Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Motorola razr+ (2024)
The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max is the flagship option here, boasting a 5088mAh battery that lasts up to 39 hours of video playback. In contrast, the Motorola razr+ (2024) offers a lightweight foldable design and a unique 4.0" cover screen. In my testing, the iPhone's peak brightness of 3000 nits makes outdoor visibility unmatched, while the razr+'s 165Hz refresh rate provides buttery-smooth scrolling. If you prioritize advanced photography with its triple 48MP cameras, the iPhone is the clear choice; however, the razr+ excels in portability and ease of use with its innovative design. Key specs: Refresh: 120 Hz vs 165 Hz and Battery: 5088 mAh vs 4000 mAh.
Why compare these? Both the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max and Motorola razr+ (2024) are premium flagship smartphones competing in the same market segment. This makes them direct rivals for buyers looking for premium flagship features and performance in 2026. Understanding their differences helps you choose the right one for your specific needs.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Apple iPhone | Motorola razr+ |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | ✓4.8★ (126 reviews) | 4.3★ (206 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Brightest iPhone display ever (3000 nits peak outdoor) | Largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market |
| Main Drawback | Large and heavy form factor (233 g) | Lacks an ultrawide camera (swapped for telephoto), limiting landscape shots |
| Market Position | Flagship | Flagship |

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
iOS
Minimum 5 years from release date (guaranteed security updates); historically supports 6+ years of OS upgrades
Apple A19 Pro chip (3nm; 6-core CPU: 2 performance + 4 efficiency; 16-core Neural Engine; hardware-accelerated ray tracing)
Apple 6-core GPU with Neural Accelerators (A19 Pro)

Motorola razr+ (2024)
Android
3 years of OS upgrades; 4 years of security updates
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Mobile Platform
Qualcomm Adreno 735
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Motorola razr+ (2024)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max

Motorola razr+ (2024)
| Criterion | Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | Motorola razr+ (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.8(126)Best Buy | ★4.3(206)Best Buy |
Operating System | iOS | Android |
Software Support | Minimum 5 years from release date (guaranteed security updates); historically supports 6+ years of OS upgrades | 3 years of OS upgrades; 4 years of security updates |
Processor | Apple A19 Pro chip (3nm; 6-core CPU: 2 performance + 4 efficiency; 16-core Neural Engine; hardware-accelerated ray tracing) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Mobile Platform |
Graphics | Apple 6-core GPU with Neural Accelerators (A19 Pro) | Qualcomm Adreno 735 |
RAM | 12 GB (LPDDR5X) | 12GB LPDDR5X |
Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB / 2TB (NVMe) | 256GB (UFS 4.0) |
Display Size | 6.9" (6.86" measured diagonally as a standard rectangle; actual viewable area is less) | Main: 6.9" Foldable + Cover: 4.0" |
Screen Type | Super Retina XDR OLED | Main: Foldable LTPO pOLED; Cover: LTPO pOLED |
Resolution | 2868 x 1320 pixels (460 ppi) | Main: 2640 x 1080 pixels (FHD+), 413 ppi; Cover: 1272 x 1080 pixels, 417 ppi |
Refresh Rate | Up to 120 Hz (ProMotion adaptive 1-120Hz) | 165Hz (Main and Cover) |
Peak Brightness | 1000 nits max (typical); 1600 nits peak (HDR); 3000 nits peak (outdoor); 1 nit minimum | 3,000 nits (Peak, Main) / 2,400 nits (Peak, Cover) |
Main Camera | 48MP Fusion Main (24 mm, f/1.78), 2nd-gen sensor-shift optical image stabilization, 100% Focus Pixels, support for 24MP and 48MP super-high-resolution photos | 50MP Wide (f/1.7, 0.8µm), OIS, Instant-all Pixel Focus |
Ultra-Wide Camera | 48MP Fusion Ultra Wide (13 mm, f/2.2, 120° field of view), Hybrid Focus Pixels, 48MP macro photography | N/A (Replaced by Telephoto lens) |
Telephoto Camera | 48MP Fusion Telephoto (100 mm, f/2.8), tetraprism design, 3D sensor-shift OIS, autofocus; enables 12MP optical-quality 8x zoom (200 mm equivalent) | 50MP Telephoto (2x optical, f/2.0), 0.64µm; 2x Optical Zoom |
Optical Zoom | 0.5x, 1x, 2x, 4x, 8x optical-quality zoom steps (16x optical zoom range) | 2x Optical Zoom |
Digital Zoom | Up to 40x | Up to 30x Digital Zoom |
Video Recording | 4K Dolby Vision at 24/25/30/60/100/120 fps (Fusion Main); ProRes up to 4K at 120 fps with external recording; Cinematic mode up to 4K HDR at 30 fps | 4K@60fps, 1080p@60fps; 4K HDR10+@30fps |
Front Camera | 18MP Center Stage (f/1.9), autofocus with Focus Pixels, 4K Dolby Vision at 24/25/30/60 fps | 32MP Front (f/2.4, 0.7µm), Quad Pixel technology |
Battery | 5088 mAh (Li-ion, eSIM model); Up to 39 hours video playback (35 hours streamed) | 4,000 mAh (Non-removable) |
Wired Charging | USB-C; Up to 50% charge in ~20 minutes with 40W adapter or higher | Up to 45W TurboPower (Charger sold separately) |
Wireless Charging | MagSafe up to 25W (with 30W+ adapter); Qi2 up to 25W; Qi up to 7.5W | 15W Wireless Charging; 5W Reverse Charging |
Connectivity | 5G (sub-6 GHz and mmWave) with 4x4 MIMO; Gigabit LTE; Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) with 2x2 MIMO; Bluetooth 6.0; Ultra Wideband (Second-generation); Thread networking technology; NFC with reader mode | 5G (Sub6); Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be); Bluetooth 5.4; NFC; Dual SIM (Nano-SIM + eSIM) |
USB | USB-C connector with USB 3 speeds (up to 10 Gb/s); Native DisplayPort output | USB Type-C 2.0 |
Durability | IP68 (maximum depth of 6 meters up to 30 minutes); Ceramic Shield 2 front; Ceramic Shield back; Aerospace-grade aluminum unibody (with internal vapor chamber) | IPX8 (Water resistant up to 1.5m for 30 min); Gorilla Glass Victus (cover); Vegan leather finish |
Dimensions | 6.43" x 3.07" x 0.34" (163.4 x 78.0 x 8.75 mm) | Unfolded: 6.75" x 2.91" x 0.28" (171.4 x 74.0 x 7.1 mm); Folded: 3.47" x 2.91" x 0.60" (88.1 x 74.0 x 15.3 mm) |
Weight | 8.22 oz (233 g) | 6.67 oz (189 g) |
Biometrics | Face ID | Side-mounted Fingerprint Reader; Face Unlock |
Extras | Apple Intelligence support; Camera Control button; Action button; Dynamic Island; Always-On display; Dual eSIM (US models); Emergency SOS via satellite; Crash Detection; Roadside Assistance via satellite | Moto AI features; Snapdragon Sound; Stereo Speakers with Dolby Atmos |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
iOS
Minimum 5 years from release date (guaranteed security updates); historically supports 6+ years of OS upgrades
Apple A19 Pro chip (3nm; 6-core CPU: 2 performance + 4 efficiency; 16-core Neural Engine; hardware-accelerated ray tracing)
Apple 6-core GPU with Neural Accelerators (A19 Pro)
12 GB (LPDDR5X)
256GB / 512GB / 1TB / 2TB (NVMe)
Pros
- Brightest iPhone display ever (3000 nits peak outdoor)
- Triple 48MP camera system with 8x optical-quality zoom
Cons
- Large and heavy form factor (233 g)
- Fastest charging speeds require purchasing a 40W+ adapter separately

Motorola razr+ (2024)
Android
3 years of OS upgrades; 4 years of security updates
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Mobile Platform
Qualcomm Adreno 735
12GB LPDDR5X
256GB (UFS 4.0)
Pros
- Largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market
- Incredibly smooth 165Hz refresh rate on both inner and outer displays
Cons
- Lacks an ultrawide camera (swapped for telephoto), limiting landscape shots
- USB-C port is limited to slow USB 2.0 speeds
Which one is better?
Grab the Motorola razr+ (2024) if you want a lighter phone with a unique folding design.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max if: you shoot a lot of video, need the best camera performance with triple 48MP lenses, or prefer a brighter screen for outdoor use.
Choose the Motorola razr+ (2024) if: you want a foldable design that's easy to pocket, value a lightweight phone at 6.67oz, or enjoy a high-refresh-rate display for gaming.
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.8★ vs 4.3★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose Apple iPhone
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 206 reviews vs 126
→ Choose Motorola razr+
Brightest iPhone display Priority
Brightest iPhone display ever (3000 nits peak outdoor)
→ Choose Apple iPhone
Largest and most Priority
Largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market
→ Choose Motorola razr+
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Bottom line: The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max edges ahead with a 4.8★ rating compared to 4.3★. However, Motorola razr+ (2024) remains a strong contender if its strengths align better with your needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max or Motorola razr+ (2024)?
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max is the better choice if you prioritize brightest iphone display ever (3000 nits peak outdoor). Motorola razr+ (2024) wins if you value largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market. Both are rated highly (4.8★ vs 4.3★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max and Motorola razr+ (2024)?
Key differences: Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max offers brightest iphone display ever (3000 nits peak outdoor), while Motorola razr+ (2024) stands out with largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market. Consider that Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max large and heavy form factor (233 g). Meanwhile, Motorola razr+ (2024) lacks an ultrawide camera (swapped for telephoto), limiting landscape shots. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 27, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
