (AMOLED LTPO); 1–60Hz responsive refresh rate; Peak brightness 2000 nits; Minimum 1 nit
1.4 in (approx. 40% more screen area than Pixel Watch 2)
Pros
- Significantly larger and brighter display (2000 nits) than predecessors
- Advanced running metrics (stride, oscillation) without external pods
Cons
- Battery life rated for only 24h with AOD (daily charging required)
- Strictly incompatible with iPhone (Android 10+ only)
Amazfit Falcon
Android 7.0 or later; iOS 12.0 or later (Zepp App required)
Zepp OS (Proprietary)
49mm (49.45 x 47.2 x 12.95 mm)
Titanium unibody; Sapphire Crystal glass; Titanium bezel
AMOLED; Always-On Display supported; Anti-fingerprint coating
1.28 in (32.5 mm) diameter
Pros
- Elite build quality: Titanium unibody with Sapphire Crystal
- 20 ATM water resistance is double that of most outdoor watches
Cons
- Uses older BioTracker 3.0 sensor (newer models use 5.0/6.0)
- No speaker or microphone for calls or voice assistants
Which one is better?
The Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) is the better buy for most people - its 1.4" display at 2000 nits crushes the Amazfit Falcon's smaller screen. That said, grab the Falcon if you need serious water resistance for outdoor activities - its 20 ATM rating is double that of the Pixel Watch.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) if: you want a stunning display for notifications, need advanced health metrics for your workouts, or prefer deep integration with the Google ecosystem. (1.31 oz weight, 32 GB storage)
Choose the Amazfit Falcon if: you want extended battery life for outdoor adventures, need superior water resistance for diving, or prefer a durable build for rugged use. (2.26 oz weight, 4 GB storage)
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 1,794 reviews vs 557
→ Choose Google Pixel
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose Google Pixel
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose Amazfit Falcon
Significantly larger and Priority
Significantly larger and brighter display (2000 nits) than predecessors
→ Choose Google Pixel
Conclusion
There is no wrong answer here. Focus on the features you will use daily and pick the model that aligns with them.
Bottom line: Both products share a 4.4★ rating, making this comparison particularly close. Your decision should come down to which specific features matter most to you.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) or Amazfit Falcon?
Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) is the better choice if you prioritize significantly larger and brighter display (2000 nits) than predecessors. Amazfit Falcon wins if you value elite build quality: titanium unibody with sapphire crystal. Both are rated highly (4.4★ vs 4.4★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) and Amazfit Falcon?
Key differences: Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) offers significantly larger and brighter display (2000 nits) than predecessors, while Amazfit Falcon stands out with elite build quality: titanium unibody with sapphire crystal. Consider that Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) battery life rated for only 24h with aod (daily charging required). Meanwhile, Amazfit Falcon uses older biotracker 3.0 sensor (newer models use 5.0/6.0). Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 27, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.