LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor vs Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor
Choosing between LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor and Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor can be tricky. Both are excellent, but they serve different priorities. This guide highlights what matters for US shoppers.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor
Comparison: LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor vs Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor
| Criterion | LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor | Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(1,104)Amazon | ★4.6(24,344)Amazon |
Screen Size | 34" Viewable (34" Class) | 23.6" Viewable (24" Class) |
Resolution | 3440 x 1440 (WQHD) | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 21:9 | 16:9 |
Screen Type | VA (Vertical Alignment) | VA (Vertical Alignment) |
Refresh Rate | 160 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 100 Hz (via HDMI) | 75 Hz |
Response Time | 5 ms (GtG Faster) / 1 ms (MBR) | 8 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 300 nits (Typical) / 240 nits (Min) | 250 nits (cd/m²) |
Contrast | 3,000:1 (Typical) | 3,000:1 (Static) |
Color Gamut | 99% sRGB (CIE1931) | 85% sRGB / 70% DCI-P3 |
Color Depth | 1.07 Billion (10-bit) | 16.7M (8-bit) |
HDR | HDR10 | No (Not supported) |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync Premium | No (Not supported on 'RN' model) |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | 1800R | 1800R |
Speakers | No (None) | 2x 2 W (4Ω) |
Ports | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out | 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x VGA; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out; 1x 3.5mm Audio In |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 100 x 100 mm | 75 x 75 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-5° to 15°) | Tilt only (-5° to 15°) |
Power Consumption | 42 W (Typical) / 45 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Sleep) | 23 W (Typical) / 29 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Standby) |
Weight With Stand | 6,800 g (14.99 lbs) | 2,998 g (6.61 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • Expansive 21:9 WQHD resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9
- • High 160Hz refresh rate (via DisplayPort) delivers fluid motion for gaming
- • VA panel provides deep blacks with a high 3,000:1 contrast ratio
- • Supports AMD FreeSync Premium for tear-free gameplay
- • 1ms Motion Blur Reduction (MBR) mode improves clarity in fast-paced scenes
✗ Cons:
- • Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments
- • HDMI ports are version 2.0, limiting refresh rate to 100Hz at native resolution
- • No built-in speakers or USB connectivity
- • Response time (5ms GtG) can cause black smearing typical of VA panels
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor
✓ Pros:
- • High static contrast ratio (3,000:1) delivers deep blacks typical of VA panels
- • 1800R curvature adds a layer of immersion to the 24-inch viewing experience
- • 75Hz refresh rate offers smoother motion than standard 60Hz office displays
- • Includes both HDMI and legacy VGA ports for broad device compatibility
- • VESA 75x75mm compatible for mounting on monitor arms or walls
✗ Cons:
- • Slow 8ms response time can cause noticeable ghosting in fast-paced games
- • Lacks Adaptive Sync / FreeSync support (unlike the 'RNR' variant)
- • Color gamut (85% sRGB) is narrower than IPS competitors, leading to less vibrant colors
- • Stand offers only basic tilt adjustment with no height or swivel options
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor is stronger in specific features, but Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor could still be the better pick if you value its unique advantages.
Who should buy each?
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor excels at: Expansive 21:9 WQHD resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9, High 160Hz refresh rate (via DisplayPort) delivers fluid motion for gaming
Watch for: Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments
Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor excels at: High static contrast ratio (3,000:1) delivers deep blacks typical of VA panels, 1800R curvature adds a layer of immersion to the 24-inch viewing experience
Watch for: Slow 8ms response time can cause noticeable ghosting in fast-paced games
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor excels if you value expansive 21:9 wqhd resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9. Sceptre C248W-1920RN 23.6" Curved FHD 75Hz Monitor is better if you prioritize high static contrast ratio (3,000:1) delivers deep blacks typical of va panels. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.