Motorola razr+ (2024) vs Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Get the Motorola razr+ (2024) unless you prioritize budget. The razr+ offers a stunning 6.9" display and 12GB RAM, making it a powerhouse for multitasking and gaming. In real-world use, the razr+'s 165Hz refresh rate offers buttery smooth scrolling and gaming, while the A35's 120Hz display still delivers a great experience. If you need a reliable phone with solid software support, the A35's 4 years of OS updates and 5 years of security updates make it a smart choice for long-term use.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Motorola razr+ (2024)

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Motorola razr+ (2024) vs Samsung Galaxy A35 5G

Motorola razr+ (2024)

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
| Criterion | Motorola razr+ (2024) | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.3(206)Best Buy | ★4.6(389)Best Buy |
Operating System | Android | Android |
Software Support | 3 years of OS upgrades; 4 years of security updates | 4 years of OS upgrades and 5 years of security updates |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Mobile Platform | Samsung Exynos 1380 (5nm octa-core) |
Graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 735 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X | 6GB |
Storage | 256GB (UFS 4.0) | 128GB (Expandable via microSDXC up to 1TB) |
Display Size | Main: 6.9" Foldable + Cover: 4.0" | 6.6" |
Screen Type | Main: Foldable LTPO pOLED; Cover: LTPO pOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1,000 nits (HBM) |
Resolution | Main: 2640 x 1080 pixels (FHD+), 413 ppi; Cover: 1272 x 1080 pixels, 417 ppi | 2340 x 1080 (FHD+) |
Refresh Rate | 165Hz (Main and Cover) | 120Hz (Adaptive) |
Peak Brightness | 3,000 nits (Peak, Main) / 2,400 nits (Peak, Cover) | 1,000 nits (High Brightness Mode) |
Main Camera | 50MP Wide (f/1.7, 0.8µm), OIS, Instant-all Pixel Focus | 50MP, f/1.8, OIS, AF |
Ultra-Wide Camera | N/A (Replaced by Telephoto lens) | 8MP, f/2.2, 123-degree FOV |
Telephoto Camera | 50MP Telephoto (2x optical, f/2.0), 0.64µm; 2x Optical Zoom | No (Not supported) — Includes 5MP Macro f/2.4 |
Optical Zoom | 2x Optical Zoom | No (Not supported) |
Digital Zoom | Up to 30x Digital Zoom | Up to 10x |
Video Recording | 4K@60fps, 1080p@60fps; 4K HDR10+@30fps | 4K UHD (3840 x 2160) @ 30fps; 1080p @ 30/60fps |
Front Camera | 32MP Front (f/2.4, 0.7µm), Quad Pixel technology | 13MP, f/2.2 |
Battery | 4,000 mAh (Non-removable) | 5,000mAh (Typical) |
Wired Charging | Up to 45W TurboPower (Charger sold separately) | 25W Super Fast Charging |
Wireless Charging | 15W Wireless Charging; 5W Reverse Charging | No (Not supported) |
Connectivity | 5G (Sub6); Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be); Bluetooth 5.4; NFC; Dual SIM (Nano-SIM + eSIM) | 5G (Sub-6), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Bluetooth 5.3, NFC |
USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 (OTG) |
Durability | IPX8 (Water resistant up to 1.5m for 30 min); Gorilla Glass Victus (cover); Vegan leather finish | IP67 (Dust/Water Resistant up to 1m for 30 min); Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ (Front) |
Dimensions | Unfolded: 6.75" x 2.91" x 0.28" (171.4 x 74.0 x 7.1 mm); Folded: 3.47" x 2.91" x 0.60" (88.1 x 74.0 x 15.3 mm) | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 in (161.7 x 78.0 x 8.2 mm) |
Weight | 6.67 oz (189 g) | 7.37 oz (209 g) |
Biometrics | Side-mounted Fingerprint Reader; Face Unlock | Optical under-display fingerprint sensor, Face Unlock |
Extras | Moto AI features; Snapdragon Sound; Stereo Speakers with Dolby Atmos | Stereo speakers (Hybrid slot), Samsung Knox Vault, Samsung Wallet |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

Motorola razr+ (2024)
✓ Pros:
- • Largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market
- • Incredibly smooth 165Hz refresh rate on both inner and outer displays
- • Dedicated 2x optical telephoto lens captures excellent portraits
- • IPX8 rating finally matches Samsung's water resistance standard
- • Premium design with Gorilla Glass Victus and high-quality vegan leather
✗ Cons:
- • Lacks an ultrawide camera (swapped for telephoto), limiting landscape shots
- • USB-C port is limited to slow USB 2.0 speeds
- • Software support (3 OS updates) lags behind Samsung and Google (7 years)
- • Battery life (4,000mAh) is decent but trails non-folding flagships
- • No dust resistance rating (IPX8 is water only)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
✓ Pros:
- • Excellent software support (4 OS updates, 5 years security)
- • Bright 120Hz Super AMOLED display with Vision Booster
- • IP67 dust and water resistance rating
- • Premium glass back design (Gorilla Glass Victus+ front)
- • Reliable battery life with 5,000mAh capacity
✗ Cons:
- • Charging speed limited to 25W (Charger sold separately)
- • Virtual proximity sensor rather than hardware
- • No wireless charging support
- • Slightly thick bezels compared to premium models
- • No 3.5mm headphone jack
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The Motorola razr+ (2024) is the better buy for most people - its 6.9" display crushes the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's 6.6".
Who should buy each?
Choose the Motorola razr+ (2024) if: you want a stunning 6.9" display for gaming, need 12GB RAM for multitasking, or love taking portraits with a dedicated telephoto lens.
Choose the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G if: you need over 30 hours of battery life, want excellent software support for the next few years, or prefer a more affordable price point.
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
Motorola razr+ (2024) excels if you value largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is better if you prioritize excellent software support (4 os updates, 5 years security). Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
