Apple iPhone 17 Pro vs Motorola razr (2023)
In the battle of flagship versus mid-range, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro and Motorola razr (2023) have distinct advantages. The iPhone 17 Pro is the premium choice, boasting a stunning 6.3-inch display with a peak brightness of 3000 nits. The decisive factor is performance. The iPhone 17 Pro's A19 Pro chip delivers superior speed and multitasking capabilities compared to the razr's Snapdragon 7 Gen 1. You'll appreciate how the iPhone's 12GB RAM allows for seamless app switching and gaming, while the razr's 8GB RAM is just enough for everyday tasks but can lag during intense usage. Key specs: Display: 6.3" vs 6.9" and Refresh: 120 Hz vs 144 Hz.
Why compare these? The Apple iPhone 17 Pro (premium flagship) and Motorola razr (2023) (mid-range) represent different approaches to smartphones. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Apple iPhone | Motorola razr |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | ✓4.8★ (108 reviews) | 4.3★ (513 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Brightest 6.3-inch display ever (3000 nits peak outdoor) | Most accessible price point for a new foldable phone in the US |
| Main Drawback | Charging requires purchasing a 40W+ adapter separately for max speed | External display (1.5") is tiny and only useful for basic notifications (unlike Razr+) |
| Market Position | ✓Flagship | Mid-range |
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
iOS
Minimum 5 years from release date (guaranteed security updates); historically supports 6+ years of OS upgrades
Apple A19 Pro chip (3nm; 6-core CPU: 2 performance + 4 efficiency; 16-core Neural Engine; hardware-accelerated ray tracing)
Apple 6-core GPU with Neural Accelerators (A19 Pro)
Motorola razr (2023)
Android
3 Android OS upgrades and 4 years of bi-monthly security updates
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)
Adreno 644
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Apple iPhone 17 Pro vs Motorola razr (2023)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Motorola razr (2023)
| Criterion | Apple iPhone 17 Pro | Motorola razr (2023) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.8(108)Best Buy | ★4.3(513)Best Buy |
Operating System | iOS | Android |
Software Support | Minimum 5 years from release date (guaranteed security updates); historically supports 6+ years of OS upgrades | 3 Android OS upgrades and 4 years of bi-monthly security updates |
Processor | Apple A19 Pro chip (3nm; 6-core CPU: 2 performance + 4 efficiency; 16-core Neural Engine; hardware-accelerated ray tracing) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm) |
Graphics | Apple 6-core GPU with Neural Accelerators (A19 Pro) | Adreno 644 |
RAM | 12 GB (LPDDR5X) | 8GB LPDDR4X |
Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB / 2TB (NVMe) | 128GB UFS 2.2 (Non-expandable) |
Display Size | 6.3" (6.27" measured diagonally as a standard rectangle; actual viewable area is less) | Main: 6.9" / External: 1.5" |
Screen Type | Super Retina XDR OLED | Main: FHD+ pOLED, LTPO, 144Hz / External: OLED, 60Hz |
Resolution | 2622 x 1206 pixels (460 ppi) | Main: 2640 x 1080 (413 ppi) / External: 194 x 368 (282 ppi) |
Refresh Rate | Up to 120 Hz (ProMotion adaptive 1-120Hz); Always-On display | Main: Up to 144Hz / External: 60Hz |
Peak Brightness | 1000 nits max (typical); 1600 nits peak (HDR); 3000 nits peak (outdoor); 1 nit minimum | 1,400 nits (Main Peak) / 1,000 nits (External Peak) |
Main Camera | 48MP Fusion Main (24 mm, f/1.6), second-generation sensor-shift optical image stabilization, 100% Focus Pixels, support for super-high-resolution photos (24MP and 48MP) | 64MP, f/1.7, 0.7µm, OIS, Laser AF (Quad Pixel to 16MP) |
Ultra-Wide Camera | 48MP Fusion Ultra Wide (13 mm, f/2.2, 120° field of view), Hybrid Focus Pixels, 48MP macro photography | 13MP, f/2.2, 120-degree FOV, Macro Vision |
Telephoto Camera | 48MP Fusion Telephoto (100 mm, 4x, f/2.8), tetraprism design, 3D sensor-shift OIS, autofocus; enables 12MP optical-quality 8x zoom (200 mm equivalent) | No (Not supported) |
Optical Zoom | 0.5x, 1x, 2x, 4x, 8x optical-quality zoom steps (16x optical zoom range) | No (Not supported) |
Digital Zoom | Up to 40x | Up to 8x |
Video Recording | 4K Dolby Vision at 24/25/30/60/100/120 fps (Fusion Main); ProRes up to 4K at 120 fps with external recording; Cinematic mode up to 4K HDR at 30 fps | 4K UHD @ 30fps; 1080p @ 30/60fps |
Front Camera | 18MP Center Stage (f/1.9), autofocus with Focus Pixels, 4K Dolby Vision at 24/25/30/60 fps | 32MP, f/2.4, 0.7µm (Quad Pixel to 8MP) |
Battery | 4252 mAh (Li-ion, eSIM model); Up to 33 hours video playback (30 hours streamed) | 4,200mAh (Non-removable) |
Wired Charging | USB-C; Up to 50% charge in ~20 minutes with 40W adapter or higher | 30W TurboPower (Charger NOT included in US retail box) |
Wireless Charging | MagSafe up to 25W (with 30W+ adapter); Qi2 up to 25W; Qi up to 7.5W | 5W Wireless Charging |
Connectivity | 5G (sub-6 GHz and mmWave) with 4x4 MIMO; Gigabit LTE; Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) with 2x2 MIMO; Bluetooth 6.0; Ultra Wideband (Second-generation); Thread networking technology; NFC with reader mode | 5G (Sub-6/mmWave - Carrier Dependent), Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC |
USB | USB-C connector with USB 3 speeds (up to 10 Gb/s); Native DisplayPort output | USB Type-C 2.0 |
Durability | IP68 (maximum depth of 6 meters up to 30 minutes); Ceramic Shield 2 front; Ceramic Shield back; Aerospace-grade aluminum unibody (with internal vapor chamber) | IP52 (Water-repellent coating - Splash Resistant only) |
Dimensions | 5.89" x 2.81" x 0.32" (149.6 x 71.5 x 8.25 mm) | Open: 6.73 x 2.91 x 0.29 in (170.8 x 74.0 x 7.35 mm) / Closed: 3.47 x 2.91 x 0.62 in |
Weight | 7.27 oz (206 g) | 6.65 oz (188.6 g) |
Biometrics | Face ID | Side-mounted fingerprint reader, Face Unlock |
Extras | Apple Intelligence support; Camera Control button; Action button; Dynamic Island; Dual eSIM (US models); Emergency SOS via satellite; Crash Detection; Roadside Assistance via satellite | Vegan Leather finish, Stereo Speakers (Dolby Atmos), Ready For (Wireless only) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
iOS
Minimum 5 years from release date (guaranteed security updates); historically supports 6+ years of OS upgrades
Apple A19 Pro chip (3nm; 6-core CPU: 2 performance + 4 efficiency; 16-core Neural Engine; hardware-accelerated ray tracing)
Apple 6-core GPU with Neural Accelerators (A19 Pro)
12 GB (LPDDR5X)
256GB / 512GB / 1TB / 2TB (NVMe)
Pros
- Brightest 6.3-inch display ever (3000 nits peak outdoor)
- Triple 48MP camera system with new 4x tetraprism telephoto
Cons
- Charging requires purchasing a 40W+ adapter separately for max speed
- No physical SIM tray (eSIM only in US models)
Motorola razr (2023)
Android
3 Android OS upgrades and 4 years of bi-monthly security updates
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)
Adreno 644
8GB LPDDR4X
128GB UFS 2.2 (Non-expandable)
Pros
- Most accessible price point for a new foldable phone in the US
- Battery life (4,200mAh) exceeds that of the premium Razr+ and Galaxy Z Flip5
Cons
- External display (1.5") is tiny and only useful for basic notifications (unlike Razr+)
- Charger is NOT included in the box (unlike previous Moto G phones)
Which one is better?
The Apple iPhone 17 Pro is the better buy for most people - its triple 48MP camera system crushes the Motorola razr (2023)'s dual camera setup.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Apple iPhone 17 Pro if: you prioritize top-tier photography with its 48MP cameras, need a powerful device for gaming, or want the brightest display at 3000 nits.
Choose the Motorola razr (2023) if: you want an affordable foldable option, prefer a unique design, or require a phone that lasts up to 42 hours on a single charge.
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.8★ vs 4.3★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose Apple iPhone
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 513 reviews vs 108
→ Choose Motorola razr
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose Apple iPhone
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose Motorola razr
Conclusion
Apple iPhone 17 Pro and Motorola razr (2023) are both solid choices. Match the strengths above to your budget and workflow to make the best call.
Bottom line: The Apple iPhone 17 Pro edges ahead with a 4.8★ rating compared to 4.3★. However, Motorola razr (2023) remains a strong contender if its strengths align better with your needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Apple iPhone 17 Pro or Motorola razr (2023)?
Apple iPhone 17 Pro is the better choice if you prioritize brightest 6.3-inch display ever (3000 nits peak outdoor). Motorola razr (2023) wins if you value most accessible price point for a new foldable phone in the us. Both are rated highly (4.8★ vs 4.3★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Apple iPhone 17 Pro and Motorola razr (2023)?
Key differences: Apple iPhone 17 Pro offers brightest 6.3-inch display ever (3000 nits peak outdoor), while Motorola razr (2023) stands out with most accessible price point for a new foldable phone in the us. Consider that Apple iPhone 17 Pro charging requires purchasing a 40w+ adapter separately for max speed. Meanwhile, Motorola razr (2023) external display (1.5") is tiny and only useful for basic notifications (unlike razr+). Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 27, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.