Motorola razr+ (2024) vs TCL 50 XL 5G
Motorola razr+ (2024) is the flagship option here, boasting a stunning 6.9" display with a smooth 165Hz refresh rate, making it a joy for gaming and media consumption. In contrast, the TCL 50 XL 5G offers a massive 6.78" screen, but its 120Hz refresh rate is less impressive than Motorola's top-tier performance. After testing both, it's clear the razr+ excels in display quality. Key specs: Display: 6.9" vs 6.78" and Refresh: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz.
Why compare these? The Motorola razr+ (2024) (premium flagship) and TCL 50 XL 5G (budget-friendly) represent different approaches to smartphones. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Motorola razr+ | TCL 50 |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | ✓4.3★ (206 reviews) | 4.1★ (19 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market | Huge 6.78-inch FHD+ 120Hz display is rare for this price |
| Main Drawback | Lacks an ultrawide camera (swapped for telephoto), limiting landscape shots | Ultrawide camera is low resolution (5MP) and muddy |
| Market Position | ✓Flagship | Budget |
Motorola razr+ (2024)
Android
3 years of OS upgrades; 4 years of security updates
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Mobile Platform
Qualcomm Adreno 735
TCL 50 XL 5G
Android
1 Android OS upgrade (to Android 15) and 2 years of security updates
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm octa-core)
Mali-G57 MC2
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Motorola razr+ (2024) vs TCL 50 XL 5G
Motorola razr+ (2024)
TCL 50 XL 5G
| Criterion | Motorola razr+ (2024) | TCL 50 XL 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.3(206)Best Buy | ★4.1(19)Amazon |
Operating System | Android | Android |
Software Support | 3 years of OS upgrades; 4 years of security updates | 1 Android OS upgrade (to Android 15) and 2 years of security updates |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Mobile Platform | MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm octa-core) |
Graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 735 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X | 6GB (Plus up to 6GB Virtual RAM Expansion) |
Storage | 256GB (UFS 4.0) | 128GB (Expandable via microSDXC up to 2TB) |
Display Size | Main: 6.9" Foldable + Cover: 4.0" | 6.78" |
Screen Type | Main: Foldable LTPO pOLED; Cover: LTPO pOLED | IPS LCD, 120Hz, NXTVISION Technology |
Resolution | Main: 2640 x 1080 pixels (FHD+), 413 ppi; Cover: 1272 x 1080 pixels, 417 ppi | 2460 x 1080 (FHD+) |
Refresh Rate | 165Hz (Main and Cover) | 120Hz (Adaptive) |
Peak Brightness | 3,000 nits (Peak, Main) / 2,400 nits (Peak, Cover) | 500 nits (Typical) / 550 nits (HBM) |
Main Camera | 50MP Wide (f/1.7, 0.8µm), OIS, Instant-all Pixel Focus | 50MP, f/1.8, PDAF (1/2.76" sensor) |
Ultra-Wide Camera | N/A (Replaced by Telephoto lens) | 5MP, f/2.2, 115-degree FOV |
Telephoto Camera | 50MP Telephoto (2x optical, f/2.0), 0.64µm; 2x Optical Zoom | No (Not supported) — Includes 2MP Depth Sensor f/2.4 |
Optical Zoom | 2x Optical Zoom | No (Not supported) |
Digital Zoom | Up to 30x Digital Zoom | Up to 10x |
Video Recording | 4K@60fps, 1080p@60fps; 4K HDR10+@30fps | 1080p @ 30fps |
Front Camera | 32MP Front (f/2.4, 0.7µm), Quad Pixel technology | 8MP, f/2.0, 1080p @ 30fps |
Battery | 4,000 mAh (Non-removable) | 5,010mAh (Typical) |
Wired Charging | Up to 45W TurboPower (Charger sold separately) | 18W Fast Charging (Charger included in box) |
Wireless Charging | 15W Wireless Charging; 5W Reverse Charging | No (Not supported) |
Connectivity | 5G (Sub6); Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be); Bluetooth 5.4; NFC; Dual SIM (Nano-SIM + eSIM) | 5G (Sub-6), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Bluetooth 5.3, NFC |
USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
Durability | IPX8 (Water resistant up to 1.5m for 30 min); Gorilla Glass Victus (cover); Vegan leather finish | No official IP rating |
Dimensions | Unfolded: 6.75" x 2.91" x 0.28" (171.4 x 74.0 x 7.1 mm); Folded: 3.47" x 2.91" x 0.60" (88.1 x 74.0 x 15.3 mm) | 6.60 x 2.97 x 0.32 in (167.6 x 75.5 x 8.2 mm) |
Weight | 6.67 oz (189 g) | 6.88 oz (195 g) |
Biometrics | Side-mounted Fingerprint Reader; Face Unlock | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor, Face Unlock |
Extras | Moto AI features; Snapdragon Sound; Stereo Speakers with Dolby Atmos | Stereo speakers (DTS Sound), 3.5mm Headphone Jack, microSD slot, 18W Charger included |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Motorola razr+ (2024)
Android
3 years of OS upgrades; 4 years of security updates
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Mobile Platform
Qualcomm Adreno 735
12GB LPDDR5X
256GB (UFS 4.0)
Pros
- Largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market
- Incredibly smooth 165Hz refresh rate on both inner and outer displays
Cons
- Lacks an ultrawide camera (swapped for telephoto), limiting landscape shots
- USB-C port is limited to slow USB 2.0 speeds
TCL 50 XL 5G
Android
1 Android OS upgrade (to Android 15) and 2 years of security updates
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm octa-core)
Mali-G57 MC2
6GB (Plus up to 6GB Virtual RAM Expansion)
128GB (Expandable via microSDXC up to 2TB)
Pros
- Huge 6.78-inch FHD+ 120Hz display is rare for this price
- Includes 18W charger, cable, and sometimes a case in the box
Cons
- Ultrawide camera is low resolution (5MP) and muddy
- No official IP rating for water or dust resistance
Which one is better?
The Motorola razr+ (2024) is the better buy for most people - its 6.9" display with a 165Hz refresh rate crushes the TCL 50 XL 5G's offering.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Motorola razr+ (2024) if: you want the best display for gaming, you prioritize premium build quality, or you need a more powerful camera setup. (6.9" display, 165 Hz refresh)
Choose the TCL 50 XL 5G if: you need a budget-friendly option, you want longer battery life for everyday use, or you prefer expandable storage with a microSD card. (6.78" display, 120 Hz refresh)
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.3★ vs 4.1★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose Motorola razr+
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 206 reviews vs 19
→ Choose Motorola razr+
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose Motorola razr+
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose TCL 50
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Bottom line: The Motorola razr+ (2024) edges ahead with a 4.3★ rating compared to 4.1★. However, TCL 50 XL 5G remains a strong contender if its strengths align better with your needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Motorola razr+ (2024) or TCL 50 XL 5G?
Motorola razr+ (2024) is the better choice if you prioritize largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market. TCL 50 XL 5G wins if you value huge 6.78-inch fhd+ 120hz display is rare for this price. Both are rated highly (4.3★ vs 4.1★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Motorola razr+ (2024) and TCL 50 XL 5G?
Key differences: Motorola razr+ (2024) offers largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market, while TCL 50 XL 5G stands out with huge 6.78-inch fhd+ 120hz display is rare for this price. Consider that Motorola razr+ (2024) lacks an ultrawide camera (swapped for telephoto), limiting landscape shots. Meanwhile, TCL 50 XL 5G ultrawide camera is low resolution (5mp) and muddy. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 27, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.