Motorola razr+ (2024) vs Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
When comparing the Motorola razr+ (2024) and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, the razr+ stands out as the premium option with a remarkable 6.9" display and a blazing 165Hz refresh rate, making it ideal for gaming and media consumption. In real-world use, that significant refresh rate difference means smoother scrolling and gameplay, particularly beneficial for mobile gamers looking for that edge. This translates to extra hours of use, which is perfect for those who rely on their phones throughout busy days or while traveling. Key specs: Display: 6.9" vs 6.5" and Refresh: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz.
Why compare these? The Motorola razr+ (2024) (premium flagship) and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (budget-friendly) represent different approaches to smartphones. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Motorola razr+ | Samsung Galaxy |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.3★ (206 reviews) | ✓4.6★ (176 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market | Class-leading 120Hz Super AMOLED display (1,000 nits) |
| Main Drawback | Lacks an ultrawide camera (swapped for telephoto), limiting landscape shots | Exynos 1280 performance is average compared to competitors |
| Market Position | ✓Flagship | Budget |
Motorola razr+ (2024)
Android
3 years of OS upgrades; 4 years of security updates
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Mobile Platform
Qualcomm Adreno 735
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Android
4 generations of OS upgrades and 5 years of security updates
Samsung Exynos 1280 (5nm)
Mali-G68
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Motorola razr+ (2024) vs Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Motorola razr+ (2024)
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
| Criterion | Motorola razr+ (2024) | Samsung Galaxy A25 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.3(206)Best Buy | ★4.6(176)Best Buy |
Operating System | Android | Android |
Software Support | 3 years of OS upgrades; 4 years of security updates | 4 generations of OS upgrades and 5 years of security updates |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Mobile Platform | Samsung Exynos 1280 (5nm) |
Graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 735 | Mali-G68 |
RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X | 6GB (Standard US config) |
Storage | 256GB (UFS 4.0) | 128GB (Expandable via microSDXC up to 1TB) |
Display Size | Main: 6.9" Foldable + Cover: 4.0" | 6.5" |
Screen Type | Main: Foldable LTPO pOLED; Cover: LTPO pOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1,000 nits (HBM) |
Resolution | Main: 2640 x 1080 pixels (FHD+), 413 ppi; Cover: 1272 x 1080 pixels, 417 ppi | 2340 x 1080 (FHD+) |
Refresh Rate | 165Hz (Main and Cover) | 120Hz |
Peak Brightness | 3,000 nits (Peak, Main) / 2,400 nits (Peak, Cover) | 1,000 nits (High Brightness Mode) |
Main Camera | 50MP Wide (f/1.7, 0.8µm), OIS, Instant-all Pixel Focus | 50MP, f/1.8, OIS, PDAF |
Ultra-Wide Camera | N/A (Replaced by Telephoto lens) | 8MP, f/2.2, 120-degree FOV |
Telephoto Camera | 50MP Telephoto (2x optical, f/2.0), 0.64µm; 2x Optical Zoom | No (Not supported) — Includes 2MP Macro f/2.4 |
Optical Zoom | 2x Optical Zoom | No (Not supported) |
Digital Zoom | Up to 30x Digital Zoom | Up to 10x |
Video Recording | 4K@60fps, 1080p@60fps; 4K HDR10+@30fps | 4K UHD @ 30fps; 1080p @ 30/60fps (Gyro-EIS) |
Front Camera | 32MP Front (f/2.4, 0.7µm), Quad Pixel technology | 13MP, f/2.2 |
Battery | 4,000 mAh (Non-removable) | 5,000mAh (Typical) |
Wired Charging | Up to 45W TurboPower (Charger sold separately) | 25W Super Fast Charging (Adapter sold separately) |
Wireless Charging | 15W Wireless Charging; 5W Reverse Charging | No (Not supported) |
Connectivity | 5G (Sub6); Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be); Bluetooth 5.4; NFC; Dual SIM (Nano-SIM + eSIM) | 5G (Sub-6), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Bluetooth 5.3, NFC |
USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
Durability | IPX8 (Water resistant up to 1.5m for 30 min); Gorilla Glass Victus (cover); Vegan leather finish | No official IP rating (Plastic frame/back) |
Dimensions | Unfolded: 6.75" x 2.91" x 0.28" (171.4 x 74.0 x 7.1 mm); Folded: 3.47" x 2.91" x 0.60" (88.1 x 74.0 x 15.3 mm) | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 in (161.0 x 76.5 x 8.3 mm) |
Weight | 6.67 oz (189 g) | 6.95 oz (197 g) |
Biometrics | Side-mounted Fingerprint Reader; Face Unlock | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor, Face Unlock |
Extras | Moto AI features; Snapdragon Sound; Stereo Speakers with Dolby Atmos | Stereo speakers, 3.5mm Headphone Jack, microSD slot, Samsung Wallet |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Motorola razr+ (2024)
Android
3 years of OS upgrades; 4 years of security updates
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Mobile Platform
Qualcomm Adreno 735
12GB LPDDR5X
256GB (UFS 4.0)
Pros
- Largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market
- Incredibly smooth 165Hz refresh rate on both inner and outer displays
Cons
- Lacks an ultrawide camera (swapped for telephoto), limiting landscape shots
- USB-C port is limited to slow USB 2.0 speeds
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Android
4 generations of OS upgrades and 5 years of security updates
Samsung Exynos 1280 (5nm)
Mali-G68
6GB (Standard US config)
128GB (Expandable via microSDXC up to 1TB)
Pros
- Class-leading 120Hz Super AMOLED display (1,000 nits)
- Guaranteed 4 major OS updates (matches flagship standard)
Cons
- Exynos 1280 performance is average compared to competitors
- No official IP rating for water/dust resistance
Which one is better?
The Motorola razr+ (2024) is the better buy for most people - its stunning 6.9" display and ultra-smooth 165Hz refresh rate crush the Galaxy A25 5G.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Motorola razr+ (2024) if: you crave a larger 6.9" display for media, love gaming with a 165Hz refresh rate, or want premium design features.
Choose the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G if: you need a 5,000mAh battery for longer usage, prefer a more budget-friendly option, or want guaranteed software updates for years.
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.3★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose Samsung Galaxy
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose Motorola razr+
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose Samsung Galaxy
Largest and most Priority
Largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market
→ Choose Motorola razr+
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Bottom line: The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G leads with a 4.6★ rating versus 4.3★. That said, Motorola razr+ (2024) could still be the right pick depending on your specific priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Motorola razr+ (2024) or Samsung Galaxy A25 5G?
Motorola razr+ (2024) is the better choice if you prioritize largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G wins if you value class-leading 120hz super amoled display (1,000 nits). Both are rated highly (4.3★ vs 4.6★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Motorola razr+ (2024) and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G?
Key differences: Motorola razr+ (2024) offers largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market, while Samsung Galaxy A25 5G stands out with class-leading 120hz super amoled display (1,000 nits). Consider that Motorola razr+ (2024) lacks an ultrawide camera (swapped for telephoto), limiting landscape shots. Meanwhile, Samsung Galaxy A25 5G exynos 1280 performance is average compared to competitors. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 27, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.