Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Motorola razr+ (2024)
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is the flagship powerhouse, while the Motorola razr+ (2024) brings a unique flip design to the table. In real-world use, you'll find the S22 Ultra's 108MP camera crushes the razr+’s 50MP setup, especially for photography enthusiasts looking to capture stunning details. The razr+ has a lighter build at 6.67oz compared to the S22 Ultra's hefty 8.08oz, making it more comfortable for daily carry. Plus, the razr+ features a super smooth 165Hz refresh rate, perfect for gaming and scrolling, while the S22 Ultra's display caps at 120Hz, which is still impressive but feels slightly less responsive in comparison.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

Motorola razr+ (2024)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Motorola razr+ (2024)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

Motorola razr+ (2024)
| Criterion | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | Motorola razr+ (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.7(1,325)Best Buy | ★4.3(206)Best Buy |
Operating System | Android | Android |
Software Support | 4 generations of OS upgrades; 5 years of security updates | 3 years of OS upgrades; 4 years of security updates |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Mobile Platform | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Mobile Platform |
Graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 730 | Qualcomm Adreno 735 |
RAM | 8GB / 12GB LPDDR5 | 12GB LPDDR5X |
Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB (UFS 3.1) | 256GB (UFS 4.0) |
Display Size | 6.8" (measured diagonally; actual viewable area is less) | Main: 6.9" Foldable + Cover: 4.0" |
Screen Type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X Infinity-O Display | Main: Foldable LTPO pOLED; Cover: LTPO pOLED |
Resolution | 3088 x 1440 pixels (QHD+), 500 ppi | Main: 2640 x 1080 pixels (FHD+), 413 ppi; Cover: 1272 x 1080 pixels, 417 ppi |
Refresh Rate | 1–120Hz (Adaptive) | 165Hz (Main and Cover) |
Peak Brightness | 1,750 nits (Peak) | 3,000 nits (Peak, Main) / 2,400 nits (Peak, Cover) |
Main Camera | 108MP Wide (f/1.8, 85° FOV), Laser AF, OIS | 50MP Wide (f/1.7, 0.8µm), OIS, Instant-all Pixel Focus |
Ultra-Wide Camera | 12MP Ultra-Wide (f/2.2, 120° FOV) | N/A (Replaced by Telephoto lens) |
Telephoto Camera | 10MP Telephoto (3x optical, f/2.4) + 10MP Periscope (10x optical, f/4.9); OIS | 50MP Telephoto (2x optical, f/2.0), 0.64µm; 2x Optical Zoom |
Optical Zoom | 3x, 10x Optical Zoom | 2x Optical Zoom |
Digital Zoom | Up to 100x Space Zoom | Up to 30x Digital Zoom |
Video Recording | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps | 4K@60fps, 1080p@60fps; 4K HDR10+@30fps |
Front Camera | 40MP Front (f/2.2, 80° FOV), PDAF | 32MP Front (f/2.4, 0.7µm), Quad Pixel technology |
Battery | 5,000 mAh (Typical) | 4,000 mAh (Non-removable) |
Wired Charging | Up to 45W Super Fast Charging 2.0 (Adapter sold separately) | Up to 45W TurboPower (Charger sold separately) |
Wireless Charging | Fast Wireless Charging 2.0 (15W); Wireless PowerShare | 15W Wireless Charging; 5W Reverse Charging |
Connectivity | 5G (Sub6/mmWave); Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax); Bluetooth 5.2; NFC; UWB | 5G (Sub6); Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be); Bluetooth 5.4; NFC; Dual SIM (Nano-SIM + eSIM) |
USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
Durability | IP68 (Water resistant up to 1.5 meters for 30 min); Armor Aluminum frame; Gorilla Glass Victus+ | IPX8 (Water resistant up to 1.5m for 30 min); Gorilla Glass Victus (cover); Vegan leather finish |
Dimensions | 6.43" x 3.07" x 0.35" (163.3 x 77.9 x 8.9 mm) | Unfolded: 6.75" x 2.91" x 0.28" (171.4 x 74.0 x 7.1 mm); Folded: 3.47" x 2.91" x 0.60" (88.1 x 74.0 x 15.3 mm) |
Weight | 8.08 oz (229 g) | 6.67 oz (189 g) |
Biometrics | Ultrasonic Fingerprint Sensor; Face Recognition | Side-mounted Fingerprint Reader; Face Unlock |
Extras | Integrated S Pen (2.8ms latency); Samsung DeX; Samsung Knox | Moto AI features; Snapdragon Sound; Stereo Speakers with Dolby Atmos |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
✓ Pros:
- • Integrated S Pen with ultra-low latency (2.8ms)
- • Versatile camera system with dual telephoto lenses (3x and 10x optical)
- • Bright, sharp QHD+ display with adaptive 120Hz refresh rate
- • Excellent build quality with Armor Aluminum and Gorilla Glass Victus+
- • Long software support commitment (4 OS upgrades)
✗ Cons:
- • Large, heavy, and boxy design can be unwieldy
- • Battery life is average despite 5,000mAh capacity
- • 45W charging speed does not significantly outperform 25W in real-world tests
- • No microSD card slot or headphone jack
- • Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 can throttle performance under heavy sustained load
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Motorola razr+ (2024)
✓ Pros:
- • Largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market
- • Incredibly smooth 165Hz refresh rate on both inner and outer displays
- • Dedicated 2x optical telephoto lens captures excellent portraits
- • IPX8 rating finally matches Samsung's water resistance standard
- • Premium design with Gorilla Glass Victus and high-quality vegan leather
✗ Cons:
- • Lacks an ultrawide camera (swapped for telephoto), limiting landscape shots
- • USB-C port is limited to slow USB 2.0 speeds
- • Software support (3 OS updates) lags behind Samsung and Google (7 years)
- • Battery life (4,000mAh) is decent but trails non-folding flagships
- • No dust resistance rating (IPX8 is water only)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is the better buy for most people - its 108MP camera crushes the razr+’s 50MP. That said, grab the Motorola razr+ if you want a lighter phone with a unique folding design - it's lighter and offers a functional cover screen.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra if: you shoot a lot of photos, need 30 hours of video playback, or want the integrated S Pen for productivity.
Choose the Motorola razr+ (2024) if: you want a unique folding design, prefer a lighter phone at 6.67oz, or enjoy super smooth gaming with a 165Hz refresh rate.
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helps you buy with confidence. Both products are dependable; the right one depends on how you will use it.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra excels if you value integrated s pen with ultra-low latency (2.8ms). Motorola razr+ (2024) is better if you prioritize largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
