LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor vs HP 24mh 23.8" FHD IPS Monitor
Choosing between LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor and HP 24mh 23.8" FHD IPS Monitor can be tricky. Both are excellent, but they serve different priorities. This guide highlights what matters for US shoppers.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor

HP 24mh 23.8" FHD IPS Monitor
Comparison: LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor vs HP 24mh 23.8" FHD IPS Monitor

LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor

HP 24mh 23.8" FHD IPS Monitor
| Criterion | LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor | HP 24mh 23.8" FHD IPS Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(1,104)Amazon | ★4.6(49,272)Amazon |
Screen Size | 34" Viewable (34" Class) | 23.8" Viewable |
Resolution | 3440 x 1440 (WQHD) | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 21:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | VA (Vertical Alignment) | IPS (In-Plane Switching) |
Refresh Rate | 160 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 100 Hz (via HDMI) | 75 Hz (via HDMI/DisplayPort) |
Response Time | 5 ms (GtG Faster) / 1 ms (MBR) | 5 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 300 nits (Typical) / 240 nits (Min) | 250 nits (cd/m²) |
Contrast | 3,000:1 (Typical) | 1,000:1 (Static); 10,000,000:1 (Dynamic) |
Color Gamut | 99% sRGB (CIE1931) | 72% NTSC (Approx. 99% sRGB) |
Color Depth | 1.07 Billion (10-bit) | 8-bit (6-bit + FRC) |
HDR | HDR10 | No (Not supported) |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync Premium | No (Not supported) |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | 1800R | Flat |
Speakers | No (None) | 2x 2 W (Stereo) |
Ports | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out | 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x DisplayPort 1.2; 1x VGA; 1x 3.5mm Audio In |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 100 x 100 mm (Compatible) |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 15°) | Height (100mm), Tilt (-5° to +23°), Pivot (±90°), Swivel (±360°) |
Power Consumption | 42 W (Typical) / 45 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Sleep) | 22 W (Typical) / 24 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) |
Weight With Stand | 6,800 g (14.99 lbs) | 4,500 g (9.92 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • Expansive 21:9 WQHD resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9
- • High 160Hz refresh rate (via DisplayPort) delivers fluid motion for gaming
- • VA panel provides deep blacks with a high 3,000:1 contrast ratio
- • Supports AMD FreeSync Premium for tear-free gameplay
- • 1ms Motion Blur Reduction (MBR) mode improves clarity in fast-paced scenes
✗ Cons:
- • Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments
- • HDMI ports are version 2.0, limiting refresh rate to 100Hz at native resolution
- • No built-in speakers or USB connectivity
- • Response time (5ms GtG) can cause black smearing typical of VA panels
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

HP 24mh 23.8" FHD IPS Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • Exceptional ergonomics for a budget monitor: Height, Tilt, Swivel, and Pivot support
- • IPS panel delivers vivid colors with ~99% sRGB coverage and wide viewing angles
- • 75Hz refresh rate provides slightly smoother motion than standard 60Hz panels
- • Includes DisplayPort 1.2, often missing in this price range, alongside HDMI and VGA
- • Built-in 2W speakers save desk space for basic audio needs
✗ Cons:
- • Lacks FreeSync/Adaptive Sync support for gaming
- • No USB-C port or USB hub for peripheral connectivity
- • Brightness is standard (250 nits), which may struggle in very bright rooms
- • Audio quality from built-in speakers is basic and lacks bass
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor is stronger in specific features, but HP 24mh 23.8" FHD IPS Monitor could still be the better pick if you value its unique advantages.
Who should buy each?
Choose LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor if:
- You want Expansive 21:9 WQHD resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9, High 160Hz refresh rate (via DisplayPort) delivers fluid motion for gaming
- Rating: 4.6★ (1104 reviews)
Choose HP 24mh 23.8" FHD IPS Monitor if:
- You prefer Exceptional ergonomics for a budget monitor: Height, Tilt, Swivel, and Pivot support, IPS panel delivers vivid colors with ~99% sRGB coverage and wide viewing angles
- Rating: 4.6★ (49272 reviews)
Conclusion
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor and HP 24mh 23.8" FHD IPS Monitor are both solid choices. Match the strengths above to your budget and workflow to make the best call.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor excels if you value expansive 21:9 wqhd resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9. HP 24mh 23.8" FHD IPS Monitor is better if you prioritize exceptional ergonomics for a budget monitor: height, tilt, swivel, and pivot support. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
