Samsung Galaxy S23 vs Motorola razr (2023)
Get the Samsung Galaxy S23 unless you crave a foldable design. The numbers say it all: a powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chip vs Motorola razr (2023)'s Snapdragon 7 Gen 1. The S23's performance crushes the razr, making it the smarter buy for demanding users. In real-world use, the Galaxy S23's 3900mAh battery provides solid endurance, lasting up to 22 hours of video playback. For daily usage, the S23's brighter 1750 nits display also shines in outdoor conditions, while the razr's 144Hz refresh rate is great for smooth scrolling but lacks the same brightness level.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Samsung Galaxy S23

Motorola razr (2023)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Samsung Galaxy S23 vs Motorola razr (2023)

Samsung Galaxy S23

Motorola razr (2023)
| Criterion | Samsung Galaxy S23 | Motorola razr (2023) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.4(101)Best Buy | ★4.3(513)Best Buy |
Operating System | Android | Android |
Software Support | 4 generations of OS upgrades (Android 14, 15, 16, 17); 5 years of security updates (guaranteed until 2028) | 3 Android OS upgrades and 4 years of bi-monthly security updates |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (4nm; 8-core CPU: 1x3.36GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8GHz A715, 2x2.8GHz A710, 3x2.0GHz A510) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm) |
Graphics | Adreno 740 (719 MHz) | Adreno 644 |
RAM | 8 GB (LPDDR5X) | 8GB LPDDR4X |
Storage | 128GB (UFS 3.1) / 256GB (UFS 4.0) / 512GB (UFS 4.0) | 128GB UFS 2.2 (Non-expandable) |
Display Size | 6.1" (6.1" full rectangle; 5.9" accounting for rounded corners) | Main: 6.9" / External: 1.5" |
Screen Type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | Main: FHD+ pOLED, LTPO, 144Hz / External: OLED, 60Hz |
Resolution | 2340 x 1080 pixels (FHD+, 425 ppi) | Main: 2640 x 1080 (413 ppi) / External: 194 x 368 (282 ppi) |
Refresh Rate | Adaptive 48–120 Hz | Main: Up to 144Hz / External: 60Hz |
Peak Brightness | 1200 nits (HBM); 1750 nits peak (outdoor) | 1,400 nits (Main Peak) / 1,000 nits (External Peak) |
Main Camera | 50MP Wide (24 mm, f/1.8), Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS | 64MP, f/1.7, 0.7µm, OIS, Laser AF (Quad Pixel to 16MP) |
Ultra-Wide Camera | 12MP Ultra Wide (13 mm, f/2.2, 120° FOV), Super Steady video | 13MP, f/2.2, 120-degree FOV, Macro Vision |
Telephoto Camera | 10MP Telephoto (70 mm, f/2.4), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom | No (Not supported) |
Optical Zoom | 3x optical zoom; 30x Space Zoom | No (Not supported) |
Digital Zoom | Up to 30x | Up to 8x |
Video Recording | 8K video at 24/30 fps; 4K at 30/60 fps; Slow motion 1080p at 240/960 fps | 4K UHD @ 30fps; 1080p @ 30/60fps |
Front Camera | 12MP Front (26 mm, f/2.2), Dual Pixel PDAF; 4K video at 30/60 fps | 32MP, f/2.4, 0.7µm (Quad Pixel to 8MP) |
Battery | 3900 mAh (Li-ion); Up to 22 hours video playback | 4,200mAh (Non-removable) |
Wired Charging | USB-C; Up to 50% in ~30 minutes with 25W adapter (sold separately) | 30W TurboPower (Charger NOT included in US retail box) |
Wireless Charging | Fast Wireless Charging 2.0 (up to 15W); Wireless PowerShare (4.5W) | 5W Wireless Charging |
Connectivity | 5G (sub-6 GHz and mmWave); Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax); Bluetooth 5.3; NFC | 5G (Sub-6/mmWave - Carrier Dependent), Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC |
USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 1 (up to 5 Gb/s) | USB Type-C 2.0 |
Durability | IP68 (up to 1.5 m freshwater for 30 min); Armor Aluminum frame; Gorilla Glass Victus 2 front and back | IP52 (Water-repellent coating - Splash Resistant only) |
Dimensions | 5.76" x 2.79" x 0.30" (146.3 x 70.9 x 7.6 mm) | Open: 6.73 x 2.91 x 0.29 in (170.8 x 74.0 x 7.35 mm) / Closed: 3.47 x 2.91 x 0.62 in |
Weight | 5.93 oz (168 g) | 6.65 oz (188.6 g) |
Biometrics | Ultrasonic Fingerprint (under display); Face recognition | Side-mounted fingerprint reader, Face Unlock |
Extras | Samsung DeX; Samsung Knox; Stereo speakers tuned by AKG; Dual eSIM support (varies by carrier) | Vegan Leather finish, Stereo Speakers (Dolby Atmos), Ready For (Wireless only) |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

Samsung Galaxy S23
✓ Pros:
- • Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy chip outperforms standard version
- • Compact, lightweight design is easy to use with one hand
- • Bright 1750 nits display ensures excellent outdoor visibility
- • Versatile camera system with genuine 3x optical zoom
- • Solid battery life for its size class (3900 mAh)
✗ Cons:
- • Base 128GB model uses slower UFS 3.1 storage (256GB+ uses UFS 4.0)
- • Charging speed is limited to 25W (significantly slower than competitors)
- • Lacks UWB (Ultra-Wideband) support found in Plus/Ultra models
- • Refresh rate floor is 48Hz (not 1Hz like LTPO panels on Ultra)
- • Small screen size may be limiting for heavy media consumption
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Motorola razr (2023)
✓ Pros:
- • Most accessible price point for a new foldable phone in the US
- • Battery life (4,200mAh) exceeds that of the premium Razr+ and Galaxy Z Flip5
- • Premium vegan leather design feels grippy and durable
- • Main screen is excellent: 144Hz LTPO with invisible crease mechanics
- • Includes wireless charging (albeit slow 5W)
✗ Cons:
- • External display (1.5") is tiny and only useful for basic notifications (unlike Razr+)
- • Charger is NOT included in the box (unlike previous Moto G phones)
- • Performance (Snapdragon 7 Gen 1) is mid-range, not flagship level
- • IP52 rating is weak compared to Samsung's IPX8 (submersion protection)
- • USB 2.0 port means slow data transfer and no wired video output
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The Samsung Galaxy S23 is the better buy for most people - its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chip crushes the razr's Snapdragon 7 Gen 1. That said, grab the Motorola razr (2023) if you want a foldable phone - it's the most accessible foldable on the market right now.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Samsung Galaxy S23 if: you need top-tier performance for gaming, you prioritize camera quality with a versatile setup, or you want a compact design that's easy to handle. (6.1" display, 120 Hz refresh)
Choose the Motorola razr (2023) if: you prefer a foldable phone for unique style, you want longer battery life for everyday tasks, or you're looking for a budget-friendly foldable option. (6.9" display, 144 Hz refresh)
Conclusion
There is no wrong answer here. Focus on the features you will use daily and pick the model that aligns with them.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
Samsung Galaxy S23 excels if you value powerful snapdragon 8 gen 2 for galaxy chip outperforms standard version. Motorola razr (2023) is better if you prioritize most accessible price point for a new foldable phone in the us. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
