Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K vs Intel Core i9-12900K
The Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K emerges as the top contender here, boasting 24 cores compared to the Intel Core i9-12900K’s 16 cores. This makes it a powerhouse for multitasking and gaming, especially in 2026 where efficiency matters more than ever. In real-world use, the Ultra 9's lower operating temperatures and improved power efficiency are game-changers. It operates at a max temp of 105°C, while the i9-12900K hits 100°C. If you’re gaming for hours or rendering videos, those few degrees can mean cooler performance and longer lifespan for your setup.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K
Intel Core i9-12900K
Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K vs Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K
Intel Core i9-12900K
| Criterion | Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K | Intel Core i9-12900K |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(512)Amazon | ★4.5(2,331)Amazon |
Architecture Gen | Core Ultra 200S Series (Arrow Lake-S) | Alder Lake (12th Gen Intel Core) |
Socket Platform | Socket LGA1851 | LGA1700 |
Cores Threads | 24 Cores (8P + 16E) / 24 Threads | 16 Cores (8 Performance + 8 Efficient) / 24 Threads |
Base Boost Clock | P-Core: 3.7 / 5.5 GHz; E-Core: 3.2 / 4.6 GHz; Max Turbo: 5.7 GHz (TVB) | P-core: 3.2–5.2 GHz / E-core: 2.4–3.9 GHz |
Cache L2 L3 | 40 MB L2 + 36 MB L3 (76 MB Total) | 30 MB Intel® Smart Cache (L3) + 14 MB L2 (44 MB Total) |
TDP Power | 125 W (Processor Base Power) | 125 W (Processor Base Power) |
Max Turbo Power | 250 W (Maximum Turbo Power) | 241 W (Maximum Turbo Power) |
Process Node | TSMC N3B (Compute Tile) / TSMC N6 (SoC/IO Tiles) | Intel 7 (10nm Enhanced SuperFin) |
Memory Support | DDR5-6400 MT/s (Official); Dual-Channel; Up to 192 GB; ECC Support: Yes (W880 chipset required) | DDR5-4800 MT/s / DDR4-3200 MT/s (Official); Up to 128 GB |
Memory Bandwidth Max | N/A (Dependent on RAM config, theoretical max ~102.4 GB/s @ 6400 MT/s) | 76.8 GB/s |
Pcie Version | PCIe 5.0 (x20 lanes) + PCIe 4.0 (x4 lanes) | PCIe 5.0 and 4.0 |
Pcie Lanes | 24 Total (20 Gen5 + 4 Gen4 Direct to CPU) | 20 (16 PCIe 5.0 + 4 PCIe 4.0) |
Igpu | Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores, 300 – 2000 MHz, Xe-LPG Architecture) | Intel UHD Graphics 770 (32 EUs, 1.55 GHz Dyn Max) |
Instruction Features | Intel 64, AVX2, VNNI, AES-NI, VT-x, VT-d, SSE4.2; NPU: Intel AI Boost (13 TOPS) | SSE4.1/4.2, AVX2, Intel 64, VT-x/VT-d, AES-NI, Gaussian & Neural Accelerator 3.0 |
Cooler Included | No (360mm+ Liquid Cooler highly recommended) | No (Heatsink not included) |
Max Temp | 105°C (221°F) TjMax | 100°C (212°F) Tjunction |
Notes Limits | First flagship Intel desktop CPU to drop Hyper-Threading (24 threads total vs 32 on 14900K). Higher thermal limit (105°C) by design. Requires LGA1851 motherboard (Z890). | Requires a robust liquid cooler (AIO) due to 241W turbo power. Unlocked for overclocking. |
Chipset Support | Intel 800 Series (Z890, B860, H810, W880) | Intel 600 and 700 Series (Z690, Z790, etc.) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K
✓ Pros:
- • Significantly improved power efficiency compared to 14th Gen
- • Lower operating temperatures in gaming workloads
- • Modern platform connectivity: Integrated Thunderbolt 4, WiFi 7, and more PCIe 5.0 lanes
✗ Cons:
- • Removal of Hyper-Threading reduces performance in some specific multi-threaded apps
- • Requires new LGA1851 motherboard (no backward compatibility)
- • Gaming performance is often similar to or slightly behind the i9-14900K
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Intel Core i9-12900K
✓ Pros:
- • Elite multi-core performance for rendering, editing, and streaming
- • Supports both cost-effective DDR4 and high-performance DDR5 motherboards
- • High clock speeds (up to 5.2 GHz) ensure top-tier gaming performance
- • Integrated graphics useful for troubleshooting or Quick Sync workloads
✗ Cons:
- • Very high power consumption (241W) requires premium cooling solutions
- • Runs hotter than competitors under full load
- • LGA1700 platform reaches end-of-life after 14th Gen
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K is the better buy for most people - its 24 cores crush the i9-12900K’s 16 cores.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K if: you want top-tier multitasking performance, you prioritize lower operating temperatures during gaming, or you plan to build a future-proof system with the latest tech.
Choose the Intel Core i9-12900K if: you need exceptional multi-core performance for video editing, you prefer a more established platform with DDR4 support, or you want to save money without sacrificing too much power.
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 285K excels if you value significantly improved power efficiency compared to 14th gen. Intel Core i9-12900K is better if you prioritize elite multi-core performance for rendering, editing, and streaming. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.