Marshall Major V vs Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones
If you're looking for headphones that can keep up with your busy lifestyle, the Marshall Major V is the premium option here with an impressive 100+ hours of battery life. In real-world use, that means you can listen for days without reaching for a charger. On the flip side, the Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones, while offering a solid 50-hour playtime, introduces lossless audio via USB-C, which is a game-changer for audiophiles. The decision often boils down to how much you value endurance versus sound quality. With 100+ hours, the Major V is perfect for long trips or daily use without the hassle of frequent charging. However, if you prioritize audio fidelity and seamless compatibility with your devices, the Beats Solo 4 could be worth considering despite its shorter battery life and lack of ANC features. Key specs: Weight: 6.56 oz vs 7.65 oz and Battery Life: 100+ hours vs 50 hours.
Why compare these? Both the Marshall Major V and Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones are mid-range headphones competing in the same market segment. This makes them direct rivals for buyers looking for mid-range features and performance in 2026. Understanding their differences helps you choose the right one for your specific needs.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Marshall Major | Beats Solo |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.6★ (2,767 reviews) | 4.6★ (23,077 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Industry-leading 100+ hours of battery life eliminates frequent charging anxiety | Exceptional 50-hour battery life with Fast Fuel charging |
| Main Drawback | On-ear design presses against the ears, which can cause fatigue during long sessions | No Active Noise Cancelling (ANC) |
| Market Position | Mid-range | Mid-range |
Marshall Major V
On-ear (closed-back)
Bluetooth 5.3 + 3.5mm Wired
Bluetooth 5.3 (LE Audio Ready)
SBC, AAC, LC3
Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones
On-ear
Class 1 Bluetooth 5.3; USB-C audio (lossless); 3.5 mm analog input
5.3
SBC, AAC
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Marshall Major V vs Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones
Marshall Major V
Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones
| Criterion | Marshall Major V | Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(2,767)Amazon | ★4.6(23,077)Amazon |
Form Factor | On-ear (closed-back) | On-ear |
Connectivity | Bluetooth 5.3 + 3.5mm Wired | Class 1 Bluetooth 5.3; USB-C audio (lossless); 3.5 mm analog input |
Bluetooth Version | Bluetooth 5.3 (LE Audio Ready) | 5.3 |
Codecs | SBC, AAC, LC3 | SBC, AAC |
ANC | No (Passive noise isolation only) | No (Passive noise isolation only) |
Transparency | No (Not supported) | No (Not supported) |
Drivers | 40mm Dynamic Drivers (Custom-tuned) | 40 mm custom-built transducers |
Frequency Response | 20 Hz – 20,000 Hz | N/A (Manufacturer does not publish) |
Microphones | Built-in microphone for calls (Wind noise reduction) | Digital beam-forming microphones with voice-targeting algorithm |
Battery Life | 100+ hours | Up to 50 hours |
Battery Life | N/A (No charging case) | N/A (Headphones only) |
Charging | USB-C Fast Charge (15 min = 15 hrs); Wireless Charging (pad not included) | USB-C (Fast Fuel: 10 min charge = up to 5 hours playback) |
Multipoint | Yes (Bluetooth Multipoint supported) | No (No simultaneous multi-device connection) |
Low Latency Mode | No (Standard latency; LE Audio ready for future improvements) | No (Standard Bluetooth latency) |
Wired Mode | Yes (3.5mm coiled cable included) | Yes (USB-C for lossless audio; 3.5 mm analog available without battery power) |
Water Resistance | No (No IP rating) | No (No IP rating) |
Weight | 6.56 oz (186 g) | 217 g (7.65 oz) |
Controls | Multi-directional Control Knob (Play/Pause, Volume, Skip) + Customizable M-Button | Physical 'b' button (play/pause, calls, voice assistant), volume rocker |
App Eq | Marshall Bluetooth App (5-band EQ, Battery Preservation settings) | No (No in-app EQ customization) |
Extras | Wireless charging support; Made from 86% recycled plastic; Foldable clip design | Personalized Spatial Audio with Dynamic Head Tracking; Built-in DAC; Audio Sharing (iOS); Find My (iOS) / Find My Device (Android); Foldable design |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Marshall Major V
On-ear (closed-back)
Bluetooth 5.3 + 3.5mm Wired
Bluetooth 5.3 (LE Audio Ready)
SBC, AAC, LC3
No (Passive noise isolation only)
No (Not supported)
Pros
- Industry-leading 100+ hours of battery life eliminates frequent charging anxiety
- Wireless charging capability is a unique convenience in the on-ear category
Cons
- On-ear design presses against the ears, which can cause fatigue during long sessions
- Lacks Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) found in similarly priced competitors
Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones
On-ear
Class 1 Bluetooth 5.3; USB-C audio (lossless); 3.5 mm analog input
5.3
SBC, AAC
No (Passive noise isolation only)
No (Not supported)
Pros
- Exceptional 50-hour battery life with Fast Fuel charging
- Native lossless audio support via USB-C (built-in DAC)
Cons
- No Active Noise Cancelling (ANC)
- No Transparency / Ambient mode
Which one is better?
The Marshall Major V is the better buy for most people - its 100+ hours of battery life crushes the Beats Solo 4's 50 hours. That said, grab the Beats if you need lighter headphones or desire lossless audio support - it's heavier but offers unique features for audio enthusiasts.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Marshall Major V if: you need 100+ hours of battery life for long trips, prefer wireless charging for convenience, or want customizable controls for quick access.
Choose the Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones if: you want similar-weight headphones for comfort during extended listening, need lossless audio support for high-quality sound, or use Apple devices and appreciate smooth integration. (7.65 oz weight)
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 23,077 reviews vs 2,767
→ Choose Beats Solo
Industry-leading 100+ hours Priority
Industry-leading 100+ hours of battery life eliminates frequent charging anxiety
→ Choose Marshall Major
Exceptional 50-hour battery Priority
Exceptional 50-hour battery life with Fast Fuel charging
→ Choose Beats Solo
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Bottom line: Both products share a 4.6★ rating, making this comparison particularly close. Your decision should come down to which specific features matter most to you.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Marshall Major V or Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones?
Marshall Major V is the better choice if you prioritize industry-leading 100+ hours of battery life eliminates frequent charging anxiety. Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones wins if you value exceptional 50-hour battery life with fast fuel charging. Both are rated highly (4.6★ vs 4.6★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Marshall Major V and Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones?
Key differences: Marshall Major V offers industry-leading 100+ hours of battery life eliminates frequent charging anxiety, while Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones stands out with exceptional 50-hour battery life with fast fuel charging. Consider that Marshall Major V on-ear design presses against the ears, which can cause fatigue during long sessions. Meanwhile, Beats Solo 4 Wireless On-Ear Headphones no active noise cancelling (anc). Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: February 6, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.