Motorola razr+ (2024) vs Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
When comparing the Motorola razr+ (2024) and Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro, the razr+ takes the lead with its flagship status and superior display: 6.9 inches at 165Hz vs 6.6 inches at 120Hz. The razr+ offers a smoother experience for gaming and media consumption, which is a big plus if you're into high refresh rates. . If you need a phone that can take a beating, this is the choice to consider in 2024.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Motorola razr+ (2024)

Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Motorola razr+ (2024) vs Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro

Motorola razr+ (2024)

Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
| Criterion | Motorola razr+ (2024) | Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.3(206)Best Buy | ★3.9(215)Amazon |
Operating System | Android | Android |
Software Support | 3 years of OS upgrades; 4 years of security updates | 4 years of OS upgrades and 5 years of security updates (Enterprise Edition standard) |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Mobile Platform | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) |
Graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 735 | Adreno 642L |
RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X | 6GB |
Storage | 256GB (UFS 4.0) | 128GB (Expandable via microSDXC up to 1TB) |
Display Size | Main: 6.9" Foldable + Cover: 4.0" | 6.6" |
Screen Type | Main: Foldable LTPO pOLED; Cover: LTPO pOLED | PLS LCD, 120Hz, Wet Touch & Glove Mode |
Resolution | Main: 2640 x 1080 pixels (FHD+), 413 ppi; Cover: 1272 x 1080 pixels, 417 ppi | 2408 x 1080 (FHD+) |
Refresh Rate | 165Hz (Main and Cover) | 120Hz |
Peak Brightness | 3,000 nits (Peak, Main) / 2,400 nits (Peak, Cover) | 480 nits (Typical) / 500 nits (Peak) — optimized for indoor/industrial use |
Main Camera | 50MP Wide (f/1.7, 0.8µm), OIS, Instant-all Pixel Focus | 50MP, f/1.8, PDAF, Dual-LED Flash |
Ultra-Wide Camera | N/A (Replaced by Telephoto lens) | 8MP, f/2.2, 123-degree FOV |
Telephoto Camera | 50MP Telephoto (2x optical, f/2.0), 0.64µm; 2x Optical Zoom | No (Not supported) |
Optical Zoom | 2x Optical Zoom | No (Not supported) |
Digital Zoom | Up to 30x Digital Zoom | Up to 10x |
Video Recording | 4K@60fps, 1080p@60fps; 4K HDR10+@30fps | 4K UHD @ 30fps; 1080p @ 60fps |
Front Camera | 32MP Front (f/2.4, 0.7µm), Quad Pixel technology | 13MP, f/2.2 |
Battery | 4,000 mAh (Non-removable) | 4,050mAh (User-Removable) |
Wired Charging | Up to 45W TurboPower (Charger sold separately) | 15W Fast Charging (Support up to 25W with specific adapters); POGO Pin Charging |
Wireless Charging | 15W Wireless Charging; 5W Reverse Charging | No (Standard Qi not supported; POGO charging cradles used instead) |
Connectivity | 5G (Sub6); Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be); Bluetooth 5.4; NFC; Dual SIM (Nano-SIM + eSIM) | 5G (Sub-6), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Bluetooth 5.2, NFC, PTT (Push-to-Talk) |
USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 1 (Supports DeX) |
Durability | IPX8 (Water resistant up to 1.5m for 30 min); Gorilla Glass Victus (cover); Vegan leather finish | IP68 (Water/Dust Resistant); MIL-STD-810H Certified; Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
Dimensions | Unfolded: 6.75" x 2.91" x 0.28" (171.4 x 74.0 x 7.1 mm); Folded: 3.47" x 2.91" x 0.60" (88.1 x 74.0 x 15.3 mm) | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 in (168.8 x 79.9 x 9.9 mm) |
Weight | 6.67 oz (189 g) | 8.29 oz (235 g) |
Biometrics | Side-mounted Fingerprint Reader; Face Unlock | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor, Face Recognition |
Extras | Moto AI features; Snapdragon Sound; Stereo Speakers with Dolby Atmos | Two Programmable Keys (XCover Key, Top Key), Samsung DeX, Dual Microphones, Barometer |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

Motorola razr+ (2024)
✓ Pros:
- • Largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market
- • Incredibly smooth 165Hz refresh rate on both inner and outer displays
- • Dedicated 2x optical telephoto lens captures excellent portraits
- • IPX8 rating finally matches Samsung's water resistance standard
- • Premium design with Gorilla Glass Victus and high-quality vegan leather
✗ Cons:
- • Lacks an ultrawide camera (swapped for telephoto), limiting landscape shots
- • USB-C port is limited to slow USB 2.0 speeds
- • Software support (3 OS updates) lags behind Samsung and Google (7 years)
- • Battery life (4,000mAh) is decent but trails non-folding flagships
- • No dust resistance rating (IPX8 is water only)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
✓ Pros:
- • User-removable battery is a rare and critical feature for field work
- • Rugged build (IP68/MIL-STD-810H) survives drops without a case
- • Physical programmable keys are excellent for Push-to-Talk or app launching
- • Supports Wi-Fi 6E and Samsung DeX for desktop-like productivity
- • Touchscreen works with gloves and in wet conditions
✗ Cons:
- • Display brightness (~500 nits) is low for outdoor use compared to S-series
- • No standard Qi wireless charging (requires proprietary POGO docks)
- • Charging speed is modest (15W included, 25W capable)
- • Cameras are functional but lack optical stabilization (OIS)
- • Price is high relative to raw performance specs (paying for ruggedness)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The Motorola razr+ (2024) is the better buy for most people - its stunning 6.9" 165Hz display crushes the Galaxy XCover6 Pro's 6.6" 120Hz screen.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Motorola razr+ (2024) if: you want a gorgeous display for gaming, enjoy high refresh rates for smooth scrolling, or prefer a premium design. (6.9" display, 165 Hz refresh)
Choose the Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro if: you need a rugged phone for outdoor use, require a user-removable battery for extended trips, or value PTT features for work. (6.6" display, 120 Hz refresh)
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
Motorola razr+ (2024) excels if you value largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market. Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro is better if you prioritize user-removable battery is a rare and critical feature for field work. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
