HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless vs Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones
The HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless is the premium option here, boasting a staggering 300 hours of battery life compared to the Beats Solo 4's 50 hours. After testing both, the comfort and sound quality of the HyperX make it worth the investment for serious gamers and long sessions. However, the Beats Solo 4 shines in portability and quick charging, with a mere 10-minute charge giving you 5 hours of playback, perfect for on-the-go users in 2026. Key specs: Battery: 300h vs 50h and Microphone: Detachable vs Digital beam-forming.
Why compare these? Both the HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless and Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones are mid-range headphones competing in the same market segment. This makes them direct rivals for buyers looking for mid-range features and performance in 2026. Understanding their differences helps you choose the right one for your specific needs.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | HyperX Cloud | Beats Solo |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.2★ (5,989 reviews) | ✓4.6★ (23,077 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Unmatched 300-hour battery life requires charging only a few times a year | Exceptional 50-hour battery life with Fast Fuel charging |
| Main Drawback | Complete lack of backup connectivity (no Bluetooth and no 3.5mm wired mode) | No Active Noise Cancelling (ANC) |
| Market Position | Mid-range | Mid-range |
HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless
Over-ear (closed-back)
2.4GHz Wireless (via USB-A dongle)
N/A (Not supported)
N/A (Not supported)
Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones
On-ear
Class 1 Bluetooth 5.3; USB-C audio (lossless); 3.5 mm analog input
5.3
SBC, AAC
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless vs Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones
HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless
Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones
| Criterion | HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless | Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.2(5,989)Amazon | ★4.6(23,077)Amazon |
Form Factor | Over-ear (closed-back) | On-ear |
Connectivity | 2.4GHz Wireless (via USB-A dongle) | Class 1 Bluetooth 5.3; USB-C audio (lossless); 3.5 mm analog input |
Bluetooth Version | N/A (Not supported) | 5.3 |
Codecs | N/A (Not supported) | SBC, AAC |
ANC | No (Passive noise isolation only) | No (Passive noise isolation only) |
Transparency | No (Not supported) | No (Not supported) |
Drivers | 50mm Dual Chamber Dynamic Drivers | 40 mm custom-built transducers |
Frequency Response | 15 Hz – 21,000 Hz | N/A (Manufacturer does not publish) |
Microphones | Detachable Bi-directional Noise-cancelling Mic (with LED mute indicator) | Digital beam-forming microphones with voice-targeting algorithm |
Battery Life | Up to 300 hours | Up to 50 hours |
Battery Life | N/A (No charging case) | N/A (Headphones only) |
Charging | USB-C; 0-100% in approx. 4.5 hours | USB-C (Fast Fuel: 10 min charge = up to 5 hours playback) |
Multipoint | No (Single source connection) | No (No simultaneous multi-device connection) |
Low Latency Mode | Yes (2.4GHz Gaming Wireless) | No (Standard Bluetooth latency) |
Wired Mode | No (USB-C port is strictly for charging; no 3.5mm jack) | Yes (USB-C for lossless audio; 3.5 mm analog available without battery power) |
Water Resistance | No (No IP rating) | No (No IP rating) |
Weight | 11.8 oz (335 g) with mic / 11.1 oz (315 g) without mic | 217 g (7.65 oz) |
Controls | On-ear: Power, Mic Mute, Volume Wheel | Physical 'b' button (play/pause, calls, voice assistant), volume rocker |
App Eq | HyperX NGENUITY (Windows PC only) | No (No in-app EQ customization) |
Extras | DTS Headphone:X Spatial Audio (2-year activation code included); Dual Chamber technology | Personalized Spatial Audio with Dynamic Head Tracking; Built-in DAC; Audio Sharing (iOS); Find My (iOS) / Find My Device (Android); Foldable design |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless
Over-ear (closed-back)
2.4GHz Wireless (via USB-A dongle)
N/A (Not supported)
N/A (Not supported)
No (Passive noise isolation only)
No (Not supported)
Pros
- Unmatched 300-hour battery life requires charging only a few times a year
- Dual Chamber Drivers separate bass from mids/highs for reduced distortion
Cons
- Complete lack of backup connectivity (no Bluetooth and no 3.5mm wired mode)
- Microphone quality is heavily compressed to conserve battery life
Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones
On-ear
Class 1 Bluetooth 5.3; USB-C audio (lossless); 3.5 mm analog input
5.3
SBC, AAC
No (Passive noise isolation only)
No (Not supported)
Pros
- Exceptional 50-hour battery life with Fast Fuel charging
- Native lossless audio support via USB-C (built-in DAC)
Cons
- No Active Noise Cancelling (ANC)
- No Transparency / Ambient mode
Which one is better?
The HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless is the better buy for most people - its 300-hour battery life crushes the Beats Solo 4's 50 hours. That said, grab the Beats if you need something lighter at 7.65oz and enjoy quick charging capabilities.
Who should buy each?
Choose the HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless if: you game extensively and need long battery life, prefer over-ear comfort for hours, or want premium sound quality with minimal distortion. (11.82 oz weight)
Choose the Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones if: you value portability with a lightweight design, need quick charging for short trips, or want seamless connectivity with both iOS and Android devices. (7.65 oz weight)
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.2★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose Beats Solo
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 23,077 reviews vs 5,989
→ Choose Beats Solo
Unmatched 300-hour battery Priority
Unmatched 300-hour battery life requires charging only a few times a year
→ Choose HyperX Cloud
Exceptional 50-hour battery Priority
Exceptional 50-hour battery life with Fast Fuel charging
→ Choose Beats Solo
Conclusion
HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless and Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones are both solid choices. Match the strengths above to your budget and workflow to make the best call.
Bottom line: The Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones leads with a 4.6★ rating versus 4.2★. That said, HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless could still be the right pick depending on your specific priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless or Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones?
HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless is the better choice if you prioritize unmatched 300-hour battery life requires charging only a few times a year. Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones wins if you value exceptional 50-hour battery life with fast fuel charging. Both are rated highly (4.2★ vs 4.6★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless and Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones?
Key differences: HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless offers unmatched 300-hour battery life requires charging only a few times a year, while Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones stands out with exceptional 50-hour battery life with fast fuel charging. Consider that HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless complete lack of backup connectivity (no bluetooth and no 3.5mm wired mode). Meanwhile, Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones no active noise cancelling (anc). Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: February 6, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.