Motorola razr+ (2024) vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
If you are torn between Motorola razr+ (2024) and Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max, this breakdown is for you. We compare specs, pros, and cons so you can decide confidently.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Motorola razr+ (2024)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Comparison: Motorola razr+ (2024) vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max

Motorola razr+ (2024)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
| Criterion | Motorola razr+ (2024) | Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.3(206)Best Buy | ★4.8(126)Best Buy |
Operating System | Android | iOS |
Software Support | 3 years of OS upgrades; 4 years of security updates | Minimum 5 years from release date (guaranteed security updates); historically supports 6+ years of OS upgrades |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Mobile Platform | Apple A19 Pro chip (3nm; 6-core CPU: 2 performance + 4 efficiency; 16-core Neural Engine; hardware-accelerated ray tracing) |
Graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 735 | Apple 6-core GPU with Neural Accelerators (A19 Pro) |
RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X | 12 GB (LPDDR5X) |
Storage | 256GB (UFS 4.0) | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB / 2TB (NVMe) |
Display Size | Main: 6.9" Foldable + Cover: 4.0" | 6.9" (6.86" measured diagonally as a standard rectangle; actual viewable area is less) |
Screen Type | Main: Foldable LTPO pOLED; Cover: LTPO pOLED | Super Retina XDR OLED |
Resolution | Main: 2640 x 1080 pixels (FHD+), 413 ppi; Cover: 1272 x 1080 pixels, 417 ppi | 2868 x 1320 pixels (460 ppi) |
Refresh Rate | 165Hz (Main and Cover) | Up to 120 Hz (ProMotion adaptive 1-120Hz) |
Peak Brightness | 3,000 nits (Peak, Main) / 2,400 nits (Peak, Cover) | 1000 nits max (typical); 1600 nits peak (HDR); 3000 nits peak (outdoor); 1 nit minimum |
Main Camera | 50MP Wide (f/1.7, 0.8µm), OIS, Instant-all Pixel Focus | 48MP Fusion Main (24 mm, f/1.78), 2nd-gen sensor-shift optical image stabilization, 100% Focus Pixels, support for 24MP and 48MP super-high-resolution photos |
Ultra-Wide Camera | N/A (Replaced by Telephoto lens) | 48MP Fusion Ultra Wide (13 mm, f/2.2, 120° field of view), Hybrid Focus Pixels, 48MP macro photography |
Telephoto Camera | 50MP Telephoto (2x optical, f/2.0), 0.64µm; 2x Optical Zoom | 48MP Fusion Telephoto (100 mm, f/2.8), tetraprism design, 3D sensor-shift OIS, autofocus; enables 12MP optical-quality 8x zoom (200 mm equivalent) |
Optical Zoom | 2x Optical Zoom | 0.5x, 1x, 2x, 4x, 8x optical-quality zoom steps (16x optical zoom range) |
Digital Zoom | Up to 30x Digital Zoom | Up to 40x |
Video Recording | 4K@60fps, 1080p@60fps; 4K HDR10+@30fps | 4K Dolby Vision at 24/25/30/60/100/120 fps (Fusion Main); ProRes up to 4K at 120 fps with external recording; Cinematic mode up to 4K HDR at 30 fps |
Front Camera | 32MP Front (f/2.4, 0.7µm), Quad Pixel technology | 18MP Center Stage (f/1.9), autofocus with Focus Pixels, 4K Dolby Vision at 24/25/30/60 fps |
Battery | 4,000 mAh (Non-removable) | 5088 mAh (Li-ion, eSIM model); Up to 39 hours video playback (35 hours streamed) |
Wired Charging | Up to 45W TurboPower (Charger sold separately) | USB-C; Up to 50% charge in ~20 minutes with 40W adapter or higher |
Wireless Charging | 15W Wireless Charging; 5W Reverse Charging | MagSafe up to 25W (with 30W+ adapter); Qi2 up to 25W; Qi up to 7.5W |
Connectivity | 5G (Sub6); Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be); Bluetooth 5.4; NFC; Dual SIM (Nano-SIM + eSIM) | 5G (sub-6 GHz and mmWave) with 4x4 MIMO; Gigabit LTE; Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) with 2x2 MIMO; Bluetooth 6.0; Ultra Wideband (Second-generation); Thread networking technology; NFC with reader mode |
USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB-C connector with USB 3 speeds (up to 10 Gb/s); Native DisplayPort output |
Durability | IPX8 (Water resistant up to 1.5m for 30 min); Gorilla Glass Victus (cover); Vegan leather finish | IP68 (maximum depth of 6 meters up to 30 minutes); Ceramic Shield 2 front; Ceramic Shield back; Aerospace-grade aluminum unibody (with internal vapor chamber) |
Dimensions | Unfolded: 6.75" x 2.91" x 0.28" (171.4 x 74.0 x 7.1 mm); Folded: 3.47" x 2.91" x 0.60" (88.1 x 74.0 x 15.3 mm) | 6.43" x 3.07" x 0.34" (163.4 x 78.0 x 8.75 mm) |
Weight | 6.67 oz (189 g) | 8.22 oz (233 g) |
Biometrics | Side-mounted Fingerprint Reader; Face Unlock | Face ID |
Extras | Moto AI features; Snapdragon Sound; Stereo Speakers with Dolby Atmos | Apple Intelligence support; Camera Control button; Action button; Dynamic Island; Always-On display; Dual eSIM (US models); Emergency SOS via satellite; Crash Detection; Roadside Assistance via satellite |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

Motorola razr+ (2024)
✓ Pros:
- • Largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market
- • Incredibly smooth 165Hz refresh rate on both inner and outer displays
- • Dedicated 2x optical telephoto lens captures excellent portraits
- • IPX8 rating finally matches Samsung's water resistance standard
- • Premium design with Gorilla Glass Victus and high-quality vegan leather
✗ Cons:
- • Lacks an ultrawide camera (swapped for telephoto), limiting landscape shots
- • USB-C port is limited to slow USB 2.0 speeds
- • Software support (3 OS updates) lags behind Samsung and Google (7 years)
- • Battery life (4,000mAh) is decent but trails non-folding flagships
- • No dust resistance rating (IPX8 is water only)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
✓ Pros:
- • Brightest iPhone display ever (3000 nits peak outdoor)
- • Triple 48MP camera system with 8x optical-quality zoom
- • A19 Pro chip with 12GB RAM and vapor chamber cooling for sustained performance
- • Excellent battery life (up to 39 hours video playback)
- • Faster 40W wired charging and 25W wireless charging
✗ Cons:
- • Large and heavy form factor (233 g)
- • Fastest charging speeds require purchasing a 40W+ adapter separately
- • No physical SIM tray (eSIM only in US)
- • Expensive starting price
- • Camera bump is significantly larger due to new tetraprism lens
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
Looking at user satisfaction (Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max: 4.3★ vs Motorola razr+ (2024): 4.8★), Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max pulls ahead. The gap is small—choose based on the priorities below.
Who should buy each?
For performance and polish: Motorola razr+ (2024) (Largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market, Incredibly smooth 165Hz refresh rate on both inner and outer displays)
For value or versatility: Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Brightest iPhone display ever (3000 nits peak outdoor), Triple 48MP camera system with 8x optical-quality zoom)
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
Motorola razr+ (2024) excels if you value largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market. Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max is better if you prioritize brightest iphone display ever (3000 nits peak outdoor). Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
