Motorola razr+ (2024) vs Apple iPhone 13
Get the Motorola razr+ (2024) unless you want to save money. In real-world use, the razr+ shines with its 165Hz refresh rate, making every swipe feel incredibly smooth, while the iPhone 13's 60Hz can feel sluggish in comparison. If you're into gaming or heavy multitasking, the razr+ delivers a superior experience you won't want to miss.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Motorola razr+ (2024)

Apple iPhone 13
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Motorola razr+ (2024) vs Apple iPhone 13

Motorola razr+ (2024)

Apple iPhone 13
| Criterion | Motorola razr+ (2024) | Apple iPhone 13 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.3(206)Best Buy | ★4.8(818)Best Buy |
Operating System | Android | iOS |
Software Support | 3 years of OS upgrades; 4 years of security updates | Typically 6+ years of OS updates from release (2021) |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Mobile Platform | Apple A15 Bionic (5nm) |
Graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 735 | Apple GPU (4-core graphics) |
RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X | 4GB LPDDR4X |
Storage | 256GB (UFS 4.0) | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB NVMe |
Display Size | Main: 6.9" Foldable + Cover: 4.0" | 6.1" |
Screen Type | Main: Foldable LTPO pOLED; Cover: LTPO pOLED | Super Retina XDR OLED, HDR10, Dolby Vision |
Resolution | Main: 2640 x 1080 pixels (FHD+), 413 ppi; Cover: 1272 x 1080 pixels, 417 ppi | 2532 x 1170 pixels (460 ppi) |
Refresh Rate | 165Hz (Main and Cover) | 60Hz |
Peak Brightness | 3,000 nits (Peak, Main) / 2,400 nits (Peak, Cover) | 800 nits (Typical) / 1,200 nits (HDR Peak) |
Main Camera | 50MP Wide (f/1.7, 0.8µm), OIS, Instant-all Pixel Focus | 12MP Wide, f/1.6, 26mm, 1.7µm, Sensor-shift OIS, Dual Pixel PDAF |
Ultra-Wide Camera | N/A (Replaced by Telephoto lens) | 12MP Ultrawide, f/2.4, 13mm, 120-degree FOV |
Telephoto Camera | 50MP Telephoto (2x optical, f/2.0), 0.64µm; 2x Optical Zoom | No (Not supported) |
Optical Zoom | 2x Optical Zoom | 2x Optical Zoom Out (0.5x to 1x) |
Digital Zoom | Up to 30x Digital Zoom | Up to 5x |
Video Recording | 4K@60fps, 1080p@60fps; 4K HDR10+@30fps | 4K @ 60fps (Dolby Vision HDR supported); Cinematic mode (1080p @ 30fps) |
Front Camera | 32MP Front (f/2.4, 0.7µm), Quad Pixel technology | 12MP TrueDepth, f/2.2, 23mm, SL 3D (Biometrics) |
Battery | 4,000 mAh (Non-removable) | 3,240mAh (approximate) |
Wired Charging | Up to 45W TurboPower (Charger sold separately) | 20W+ Fast Charging (50% in 30 min) via Lightning |
Wireless Charging | 15W Wireless Charging; 5W Reverse Charging | 15W MagSafe Wireless / 7.5W Qi Wireless |
Connectivity | 5G (Sub6); Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be); Bluetooth 5.4; NFC; Dual SIM (Nano-SIM + eSIM) | 5G (Sub-6 GHz & mmWave), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Bluetooth 5.0, NFC, UWB |
USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | Lightning Connector (USB 2.0 speeds) |
Durability | IPX8 (Water resistant up to 1.5m for 30 min); Gorilla Glass Victus (cover); Vegan leather finish | IP68 (Maximum depth of 6 meters up to 30 minutes); Ceramic Shield front |
Dimensions | Unfolded: 6.75" x 2.91" x 0.28" (171.4 x 74.0 x 7.1 mm); Folded: 3.47" x 2.91" x 0.60" (88.1 x 74.0 x 15.3 mm) | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.30 in (146.7 x 71.5 x 7.65 mm) |
Weight | 6.67 oz (189 g) | 6.14 oz (174 g) |
Biometrics | Side-mounted Fingerprint Reader; Face Unlock | Face ID |
Extras | Moto AI features; Snapdragon Sound; Stereo Speakers with Dolby Atmos | MagSafe ecosystem support, Stereo speakers, Dual eSIM support |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

Motorola razr+ (2024)
✓ Pros:
- • Largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market
- • Incredibly smooth 165Hz refresh rate on both inner and outer displays
- • Dedicated 2x optical telephoto lens captures excellent portraits
- • IPX8 rating finally matches Samsung's water resistance standard
- • Premium design with Gorilla Glass Victus and high-quality vegan leather
✗ Cons:
- • Lacks an ultrawide camera (swapped for telephoto), limiting landscape shots
- • USB-C port is limited to slow USB 2.0 speeds
- • Software support (3 OS updates) lags behind Samsung and Google (7 years)
- • Battery life (4,000mAh) is decent but trails non-folding flagships
- • No dust resistance rating (IPX8 is water only)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Apple iPhone 13
✓ Pros:
- • Excellent build quality with Ceramic Shield and IP68 rating
- • Strong battery life for its size (beat many Android competitors at launch)
- • A15 Bionic chip remains highly capable for everyday tasks and gaming
- • High-quality video recording with Dolby Vision HDR
- • Compact and lightweight 6.1-inch form factor
✗ Cons:
- • Stuck on 60Hz refresh rate (Competitors offer 120Hz)
- • Uses proprietary Lightning port instead of universal USB-C
- • Charging speed is relatively slow (Max ~20-23W)
- • No telephoto lens for optical zoom
- • Cinematic Mode video is limited to 1080p (Pro models support 4K)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
Grab the iPhone 13 if you prefer a more compact and lighter device - it's 6.14oz compared to the razr+'s 6.67oz.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Motorola razr+ (2024) if: you want the largest cover screen at 4.0 inches, you need high performance for gaming with a Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chip, or you love taking photos with a 50MP camera.
Choose the Apple iPhone 13 if: you want a compact device at 6.1 inches, you value durability with an IP68 rating for water resistance, or you prefer a longer software support timeline.
Conclusion
There is no wrong answer here. Focus on the features you will use daily and pick the model that aligns with them.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
Motorola razr+ (2024) excels if you value largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market. Apple iPhone 13 is better if you prioritize excellent build quality with ceramic shield and ip68 rating. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
