LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor vs ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor
The LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor is the mid-range option here, while the ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor is budget-friendly. If you're gaming or multitasking, the LG's impressive 3440 x 1440 resolution and 160Hz refresh rate deliver a much smoother experience than the ARZOPA's 1920 x 1080 at 60Hz. In real-world use, this means the LG monitor offers 33% more screen space, making it ideal for productivity and immersive gaming. The trade-off? The ARZOPA is ultra-light at just 1.6 lbs, perfect for on-the-go setups, but its limited brightness and color quality fall short for serious viewing or editing tasks. Key specs: Display: 34" vs 15.6" and Refresh: 160 Hz vs 60 Hz.
Why compare these? The LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor (mid-range) and ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor (budget-friendly) represent different approaches to monitors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | LG 34WP60C-B | ARZOPA A1 |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | ✓4.6★ (1,104 reviews) | 4.4★ (14,391 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Expansive 21:9 WQHD resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9 | Ultra-lightweight design (1.6 lbs) makes it ideal for travel |
| Main Drawback | Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments | Limited color gamut (45% NTSC) makes colors look washed out; not suitable for photo editing |
| Market Position | ✓Mid-range | Budget |

LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
34" Viewable (34" Class)
3440 x 1440 (WQHD)
21:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)

ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor
15.6" (39.6 cm)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor vs ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor

LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor

ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor
| Criterion | LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor | ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(1,104)Amazon | ★4.4(14,391)Amazon |
Screen Size | 34" Viewable (34" Class) | 15.6" (39.6 cm) |
Resolution | 3440 x 1440 (WQHD) | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 21:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | VA (Vertical Alignment) | IPS |
Refresh Rate | 160 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 100 Hz (via HDMI) | 60 Hz |
Response Time | 5 ms (GtG Faster) / 1 ms (MBR) | N/A (Not specified) |
Brightness | 300 nits (Typical) / 240 nits (Min) | 300 cd/m² (Typical) |
Contrast | 3,000:1 (Typical) | 1,200:1 (Static) |
Color Gamut | 99% sRGB (CIE1931) | 45% NTSC (approx. 65% sRGB) |
Color Depth | 1.07 Billion (10-bit) | 6-bit (262K colors) |
HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 (Signal support only) |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync Premium | No (Not supported) |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | 1800R | No (Flat panel) |
Speakers | No (None) | Yes (2x 1W) |
Ports | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out | 1x Mini HDMI; 2x USB-C (Full Function: DP Alt Mode + Power Delivery); 1x 3.5mm Audio Out |
USB C | No | Yes (2x USB-C with Pass-Through Charging support) |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | No (Not supported) |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 15°) | Built-in adjustable kickstand (0° to 90° tilt) |
Power Consumption | 42 W (Typical) / 45 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Sleep) | 8 W (Max); Requires 5V/2.4A source |
Weight With Stand | 6,800 g (14.99 lbs) | 725 g (1.6 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
34" Viewable (34" Class)
3440 x 1440 (WQHD)
21:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
160 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 100 Hz (via HDMI)
5 ms (GtG Faster) / 1 ms (MBR)
Pros
- Expansive 21:9 WQHD resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9
- High 160Hz refresh rate (via DisplayPort) delivers fluid motion for gaming
Cons
- Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments
- HDMI ports are version 2.0, limiting refresh rate to 100Hz at native resolution

ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor
15.6" (39.6 cm)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS
60 Hz
N/A (Not specified)
Pros
- Ultra-lightweight design (1.6 lbs) makes it ideal for travel
- Plug-and-play single cable connection via USB-C for compatible laptops
Cons
- Limited color gamut (45% NTSC) makes colors look washed out; not suitable for photo editing
- No VESA mounting holes limits installation options
Which one is better?
The LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 3440 x 1440 resolution crushes the ARZOPA's 1920 x 1080. That said, grab the ARZOPA A1 if you need a lightweight portable monitor - it's lighter and ideal for travel.
Who should buy each?
Choose the LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor if: you game regularly and want smooth visuals, you multitask with multiple windows open, or you need a high-resolution display for photo editing. (34" display, 160 Hz refresh)
Choose the ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor if: you travel often and need a monitor, you want a budget-friendly second screen, or you only need basic display functions without color accuracy. (15.6" display, 60 Hz refresh)
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.4★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose LG 34WP60C-B
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 14,391 reviews vs 1,104
→ Choose ARZOPA A1
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose LG 34WP60C-B
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose ARZOPA A1
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Bottom line: The LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor edges ahead with a 4.6★ rating compared to 4.4★. However, ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor remains a strong contender if its strengths align better with your needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor or ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor?
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize expansive 21:9 wqhd resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9. ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor wins if you value ultra-lightweight design (1.6 lbs) makes it ideal for travel. Both are rated highly (4.6★ vs 4.4★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor and ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor?
Key differences: LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor offers expansive 21:9 wqhd resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9, while ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor stands out with ultra-lightweight design (1.6 lbs) makes it ideal for travel. Consider that LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments. Meanwhile, ARZOPA A1 15.6" FHD Portable Monitor limited color gamut (45% ntsc) makes colors look washed out; not suitable for photo editing. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
