LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor vs BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
If you're in the market for an impressive monitor, the LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor is the premium option here, boasting a massive 3440 x 1440 resolution compared to the BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor's 1920 x 1080. In real-world use, that means 33% more screen space, perfect for multitasking or immersive gaming experiences. However, the BenQ GW2480 shines with its eye-care features, including a Brightness Intelligence sensor that automatically adjusts brightness to your environment, which is ideal for long hours of work or study. But keep in mind, the LG's 160Hz refresh rate gives it a serious edge for gaming, making motion look incredibly smooth compared to the BenQ's 60Hz limit. Key specs: Display: 34" vs 23.8" and Refresh: 160 Hz vs 60 Hz.
Why compare these? The LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor (mid-range) and BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor (budget-friendly) represent different approaches to monitors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | LG 34WP60C-B | BenQ GW2480 |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.6★ (1,104 reviews) | 4.6★ (19,967 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Expansive 21:9 WQHD resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9 | Exclusive 'Brightness Intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light |
| Main Drawback | Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments | Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not suitable for gaming) |
| Market Position | ✓Mid-range | Budget |
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
34" Viewable (34" Class)
3440 x 1440 (WQHD)
21:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor vs BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
| Criterion | LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor | BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(1,104)Amazon | ★4.6(19,967)Amazon |
Screen Size | 34" Viewable (34" Class) | 23.8" Viewable (24" Class) |
Resolution | 3440 x 1440 (WQHD) | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 21:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | VA (Vertical Alignment) | IPS (In-Plane Switching) |
Refresh Rate | 160 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 100 Hz (via HDMI) | 60 Hz |
Response Time | 5 ms (GtG Faster) / 1 ms (MBR) | 5 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 300 nits (Typical) / 240 nits (Min) | 250 nits (Typical) |
Contrast | 3,000:1 (Typical) | 1,000:1 (Native) / 20,000,000:1 (Dynamic) |
Color Gamut | 99% sRGB (CIE1931) | 72% NTSC (Approx. 100% sRGB) |
Color Depth | 1.07 Billion (10-bit) | 16.7M (8-bit) |
HDR | HDR10 | No (Not supported) |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync Premium | No (Not supported) |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | 1800R | Flat |
Speakers | No (None) | 2x 1 W (Stereo) |
Ports | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out | 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x VGA; 1x 3.5mm Audio In; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 15°) | Tilt only (-5° to 20°) |
Power Consumption | 42 W (Typical) / 45 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Sleep) | 16 W (Energy Star) / 27 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) |
Weight With Stand | 6,800 g (14.99 lbs) | 3,840 g (8.47 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
34" Viewable (34" Class)
3440 x 1440 (WQHD)
21:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
160 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 100 Hz (via HDMI)
5 ms (GtG Faster) / 1 ms (MBR)
Pros
- Expansive 21:9 WQHD resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9
- High 160Hz refresh rate (via DisplayPort) delivers fluid motion for gaming
Cons
- Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments
- HDMI ports are version 2.0, limiting refresh rate to 100Hz at native resolution
BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor
23.8" Viewable (24" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
IPS (In-Plane Switching)
60 Hz
5 ms (GtG)
Pros
- Exclusive 'Brightness Intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light
- Flicker-Free and Low Blue Light technologies are certified by TÜV Rheinland
Cons
- Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not suitable for gaming)
- Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments
Which one is better?
The LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 3440 x 1440 resolution crushes the BenQ's 1920 x 1080.
Who should buy each?
Choose the LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor if: you game frequently and need a high refresh rate, you want more screen real estate for productivity, or you enjoy watching movies in high resolution. (34" display, 160 Hz refresh)
Choose the BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor if: you spend long hours in front of the screen and need eye comfort, you want a budget-friendly option, or you prefer a compact monitor for limited desk space. (23.8" display, 60 Hz refresh)
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 19,967 reviews vs 1,104
→ Choose BenQ GW2480
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose LG 34WP60C-B
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose BenQ GW2480
Expansive 21:9 WQHD Priority
Expansive 21:9 WQHD resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9
→ Choose LG 34WP60C-B
Conclusion
There is no wrong answer here. Focus on the features you will use daily and pick the model that aligns with them.
Bottom line: Both products share a 4.6★ rating, making this comparison particularly close. Your decision should come down to which specific features matter most to you.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor or BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor?
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize expansive 21:9 wqhd resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9. BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor wins if you value exclusive 'brightness intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light. Both are rated highly (4.6★ vs 4.6★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor and BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor?
Key differences: LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor offers expansive 21:9 wqhd resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9, while BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor stands out with exclusive 'brightness intelligence' sensor automatically adjusts screen brightness to ambient light. Consider that LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments. Meanwhile, BenQ GW2480 23.8" FHD IPS Eye-Care Monitor limited to 60hz refresh rate (not suitable for gaming). Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.