Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor vs LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
When comparing the Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor and the LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor, the numbers tell a compelling story. The LG model is the mid-range powerhouse here, boasting a higher resolution of 3440 x 1440 compared to the Samsung's 1920 x 1080, making it a no-brainer for gamers and creatives alike who crave detail and screen real estate. In real-world use, the LG's 160Hz refresh rate crushes the Samsung's 60Hz, providing smoother motion during fast-paced gaming. This means less motion blur and a more immersive experience, especially in action-packed games, while the Samsung's lower specs may leave competitive gamers wanting more. If you're considering an upgrade in 2026, the LG is worth every penny for its performance advantages. Key specs: Display: 26.9" vs 34" and Refresh: 60 Hz vs 160 Hz.
Why compare these? The Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor (entry-level) and LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor (mid-range) represent different approaches to monitors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Samsung CR500 | LG 34WP60C-B |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.6★ (2,830 reviews) | 4.6★ (1,104 reviews) |
| Top Strength | 1800R curvature wraps the field of view for improved immersion | Expansive 21:9 WQHD resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9 |
| Main Drawback | Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not ideal for competitive gaming) | Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments |
| Market Position | Entry | ✓Mid-range |
Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor
26.9" Viewable (27" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
34" Viewable (34" Class)
3440 x 1440 (WQHD)
21:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor vs LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
| Criterion | Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor | LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(2,830)Amazon | ★4.6(1,104)Amazon |
Screen Size | 26.9" Viewable (27" Class) | 34" Viewable (34" Class) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 3440 x 1440 (WQHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 21:9 |
Screen Type | VA (Vertical Alignment) | VA (Vertical Alignment) |
Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 160 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 100 Hz (via HDMI) |
Response Time | 4 ms (GtG) | 5 ms (GtG Faster) / 1 ms (MBR) |
Brightness | 250 nits (Typical) / 300 nits (Peak) | 300 nits (Typical) / 240 nits (Min) |
Contrast | 3,000:1 (Static) | 3,000:1 (Typical) |
Color Gamut | 72% NTSC (CIE 1976) | 99% sRGB (CIE1931) |
Color Depth | 16.7M (8-bit) | 1.07 Billion (10-bit) |
HDR | No (Not supported) | HDR10 |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync | AMD FreeSync Premium |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | 1800R | 1800R |
Speakers | No (None) | No (None) |
Ports | 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x VGA (D-Sub); 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out |
USB C | No | No |
Kvm | No | No |
Vesa | 75 x 75 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-2° to 22°) | Tilt only (-5° to 15°) |
Power Consumption | 35 W (Max) / 0.3 W (Standby) | 42 W (Typical) / 45 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Sleep) |
Weight With Stand | 4,300 g (9.48 lbs) | 6,800 g (14.99 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor
26.9" Viewable (27" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
60 Hz
4 ms (GtG)
Pros
- 1800R curvature wraps the field of view for improved immersion
- High 3,000:1 contrast ratio delivers deep, rich blacks ideal for movies
Cons
- Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not ideal for competitive gaming)
- Stand lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments (Tilt only)
LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor
34" Viewable (34" Class)
3440 x 1440 (WQHD)
21:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
160 Hz (via DisplayPort) / 100 Hz (via HDMI)
5 ms (GtG Faster) / 1 ms (MBR)
Pros
- Expansive 21:9 WQHD resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9
- High 160Hz refresh rate (via DisplayPort) delivers fluid motion for gaming
Cons
- Stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments
- HDMI ports are version 2.0, limiting refresh rate to 100Hz at native resolution
Which one is better?
The LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 3440 x 1440 resolution crushes the Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor. That said, grab the Samsung if you want a more affordable option with decent performance for everyday tasks.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor if: you need a budget-friendly display, watch movies occasionally, or work in a well-lit room. (26.9" display, 60 Hz refresh)
Choose the LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor if: you game regularly, want an immersive ultrawide experience, or require a higher resolution for productivity. (34" display, 160 Hz refresh)
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 2,830 reviews vs 1,104
→ Choose Samsung CR500
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose LG 34WP60C-B
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose Samsung CR500
1800R curvature wraps Priority
1800R curvature wraps the field of view for improved immersion
→ Choose Samsung CR500
Conclusion
There is no wrong answer here. Focus on the features you will use daily and pick the model that aligns with them.
Bottom line: Both products share a 4.6★ rating, making this comparison particularly close. Your decision should come down to which specific features matter most to you.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor or LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor?
Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize 1800r curvature wraps the field of view for improved immersion. LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor wins if you value expansive 21:9 wqhd resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9. Both are rated highly (4.6★ vs 4.6★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor and LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor?
Key differences: Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor offers 1800r curvature wraps the field of view for improved immersion, while LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor stands out with expansive 21:9 wqhd resolution (3440 x 1440) offers 33% more screen space than 16:9. Consider that Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor limited to 60hz refresh rate (not ideal for competitive gaming). Meanwhile, LG 34WP60C-B 34" Ultrawide Curved WQHD 160Hz Monitor stand is tilt-only; lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.