← Back to Smartphones
2026 comparison
Updated Jan 27, 2026
|Sources: Amazon, Manufacturer

Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) vs Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro

If you need a reliable phone for long trips or just want to save money, the Motorola is definitely worth considering. Key specs: Display: 6.7" vs 6.6" and Battery: 5000 mAh vs 4050 mAh.

Why compare these? The Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) (budget-friendly) and Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro (mid-range) represent different approaches to smartphones. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.

📱 Display: 6.7" vs 6.6"🔋 Battery: 5000 mAh vs 4050 mAh⚖️ Weight: 7.09 oz vs 8.29 oz

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Key Differences at a Glance

AspectMotorola MotoSamsung Galaxy
User Rating4.3★ (4,258 reviews)3.9★ (215 reviews)
Top StrengthRare wireless charging (15W) support in the budget categoryUser-removable battery is a rare and critical feature for field work
Main DrawbackDisplay is dim (~500 nits) compared to OLED competitorsDisplay brightness (~500 nits) is low for outdoor use compared to S-series
Market PositionBudgetMid-range
Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)

Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)

4.3
(4,258)Amazon
Operating System

Android

Software Support

1 Android OS upgrade (to Android 15) and 3 years of security updates

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm octa-core)

Graphics

IMG BXM-8-256

See Today's Price
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro

Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro

3.9
(215)Amazon
Operating System

Android

Software Support

4 years of OS upgrades and 5 years of security updates (Enterprise Edition standard)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm)

Graphics

Adreno 642L

See Today's Price
Key spec differences

Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.

Display2 specs
Display SizeKey
Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)
6.7"
Winner
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
6.6"
Refresh Rate
Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)
120Hz (Adaptive)
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
120Hz
Performance3 specs
ProcessorKey
Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)
MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm octa-core)
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm)
RAMKey
Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)
8GB (Plus up to 8GB RAM Boost)
Winner
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
6GB
Storage
Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)
128GB UFS 2.2 (Expandable via microSDXC up to 1TB)
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
128GB (Expandable via microSDXC up to 1TB)
Camera2 specs
Main CameraKey
Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)
50MP, f/1.8, OIS, Quad Pixel Technology
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
50MP, f/1.8, PDAF, Dual-LED Flash
Ultra-Wide Camera
Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)
8MP, f/2.2, 118-degree FOV (Doubles as Macro Vision)
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
8MP, f/2.2, 123-degree FOV
Battery2 specs
Battery CapacityKey
Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)
5,000mAh
Winner
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
4,050mAh (User-Removable)
Wireless Charging
Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)
15W Qi Wireless Charging
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
No (Standard Qi not supported; POGO charging cradles used instead)
Design2 specs
Weight
Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)
7.09 oz (201 g)
Winner
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
8.29 oz (235 g)
Dimensions
Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)
6.58 x 3.01 x 0.33 in (167.2 x 76.4 x 8.5 mm)
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 in (168.8 x 79.9 x 9.9 mm)
Connectivity1 specs
Connectivity
Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)
5G (Sub-6), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Bluetooth 5.3, NFC
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
5G (Sub-6), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Bluetooth 5.2, NFC, PTT (Push-to-Talk)
+

Full specs, pros, and cons

Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.

Comparison: Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) vs Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro

Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)

Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)

4.3(4,258)Amazon
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro

Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro

3.9(215)Amazon
Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)

Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)

4.3(4,258)Amazon
Operating System

Android

Software Support

1 Android OS upgrade (to Android 15) and 3 years of security updates

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm octa-core)

Graphics

IMG BXM-8-256

RAM

8GB (Plus up to 8GB RAM Boost)

Storage

128GB UFS 2.2 (Expandable via microSDXC up to 1TB)

Pros

  • Rare wireless charging (15W) support in the budget category
  • Fast 30W wired charging outpaces many competitors (Samsung A15 is 25W)

Cons

  • Display is dim (~500 nits) compared to OLED competitors
  • Video recording limited to 1080p (No 4K support)
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro

Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro

3.9(215)Amazon
Operating System

Android

Software Support

4 years of OS upgrades and 5 years of security updates (Enterprise Edition standard)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm)

Graphics

Adreno 642L

RAM

6GB

Storage

128GB (Expandable via microSDXC up to 1TB)

Pros

  • User-removable battery is a rare and critical feature for field work
  • Rugged build (IP68/MIL-STD-810H) survives drops without a case

Cons

  • Display brightness (~500 nits) is low for outdoor use compared to S-series
  • No standard Qi wireless charging (requires proprietary POGO docks)

Which one is better?

Key specs: Display: 6.7" vs 6.6" and Battery: 5000 mAh vs 4050 mAh.

Who should buy each?

Choose the Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) if: you want a long-lasting battery for extended use, you prefer fast wired charging at 30W, or you want a premium design with vegan leather.
Choose the Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro if: you need a rugged phone for outdoor work, you value a user-removable battery for easy swaps, or you require features like Push-to-Talk functionality. (6.6" display, 4050 mAh battery)

A

Quality Seekers

Higher user rating (4.3★ vs 3.9★) indicates better overall satisfaction

→ Choose Motorola Moto

A

Safe Choice Buyers

More widely tested with 4,258 reviews vs 215

→ Choose Motorola Moto

B

Premium Buyers

Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality

→ Choose Samsung Galaxy

A

Value Seekers

Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features

→ Choose Motorola Moto

Conclusion

With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.

Bottom line: The Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) edges ahead with a 4.3★ rating compared to 3.9★. However, Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro remains a strong contender if its strengths align better with your needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

+Which is better: Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) or Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro?

Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) is the better choice if you prioritize rare wireless charging (15w) support in the budget category. Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro wins if you value user-removable battery is a rare and critical feature for field work. Both are rated highly (4.3★ vs 3.9★), so consider your specific needs and budget.

+What are the main differences between Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) and Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro?

Key differences: Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) offers rare wireless charging (15w) support in the budget category, while Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro stands out with user-removable battery is a rare and critical feature for field work. Consider that Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) display is dim (~500 nits) compared to oled competitors. Meanwhile, Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro display brightness (~500 nits) is low for outdoor use compared to s-series. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.

+Where can US buyers get the best price?

For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.

+Is this comparison up to date?

Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 27, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.

Affiliate disclosure

PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.