Motorola razr (2023) vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Choosing between Motorola razr (2023) and Apple iPhone 17 Pro can be tricky. Both are excellent, but they serve different priorities. This guide highlights what matters for US shoppers.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Motorola razr (2023)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Comparison: Motorola razr (2023) vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Motorola razr (2023)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
| Criterion | Motorola razr (2023) | Apple iPhone 17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.3(513)Best Buy | ★4.8(108)Best Buy |
Operating System | Android | iOS |
Software Support | 3 Android OS upgrades and 4 years of bi-monthly security updates | Minimum 5 years from release date (guaranteed security updates); historically supports 6+ years of OS upgrades |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm) | Apple A19 Pro chip (3nm; 6-core CPU: 2 performance + 4 efficiency; 16-core Neural Engine; hardware-accelerated ray tracing) |
Graphics | Adreno 644 | Apple 6-core GPU with Neural Accelerators (A19 Pro) |
RAM | 8GB LPDDR4X | 12 GB (LPDDR5X) |
Storage | 128GB UFS 2.2 (Non-expandable) | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB / 2TB (NVMe) |
Display Size | Main: 6.9" / External: 1.5" | 6.3" (6.27" measured diagonally as a standard rectangle; actual viewable area is less) |
Screen Type | Main: FHD+ pOLED, LTPO, 144Hz / External: OLED, 60Hz | Super Retina XDR OLED |
Resolution | Main: 2640 x 1080 (413 ppi) / External: 194 x 368 (282 ppi) | 2622 x 1206 pixels (460 ppi) |
Refresh Rate | Main: Up to 144Hz / External: 60Hz | Up to 120 Hz (ProMotion adaptive 1-120Hz); Always-On display |
Peak Brightness | 1,400 nits (Main Peak) / 1,000 nits (External Peak) | 1000 nits max (typical); 1600 nits peak (HDR); 3000 nits peak (outdoor); 1 nit minimum |
Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.7, 0.7µm, OIS, Laser AF (Quad Pixel to 16MP) | 48MP Fusion Main (24 mm, f/1.6), second-generation sensor-shift optical image stabilization, 100% Focus Pixels, support for super-high-resolution photos (24MP and 48MP) |
Ultra-Wide Camera | 13MP, f/2.2, 120-degree FOV, Macro Vision | 48MP Fusion Ultra Wide (13 mm, f/2.2, 120° field of view), Hybrid Focus Pixels, 48MP macro photography |
Telephoto Camera | No (Not supported) | 48MP Fusion Telephoto (100 mm, 4x, f/2.8), tetraprism design, 3D sensor-shift OIS, autofocus; enables 12MP optical-quality 8x zoom (200 mm equivalent) |
Optical Zoom | No (Not supported) | 0.5x, 1x, 2x, 4x, 8x optical-quality zoom steps (16x optical zoom range) |
Digital Zoom | Up to 8x | Up to 40x |
Video Recording | 4K UHD @ 30fps; 1080p @ 30/60fps | 4K Dolby Vision at 24/25/30/60/100/120 fps (Fusion Main); ProRes up to 4K at 120 fps with external recording; Cinematic mode up to 4K HDR at 30 fps |
Front Camera | 32MP, f/2.4, 0.7µm (Quad Pixel to 8MP) | 18MP Center Stage (f/1.9), autofocus with Focus Pixels, 4K Dolby Vision at 24/25/30/60 fps |
Battery | 4,200mAh (Non-removable) | 4252 mAh (Li-ion, eSIM model); Up to 33 hours video playback (30 hours streamed) |
Wired Charging | 30W TurboPower (Charger NOT included in US retail box) | USB-C; Up to 50% charge in ~20 minutes with 40W adapter or higher |
Wireless Charging | 5W Wireless Charging | MagSafe up to 25W (with 30W+ adapter); Qi2 up to 25W; Qi up to 7.5W |
Connectivity | 5G (Sub-6/mmWave - Carrier Dependent), Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC | 5G (sub-6 GHz and mmWave) with 4x4 MIMO; Gigabit LTE; Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) with 2x2 MIMO; Bluetooth 6.0; Ultra Wideband (Second-generation); Thread networking technology; NFC with reader mode |
USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB-C connector with USB 3 speeds (up to 10 Gb/s); Native DisplayPort output |
Durability | IP52 (Water-repellent coating - Splash Resistant only) | IP68 (maximum depth of 6 meters up to 30 minutes); Ceramic Shield 2 front; Ceramic Shield back; Aerospace-grade aluminum unibody (with internal vapor chamber) |
Dimensions | Open: 6.73 x 2.91 x 0.29 in (170.8 x 74.0 x 7.35 mm) / Closed: 3.47 x 2.91 x 0.62 in | 5.89" x 2.81" x 0.32" (149.6 x 71.5 x 8.25 mm) |
Weight | 6.65 oz (188.6 g) | 7.27 oz (206 g) |
Biometrics | Side-mounted fingerprint reader, Face Unlock | Face ID |
Extras | Vegan Leather finish, Stereo Speakers (Dolby Atmos), Ready For (Wireless only) | Apple Intelligence support; Camera Control button; Action button; Dynamic Island; Dual eSIM (US models); Emergency SOS via satellite; Crash Detection; Roadside Assistance via satellite |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

Motorola razr (2023)
✓ Pros:
- • Most accessible price point for a new foldable phone in the US
- • Battery life (4,200mAh) exceeds that of the premium Razr+ and Galaxy Z Flip5
- • Premium vegan leather design feels grippy and durable
- • Main screen is excellent: 144Hz LTPO with invisible crease mechanics
- • Includes wireless charging (albeit slow 5W)
✗ Cons:
- • External display (1.5") is tiny and only useful for basic notifications (unlike Razr+)
- • Charger is NOT included in the box (unlike previous Moto G phones)
- • Performance (Snapdragon 7 Gen 1) is mid-range, not flagship level
- • IP52 rating is weak compared to Samsung's IPX8 (submersion protection)
- • USB 2.0 port means slow data transfer and no wired video output
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
✓ Pros:
- • Brightest 6.3-inch display ever (3000 nits peak outdoor)
- • Triple 48MP camera system with new 4x tetraprism telephoto
- • A19 Pro chip with 12GB RAM and vapor chamber cooling
- • Excellent battery life (up to 33 hours video playback)
- • Fast 40W wired charging and 25W wireless charging
✗ Cons:
- • Charging requires purchasing a 40W+ adapter separately for max speed
- • No physical SIM tray (eSIM only in US models)
- • Telephoto aperture (f/2.8) is narrower than the main lens, impacting low-light zoom
- • Heavier than the standard iPhone 17
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
Apple iPhone 17 Pro is stronger in overall satisfaction, but Motorola razr (2023) could still be the better pick if you value its unique advantages.
Who should buy each?
Motorola razr (2023) excels at: Most accessible price point for a new foldable phone in the US, Battery life (4,200mAh) exceeds that of the premium Razr+ and Galaxy Z Flip5
Watch for: External display (1.5") is tiny and only useful for basic notifications (unlike Razr+)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro excels at: Brightest 6.3-inch display ever (3000 nits peak outdoor), Triple 48MP camera system with new 4x tetraprism telephoto
Watch for: Charging requires purchasing a 40W+ adapter separately for max speed
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
Motorola razr (2023) excels if you value most accessible price point for a new foldable phone in the us. Apple iPhone 17 Pro is better if you prioritize brightest 6.3-inch display ever (3000 nits peak outdoor). Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
