Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor vs LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor
If you're deciding between the Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor and the LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor, the LG model takes the lead for many users. With a stunning 2560 x 2880 resolution, it offers a sharper image than the Samsung's 1920 x 1080 display. In real-world use, this means more detail for creative tasks and productivity. The Samsung CR500 is the budget pick, but its lower resolution and limited color gamut may not cut it for professionals who demand the best visuals, especially when the LG covers 98% of the DCI-P3 color space compared to Samsung's 72% NTSC. This difference can be a game-changer for photographers and designers in 2026. Key specs: Display: 26.9" vs 27.6" and Weight: 151.68 oz vs 317.47 oz.
Why compare these? The Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor (entry-level) and LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor (premium flagship) represent different approaches to monitors. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Samsung CR500 | LG DualUp |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | 4.6★ (2,830 reviews) | ✓4.7★ (36 reviews) |
| Top Strength | 1800R curvature wraps the field of view for improved immersion | Unique 16:18 aspect ratio provides the vertical workspace of two 21.5-inch monitors without the bezel gap |
| Main Drawback | Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not ideal for competitive gaming) | Strictly limited to 60Hz with no VRR, making it poor for gaming |
| Market Position | Entry | ✓Flagship |

Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor
26.9" Viewable (27" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)

LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor
27.6" Viewable (28" Class)
2560 x 2880 (SDQHD)
16:18
Nano IPS
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor vs LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor

Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor

LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor
| Criterion | Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor | LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(2,830)Amazon | ★4.7(36)Best Buy |
Screen Size | 26.9" Viewable (27" Class) | 27.6" Viewable (28" Class) |
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (FHD) | 2560 x 2880 (SDQHD) |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:18 |
Screen Type | VA (Vertical Alignment) | Nano IPS |
Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
Response Time | 4 ms (GtG) | 5 ms (GtG) |
Brightness | 250 nits (Typical) / 300 nits (Peak) | 300 nits (Typical) |
Contrast | 3,000:1 (Static) | 1,000:1 (Typical) |
Color Gamut | 72% NTSC (CIE 1976) | 98% DCI-P3 (CIE1976) |
Color Depth | 16.7M (8-bit) | 1.07 Billion (10-bit) |
HDR | No (Not supported) | HDR10 |
Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync | No (Not supported) |
Viewing Angles | 178° (H) / 178° (V) | 178° (H) / 178° (V) |
Curvature | 1800R | Flat |
Speakers | No (None) | 2x 7 W (Stereo with MaxxAudio) |
Ports | 1x HDMI 1.4; 1x VGA (D-Sub); 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out | 2x HDMI 2.0; 1x DisplayPort 1.4; 1x USB-C (90W PD, Data, Video); 2x USB-A 3.0 Downstream; 1x USB-B 2.0 Upstream; 1x 3.5mm Headphone Out |
USB C | No | Yes (90W Power Delivery + Video + Data) |
Kvm | No | Yes (Built-in Auto KVM & PBP) |
Vesa | 75 x 75 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
Ergonomics | Tilt only (-2° to 22°) | Ergo Stand (C-Clamp/Grommet): Extend/Retract (210mm), Swivel (±335°), Pivot (90° CCW), Height (130mm), Tilt (±25°) |
Power Consumption | 35 W (Max) / 0.3 W (Standby) | 40 W (Typical) / 190 W (Max) / 0.5 W (Sleep) |
Weight With Stand | 4,300 g (9.48 lbs) | 9,000 g (19.8 lbs) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor
26.9" Viewable (27" Class)
1920 x 1080 (FHD)
16:9
VA (Vertical Alignment)
60 Hz
4 ms (GtG)
Pros
- 1800R curvature wraps the field of view for improved immersion
- High 3,000:1 contrast ratio delivers deep, rich blacks ideal for movies
Cons
- Limited to 60Hz refresh rate (not ideal for competitive gaming)
- Stand lacks height, swivel, or pivot adjustments (Tilt only)

LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor
27.6" Viewable (28" Class)
2560 x 2880 (SDQHD)
16:18
Nano IPS
60 Hz
5 ms (GtG)
Pros
- Unique 16:18 aspect ratio provides the vertical workspace of two 21.5-inch monitors without the bezel gap
- Nano IPS panel covers 98% DCI-P3, offering professional-grade color accuracy for creators
Cons
- Strictly limited to 60Hz with no VRR, making it poor for gaming
- Unconventional aspect ratio (2560x2880) may require scaling tweaks in macOS/Windows
Which one is better?
The LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor is the better buy for most people - its 2560 x 2880 resolution crushes the Samsung CR500's 1920 x 1080.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor if: you want an affordable option for casual use, prefer a curved design for immersive viewing, or need a monitor for basic office tasks. (26.9" display, 151.68 oz weight)
Choose the LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor if: you work with graphics or video, need extensive vertical screen space, or want to take advantage of its professional-grade color accuracy. (27.6" display, 317.47 oz weight)
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.7★ vs 4.6★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose LG DualUp
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 2,830 reviews vs 36
→ Choose Samsung CR500
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose LG DualUp
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose Samsung CR500
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Bottom line: The LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor leads with a 4.7★ rating versus 4.6★. That said, Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor could still be the right pick depending on your specific priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor or LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor?
Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor is the better choice if you prioritize 1800r curvature wraps the field of view for improved immersion. LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor wins if you value unique 16:18 aspect ratio provides the vertical workspace of two 21.5-inch monitors without the bezel gap. Both are rated highly (4.6★ vs 4.7★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor and LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor?
Key differences: Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor offers 1800r curvature wraps the field of view for improved immersion, while LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor stands out with unique 16:18 aspect ratio provides the vertical workspace of two 21.5-inch monitors without the bezel gap. Consider that Samsung CR500 Series 27" Curved FHD Monitor limited to 60hz refresh rate (not ideal for competitive gaming). Meanwhile, LG DualUp 28MQ780-B 27.6" 16:18 Ergo Monitor strictly limited to 60hz with no vrr, making it poor for gaming. Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 26, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
