LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor vs Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor
The LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor takes the lead in immersive gaming with its expansive 34" screen and a stunning WQHD resolution of 3440 x 1440. In contrast, the Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor offers a sharper 4K resolution of 3840 x 2160 but at a smaller size, making it an intriguing option for those who prioritize pixel density. In real-world use, the LG's impressive 160Hz refresh rate provides smoother gameplay compared to Acer's 320Hz at 1080p. However, if you're focused on versatility for gaming and productivity, the Nitro's Dual Mode enables seamless switching between high-res 4K and ultra-fast 1080p, making it a compelling choice for gamers and content creators alike.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor vs Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor
| Criterion | LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor | Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(1,104)Amazon | ★3.8(32)Amazon |
Screen Size | 34" Viewable (34" Class) | 27" (68.6 cm) |
Resolution | 3440 x 1440 (WQHD) | 3840 x 2160 (4K UHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 21:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | VA (Vertical Alignment) | IPS (Mini-LED backlight) |
Refresh Rate | 160 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 100 Hz (via HDMI) | 160 Hz (4K); 320 Hz (1080p via DFR Dual Mode) |
Response Time | 5 ms (GtG Faster) / 1 ms (MBR) | 1 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 300 nits (Typical) / 240 nits (Min) | 600 cd/m² (Typical); 1000 cd/m² (HDR Peak) |
Contrast | 3,000:1 (Typical) | 1,000:1 (Native); 100,000,000:1 (ACM Dynamic) |
Color Gamut | 99% sRGB (CIE1931) | 99% AdobeRGB; 95% DCI-P3 |
Color Depth | 1.07 Billion (10-bit) | 10-bit (8-bit + FRC) |
HDR | HDR10 | VESA DisplayHDR 1000 (HDR10) |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync Premium | AMD FreeSync Premium |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | 1800R | No (Flat panel) |
Speakers | No (None) | Yes (2x 3W) |
Ports | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out | 2x HDMI 2.1; 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x USB-C (DP Alt Mode, 90W PD); 2x USB-A 3.0 (Downstream); 1x USB-B (Upstream); 1x 3.5mm Audio Out |
USB C | No | Yes (DP Alt Mode, Data, 90W Power Delivery) |
Kvm | No | Yes (Built-in KVM switch) |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 75 x 75 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 15°) | Tilt (-5° to 25°); Swivel (±25°); Height adj. (150 mm); Pivot (±90°) |
Power Consumption | 42 W (Typical) / 45 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Sleep) | 35 W (Standard); 230 W (Max with USB-C charging) |
Weight With Stand | 6,800 g (14.99 lbs) | 6,720 g (14.82 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • Expansive 21:9 WQHD resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9
- • High 160Hz refresh rate (via DisplayPort) delivers fluid motion for gaming
- • VA panel provides deep blacks with a high 3,000:1 contrast ratio
- • Supports AMD FreeSync Premium for tear-free gameplay
- • 1ms Motion Blur Reduction (MBR) mode improves clarity in fast-paced scenes
✗ Cons:
- • Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments
- • HDMI ports are version 2.0, limiting refresh rate to 100Hz at native resolution
- • No built-in speakers or USB connectivity
- • Response time (5ms GtG) can cause black smearing typical of VA panels
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • Innovative Dual Mode: Switch between high-res 4K 160Hz or ultra-fast 1080p 320Hz
- • Mini-LED backlight with 576 local dimming zones delivers deep blacks and high brightness
- • Full-featured USB-C hub with 90W Power Delivery and built-in KVM switch
- • Excellent color accuracy covering 99% AdobeRGB, suitable for content creation
- • Fully adjustable ergonomic stand with portrait mode (pivot) support
✗ Cons:
- • OSD menu navigation can be clunky compared to competitors
- • Local dimming (576 zones) may show slight blooming compared to higher-tier 1000+ zone panels
- • Stand has a wide footprint, requiring significant desk depth
- • Viewing angles, while good, are slightly narrower than standard IPS due to the Mini-LED layer
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor is the better buy for most people - its expansive 34" screen with 3440 x 1440 resolution crushes the Acer Nitro XV275K P5's smaller display.
Who should buy each?
Choose the LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor if: you want a massive screen for immersive gaming, enjoy multitasking with extra screen real estate, or play fast-paced games that benefit from a high refresh rate. (34" display, 160 Hz refresh)
Choose the Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor if: you need a compact monitor with stunning 4K visuals, want flexibility for both gaming and content creation, or prefer a monitor with built-in speakers and USB-C connectivity.
Conclusion
There is no wrong answer here. Focus on the features you will use daily and pick the model that aligns with them.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor excels if you value expansive 21:9 wqhd resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9. Acer Nitro XV275K P5 27" 4K Mini-LED Dual-Mode Gaming Monitor is better if you prioritize innovative dual mode: switch between high-res 4k 160hz or ultra-fast 1080p 320hz. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.