Samsung Galaxy S23 vs Motorola razr+ (2024)
You'd expect the Samsung Galaxy S23 to dominate, but the Motorola razr+ (2024) flips the script with its impressive 6.9" display and 165Hz refresh rate. The S23 is the mid-range option, but it shines with a Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chip that delivers serious performance. If you're aiming for a flagship experience, the razr+ is the way to go, especially with its vibrant cover screen and premium design. The Galaxy S23's 3900mAh battery lasts around 22 hours on video playback, making it a solid option for streaming on the go. The main takeaway?
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Samsung Galaxy S23

Motorola razr+ (2024)
Only the specs that differ are shown here. Winners are highlighted when the data is clear.
+Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Expand
Full specs, pros, and cons
Everything side-by-side with ratings and the full spec list.
Comparison: Samsung Galaxy S23 vs Motorola razr+ (2024)

Samsung Galaxy S23

Motorola razr+ (2024)
| Criterion | Samsung Galaxy S23 | Motorola razr+ (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★4.4(101)Best Buy | ★4.3(206)Best Buy |
Operating System | Android | Android |
Software Support | 4 generations of OS upgrades (Android 14, 15, 16, 17); 5 years of security updates (guaranteed until 2028) | 3 years of OS upgrades; 4 years of security updates |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (4nm; 8-core CPU: 1x3.36GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8GHz A715, 2x2.8GHz A710, 3x2.0GHz A510) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Mobile Platform |
Graphics | Adreno 740 (719 MHz) | Qualcomm Adreno 735 |
RAM | 8 GB (LPDDR5X) | 12GB LPDDR5X |
Storage | 128GB (UFS 3.1) / 256GB (UFS 4.0) / 512GB (UFS 4.0) | 256GB (UFS 4.0) |
Display Size | 6.1" (6.1" full rectangle; 5.9" accounting for rounded corners) | Main: 6.9" Foldable + Cover: 4.0" |
Screen Type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | Main: Foldable LTPO pOLED; Cover: LTPO pOLED |
Resolution | 2340 x 1080 pixels (FHD+, 425 ppi) | Main: 2640 x 1080 pixels (FHD+), 413 ppi; Cover: 1272 x 1080 pixels, 417 ppi |
Refresh Rate | Adaptive 48–120 Hz | 165Hz (Main and Cover) |
Peak Brightness | 1200 nits (HBM); 1750 nits peak (outdoor) | 3,000 nits (Peak, Main) / 2,400 nits (Peak, Cover) |
Main Camera | 50MP Wide (24 mm, f/1.8), Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS | 50MP Wide (f/1.7, 0.8µm), OIS, Instant-all Pixel Focus |
Ultra-Wide Camera | 12MP Ultra Wide (13 mm, f/2.2, 120° FOV), Super Steady video | N/A (Replaced by Telephoto lens) |
Telephoto Camera | 10MP Telephoto (70 mm, f/2.4), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom | 50MP Telephoto (2x optical, f/2.0), 0.64µm; 2x Optical Zoom |
Optical Zoom | 3x optical zoom; 30x Space Zoom | 2x Optical Zoom |
Digital Zoom | Up to 30x | Up to 30x Digital Zoom |
Video Recording | 8K video at 24/30 fps; 4K at 30/60 fps; Slow motion 1080p at 240/960 fps | 4K@60fps, 1080p@60fps; 4K HDR10+@30fps |
Front Camera | 12MP Front (26 mm, f/2.2), Dual Pixel PDAF; 4K video at 30/60 fps | 32MP Front (f/2.4, 0.7µm), Quad Pixel technology |
Battery | 3900 mAh (Li-ion); Up to 22 hours video playback | 4,000 mAh (Non-removable) |
Wired Charging | USB-C; Up to 50% in ~30 minutes with 25W adapter (sold separately) | Up to 45W TurboPower (Charger sold separately) |
Wireless Charging | Fast Wireless Charging 2.0 (up to 15W); Wireless PowerShare (4.5W) | 15W Wireless Charging; 5W Reverse Charging |
Connectivity | 5G (sub-6 GHz and mmWave); Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax); Bluetooth 5.3; NFC | 5G (Sub6); Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be); Bluetooth 5.4; NFC; Dual SIM (Nano-SIM + eSIM) |
USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 1 (up to 5 Gb/s) | USB Type-C 2.0 |
Durability | IP68 (up to 1.5 m freshwater for 30 min); Armor Aluminum frame; Gorilla Glass Victus 2 front and back | IPX8 (Water resistant up to 1.5m for 30 min); Gorilla Glass Victus (cover); Vegan leather finish |
Dimensions | 5.76" x 2.79" x 0.30" (146.3 x 70.9 x 7.6 mm) | Unfolded: 6.75" x 2.91" x 0.28" (171.4 x 74.0 x 7.1 mm); Folded: 3.47" x 2.91" x 0.60" (88.1 x 74.0 x 15.3 mm) |
Weight | 5.93 oz (168 g) | 6.67 oz (189 g) |
Biometrics | Ultrasonic Fingerprint (under display); Face recognition | Side-mounted Fingerprint Reader; Face Unlock |
Extras | Samsung DeX; Samsung Knox; Stereo speakers tuned by AKG; Dual eSIM support (varies by carrier) | Moto AI features; Snapdragon Sound; Stereo Speakers with Dolby Atmos |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. | Check Price on Amazon→ | Check Price on Amazon→ |

Samsung Galaxy S23
✓ Pros:
- • Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy chip outperforms standard version
- • Compact, lightweight design is easy to use with one hand
- • Bright 1750 nits display ensures excellent outdoor visibility
- • Versatile camera system with genuine 3x optical zoom
- • Solid battery life for its size class (3900 mAh)
✗ Cons:
- • Base 128GB model uses slower UFS 3.1 storage (256GB+ uses UFS 4.0)
- • Charging speed is limited to 25W (significantly slower than competitors)
- • Lacks UWB (Ultra-Wideband) support found in Plus/Ultra models
- • Refresh rate floor is 48Hz (not 1Hz like LTPO panels on Ultra)
- • Small screen size may be limiting for heavy media consumption
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Motorola razr+ (2024)
✓ Pros:
- • Largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market
- • Incredibly smooth 165Hz refresh rate on both inner and outer displays
- • Dedicated 2x optical telephoto lens captures excellent portraits
- • IPX8 rating finally matches Samsung's water resistance standard
- • Premium design with Gorilla Glass Victus and high-quality vegan leather
✗ Cons:
- • Lacks an ultrawide camera (swapped for telephoto), limiting landscape shots
- • USB-C port is limited to slow USB 2.0 speeds
- • Software support (3 OS updates) lags behind Samsung and Google (7 years)
- • Battery life (4,000mAh) is decent but trails non-folding flagships
- • No dust resistance rating (IPX8 is water only)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which one is better?
The Motorola razr+ (2024) is the better buy for most people - its stunning 6.9" display and smooth 165Hz refresh rate crush the Galaxy S23's offerings. That said, grab the Galaxy S23 if you want a compact design and a powerful chip for gaming - it's lighter at 5.93 oz compared to 6.67 oz.
Who should buy each?
Choose the Samsung Galaxy S23 if: you want a powerful gaming experience with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, prefer a lightweight phone at 5.93 oz, or need a versatile camera with 3x optical zoom.
Choose the Motorola razr+ (2024) if: you love a large, vibrant display for media consumption, need a premium design with a functional cover screen, or want faster charging at 45W.
Conclusion
There is no wrong answer here. Focus on the features you will use daily and pick the model that aligns with them.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Which has better value?
Samsung Galaxy S23 excels if you value powerful snapdragon 8 gen 2 for galaxy chip outperforms standard version. Motorola razr+ (2024) is better if you prioritize largest and most functional cover screen (4.0") in the flip market. Pick based on your budget and daily use.
+Is this an independent review?
Yes. We use affiliate links for monetization, but recommendations are research-driven and unbiased.
+Do newer models exist?
Check release timelines from the manufacturers and compare pricing before you buy. We refresh this page when major updates land.
Affiliate disclosure
PageBen uses Amazon affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports independent content for US shoppers.
