Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K vs Intel Core i7-14700K
The Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K is the premium option here, delivering impressive specs like 76MB of cache and a max turbo power of 250W. In real-world use, the 285K excels in power efficiency and thermal management with a max temperature of 105°C, making it cooler during intense gaming sessions. On the flip side, the i7-14700K's additional E-cores provide a significant boost for multi-core tasks, so consider your primary use case when deciding between these two monsters.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K
Intel Core i7-14700K
Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K vs Intel Core i7-14700K
Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K
Intel Core i7-14700K
| Criterion | Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K | Intel Core i7-14700K |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(512)Amazon | ★4.6(10)Amazon |
Architecture Gen | Core Ultra 200S Series (Arrow Lake-S) | Raptor Lake Refresh (14th Gen Intel Core) |
Socket Platform | Socket LGA1851 | Socket LGA1700 (FCLGA1700) |
Cores Threads | 24 Cores (8P + 16E) / 24 Threads | 20 Cores (8P + 12E) / 28 Threads |
Base Boost Clock | P-Core: 3.7 / 5.5 GHz; E-Core: 3.2 / 4.6 GHz; Max Turbo: 5.7 GHz (TVB) | P-Core: 3.4 / 5.5 GHz; E-Core: 2.5 / 4.3 GHz; Max Turbo: 5.6 GHz |
Cache L2 L3 | 40 MB L2 + 36 MB L3 (76 MB Total) | 28 MB L2 + 33 MB L3 (61 MB Total) |
TDP Power | 125 W (Processor Base Power) | 125 W (Processor Base Power) |
Max Turbo Power | 250 W (Maximum Turbo Power) | 253 W (Maximum Turbo Power) |
Process Node | TSMC N3B (Compute Tile) / TSMC N6 (SoC/IO Tiles) | Intel 7 (10nm Enhanced SuperFin) |
Memory Support | DDR5-6400 MT/s (Official); Dual-Channel; Up to 192 GB; ECC Support: Yes (W880 chipset required) | DDR5-5600 or DDR4-3200; Dual-Channel; Up to 192 GB; ECC Support: Yes (W680 chipset required) |
Memory Bandwidth Max | N/A (Dependent on RAM config, theoretical max ~102.4 GB/s @ 6400 MT/s) | 89.6 GB/s (DDR5-5600) |
Pcie Version | PCIe 5.0 (x20 lanes) + PCIe 4.0 (x4 lanes) | PCIe 5.0 (x16 lanes) + PCIe 4.0 (x4 lanes) |
Pcie Lanes | 24 Total (20 Gen5 + 4 Gen4 Direct to CPU) | 20 Total (16 CPU PCIe 5.0 + 4 CPU PCIe 4.0) |
Igpu | Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores, 300 – 2000 MHz, Xe-LPG Architecture) | Intel UHD Graphics 770 (32 EUs, 300 – 1600 MHz) |
Instruction Features | Intel 64, AVX2, VNNI, AES-NI, VT-x, VT-d, SSE4.2; NPU: Intel AI Boost (13 TOPS) | Intel 64, AVX2, AES-NI, VT-x, VT-d, SSE4.1/4.2, Gaussian & Neural Accelerator 3.0 |
Cooler Included | No (360mm+ Liquid Cooler highly recommended) | No (360mm Liquid cooler highly recommended) |
Max Temp | 105°C (221°F) TjMax | 100°C (212°F) TjMax |
Notes Limits | First flagship Intel desktop CPU to drop Hyper-Threading (24 threads total vs 32 on 14900K). Higher thermal limit (105°C) by design. Requires LGA1851 motherboard (Z890). | Known for extremely high power draw and heat; often exceeds 253W limit on default motherboard settings. 4 extra E-cores vs i7-13700K. LGA1700 platform is end-of-life (no future upgrades). |
Chipset Support | Intel 800 Series (Z890, B860, H810, W880) | Intel 700 Series (Z790, B760, etc.) & 600 Series (BIOS update required) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K
✓ Pros:
- • Significantly improved power efficiency compared to 14th Gen
- • Lower operating temperatures in gaming workloads
- • Modern platform connectivity: Integrated Thunderbolt 4, WiFi 7, and more PCIe 5.0 lanes
✗ Cons:
- • Removal of Hyper-Threading reduces performance in some specific multi-threaded apps
- • Requires new LGA1851 motherboard (no backward compatibility)
- • Gaming performance is often similar to or slightly behind the i9-14900K
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Intel Core i7-14700K
✓ Pros:
- • Significant multi-core performance boost over 13700K (4 extra E-cores)
- • Excellent gaming performance, rivaling top-tier flagships
- • Versatile memory support (DDR4 for budget, DDR5 for performance)
✗ Cons:
- • Very high power consumption and thermal output
- • Requires a high-end cooling solution (360mm AIO recommended)
- • Dead-end platform (LGA1700) with no upgrade path to Core Ultra
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K is the better buy for most people - its 76MB cache crushes the i7-14700K's 61MB.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K if: you prioritize gaming efficiency with lower temps, need high cache for demanding applications, or want the newest tech with PCIe 5.0.
Choose the Intel Core i7-14700K if: you require extra threads for productivity tasks, want versatile memory support with DDR4/DDR5, or are looking to save money while still gaining excellent gaming performance.
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K excels if you value significantly improved power efficiency compared to 14th gen. Intel Core i7-14700K is better if you prioritize significant multi-core performance boost over 13700k (4 extra e-cores). Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.