Samsung Galaxy A25 5G vs Motorola razr (2023)
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is the budget option here. Meanwhile, the Motorola razr (2023) offers a unique foldable design and a 144Hz refresh rate, making it a strong contender in the mid-range market. Key specs: Display: 6.5" vs 6.9" and Refresh: 120 Hz vs 144 Hz.
Why compare these? The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (budget-friendly) and Motorola razr (2023) (mid-range) represent different approaches to smartphones. While they may appeal to different budgets, many buyers consider both options. This 2026 comparison helps you decide if the differences justify the price gap.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Samsung Galaxy | Motorola razr |
|---|---|---|
| User Rating | ✓4.6★ (176 reviews) | 4.3★ (513 reviews) |
| Top Strength | Class-leading 120Hz Super AMOLED display (1,000 nits) | Most accessible price point for a new foldable phone in the US |
| Main Drawback | Exynos 1280 performance is average compared to competitors | External display (1.5") is tiny and only useful for basic notifications (unlike Razr+) |
| Market Position | Budget | ✓Mid-range |
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Android
4 generations of OS upgrades and 5 years of security updates
Samsung Exynos 1280 (5nm)
Mali-G68
Motorola razr (2023)
Android
3 Android OS upgrades and 4 years of bi-monthly security updates
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)
Adreno 644
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A25 5G vs Motorola razr (2023)
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Motorola razr (2023)
| Criterion | Samsung Galaxy A25 5G | Motorola razr (2023) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.6(176)Best Buy | ★4.3(513)Best Buy |
Operating System | Android | Android |
Software Support | 4 generations of OS upgrades and 5 years of security updates | 3 Android OS upgrades and 4 years of bi-monthly security updates |
Processor | Samsung Exynos 1280 (5nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm) |
Graphics | Mali-G68 | Adreno 644 |
RAM | 6GB (Standard US config) | 8GB LPDDR4X |
Storage | 128GB (Expandable via microSDXC up to 1TB) | 128GB UFS 2.2 (Non-expandable) |
Display Size | 6.5" | Main: 6.9" / External: 1.5" |
Screen Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1,000 nits (HBM) | Main: FHD+ pOLED, LTPO, 144Hz / External: OLED, 60Hz |
Resolution | 2340 x 1080 (FHD+) | Main: 2640 x 1080 (413 ppi) / External: 194 x 368 (282 ppi) |
Refresh Rate | 120Hz | Main: Up to 144Hz / External: 60Hz |
Peak Brightness | 1,000 nits (High Brightness Mode) | 1,400 nits (Main Peak) / 1,000 nits (External Peak) |
Main Camera | 50MP, f/1.8, OIS, PDAF | 64MP, f/1.7, 0.7µm, OIS, Laser AF (Quad Pixel to 16MP) |
Ultra-Wide Camera | 8MP, f/2.2, 120-degree FOV | 13MP, f/2.2, 120-degree FOV, Macro Vision |
Telephoto Camera | No (Not supported) — Includes 2MP Macro f/2.4 | No (Not supported) |
Optical Zoom | No (Not supported) | No (Not supported) |
Digital Zoom | Up to 10x | Up to 8x |
Video Recording | 4K UHD @ 30fps; 1080p @ 30/60fps (Gyro-EIS) | 4K UHD @ 30fps; 1080p @ 30/60fps |
Front Camera | 13MP, f/2.2 | 32MP, f/2.4, 0.7µm (Quad Pixel to 8MP) |
Battery | 5,000mAh (Typical) | 4,200mAh (Non-removable) |
Wired Charging | 25W Super Fast Charging (Adapter sold separately) | 30W TurboPower (Charger NOT included in US retail box) |
Wireless Charging | No (Not supported) | 5W Wireless Charging |
Connectivity | 5G (Sub-6), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Bluetooth 5.3, NFC | 5G (Sub-6/mmWave - Carrier Dependent), Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC |
USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
Durability | No official IP rating (Plastic frame/back) | IP52 (Water-repellent coating - Splash Resistant only) |
Dimensions | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 in (161.0 x 76.5 x 8.3 mm) | Open: 6.73 x 2.91 x 0.29 in (170.8 x 74.0 x 7.35 mm) / Closed: 3.47 x 2.91 x 0.62 in |
Weight | 6.95 oz (197 g) | 6.65 oz (188.6 g) |
Biometrics | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor, Face Unlock | Side-mounted fingerprint reader, Face Unlock |
Extras | Stereo speakers, 3.5mm Headphone Jack, microSD slot, Samsung Wallet | Vegan Leather finish, Stereo Speakers (Dolby Atmos), Ready For (Wireless only) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Android
4 generations of OS upgrades and 5 years of security updates
Samsung Exynos 1280 (5nm)
Mali-G68
6GB (Standard US config)
128GB (Expandable via microSDXC up to 1TB)
Pros
- Class-leading 120Hz Super AMOLED display (1,000 nits)
- Guaranteed 4 major OS updates (matches flagship standard)
Cons
- Exynos 1280 performance is average compared to competitors
- No official IP rating for water/dust resistance
Motorola razr (2023)
Android
3 Android OS upgrades and 4 years of bi-monthly security updates
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)
Adreno 644
8GB LPDDR4X
128GB UFS 2.2 (Non-expandable)
Pros
- Most accessible price point for a new foldable phone in the US
- Battery life (4,200mAh) exceeds that of the premium Razr+ and Galaxy Z Flip5
Cons
- External display (1.5") is tiny and only useful for basic notifications (unlike Razr+)
- Charger is NOT included in the box (unlike previous Moto G phones)
Which one is better?
Grab the razr if you want a foldable design and a 144Hz display - it's a unique experience worth considering.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G if: you need a long-lasting battery for travel, you prefer a smooth display for gaming, or you want guaranteed software support for four years. (6.5" display, 120 Hz refresh)
Choose the Motorola razr (2023) if: you want a stylish foldable phone, you enjoy faster refresh rates for smoother scrolling, or you value a premium design with a unique form factor. (6.9" display, 144 Hz refresh)
Quality Seekers
Higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.3★) indicates better overall satisfaction
→ Choose Samsung Galaxy
Safe Choice Buyers
More widely tested with 513 reviews vs 176
→ Choose Motorola razr
Premium Buyers
Higher-tier option with more premium features and build quality
→ Choose Motorola razr
Value Seekers
Better value proposition for buyers who don't need top-tier features
→ Choose Samsung Galaxy
Conclusion
With the key differences outlined, the decision should be clearer. Both options deliver quality—choose the one that fits your priorities.
Bottom line: The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G edges ahead with a 4.6★ rating compared to 4.3★. However, Motorola razr (2023) remains a strong contender if its strengths align better with your needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which is better: Samsung Galaxy A25 5G or Motorola razr (2023)?
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is the better choice if you prioritize class-leading 120hz super amoled display (1,000 nits). Motorola razr (2023) wins if you value most accessible price point for a new foldable phone in the us. Both are rated highly (4.6★ vs 4.3★), so consider your specific needs and budget.
+What are the main differences between Samsung Galaxy A25 5G and Motorola razr (2023)?
Key differences: Samsung Galaxy A25 5G offers class-leading 120hz super amoled display (1,000 nits), while Motorola razr (2023) stands out with most accessible price point for a new foldable phone in the us. Consider that Samsung Galaxy A25 5G exynos 1280 performance is average compared to competitors. Meanwhile, Motorola razr (2023) external display (1.5") is tiny and only useful for basic notifications (unlike razr+). Check the detailed specs table above for a complete comparison.
+Where can US buyers get the best price?
For US buyers, Amazon typically offers competitive pricing with Prime shipping, easy returns, and reliable warranty support. We recommend comparing prices on both products using our affiliate links above—prices fluctuate regularly, and you may find sales or deals.
+Is this comparison up to date?
Yes, this comparison is current for 2026. We regularly verify specs, ratings, and availability. Last verified: January 27, 2026. PageBen uses affiliate links for monetization, but our recommendations are research-driven and independent.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.